| Literature DB >> 29186885 |
Yun Cheng1, Chuanxiao Peng2, Zhenting Zhang3, Pengfei Wang4, Shengzhong Yuan5, Li Wang6.
Abstract
Although pressured metallic glass (MG) has been reported in the literature; there are few studies focusing on pressure effects on the structure; dynamics and its plastic deformation. In this paper; we report on and characterize; via molecular dynamics simulation, the structure and dynamics heterogeneity of pressured MGs, and explore a causal link between local structures and plastic deformation mechanism of pressured glass. The results exhibit that the dynamical heterogeneity of metallic liquid is more pronounced at high pressure, while the MGs were less fragile after the release of external pressure, reflected by the non-Gaussian parameter (NGP). High pressure glass shows better plastic deformation; and the local strain zone distributed more uniformly than of in normal glass. Further research indicates that although the number of icosahedrons in pressured glass was much larger than that in normal glass, while the interpenetrating connections of icosahedra (ICOI) exhibited spatial correlations were rather poor; In addition, the number of 'fast' atoms indexed by the atoms' moving distance is larger than that in normal glass; leading to the sharp decreasing in number of icosahedrons during deformation. An uniform distribution of 'fast' atoms also contributed to better plastic deformation ability in the pressured glass. These findings may suggest a link between the deformation and destruction of icosahedra with short-range order.Entities:
Keywords: dynamical heterogeneity; high pressure; metallic liquid; plastic deformation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29186885 PMCID: PMC5744296 DOI: 10.3390/ma10121361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the four pathways to glass formation employed in the computer simulation studies.
Figure 2The schematic of the compression testing geometry.
Figure 3(a) Total energy of the two samples with applied pressures of P = 0 and 25 GPa at T = 100 K; (b) The pair correlation function (PCF) of the two samples with applied pressures of P = 0 and 25 GPa at T = 100 K.
Figure 4The number of full icosahedra (FI) as a function of temperature at different pressures.
Figure 5(a) Non-Gaussian parameter (NGP) curves of the samples quenched at 1200 K without pressure release; (b) NGP curves of the samples quenched at 700 K without pressure release; (c) NGP curves of the samples quenched at 700 K after pressure release with 0 GPa.
Figure 6The stress-strain curve obtained from compression testing of samples quenched under 0 GPa and 25 GPa.
Figure 7(a) The shear deformation of the samples quenched at 0 GPa at a strain of 20%; (b) The shear deformation of the samples quenched at 25 GPa at a strain of 20%.
Figure 8The distribution of mobility of atoms in different samples quenched at different pressures.
The results of Chi-square test of the uniform distribution of the ‘fast’ atoms in the three directions of the box.
| Direction of Box | Samples Quenched at 0 GPa | Samples Quenched at 25 GPa |
|---|---|---|
| x- | 0.0517 | 0.0359 |
| y- | 0.0525 | 0.0326 |
| z- | 0.032 | 0.0187 |
Figure 9Sharing frequencies for each cluster.
Figure 10Change of the fraction of icosahedra in samples quenched under (a) 0 GPa (b) 25 GPa during compression.