Literature DB >> 29186554

Preclinical validation of a targeted next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening methodology in human blastocysts.

R S Zimmerman1, X Tao1, D Marin2, M D Werner2, K H Hong2, A Lonczak1, J Landis1, D Taylor1, Y Zhan1, R T Scott2, N R Treff2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can a novel targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) platform accurately detect whole chromosome aneuploidy in a trophectoderm biopsy and provide additional information to improve testing? SUMMARY ANSWER: Karyotypes obtained by tNGS were concordant with other validated platforms and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping information obtained can be used for improved detection and quality control. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: qPCR-based whole chromosome aneuploidy screening is highly accurate in comparison to other common methods and has been shown to improve IVF success in two randomized clinical trials. With aneuploidy screening becoming standard of care in many IVF centres, there is a need to develop platforms with high throughput, low cost capabilities. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: Twelve well-characterized cell lines were obtained from a commercial cell line repository and 31 discarded human blastocysts were obtained from 17 IVF patients who underwent comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING,
METHODS: All samples were processed using a unique amplification strategy which directly incorporated sequencing library adapters and barcodes. Sequencing was performed on an Ion Torrent Proton. A custom bioinformatics pipeline was used to determine the karyotype for each sample. The consistency of tNGS diagnoses with either conventional karyotyping of cell lines or quantitative real-time PCR based CCS of blastocyst biopsies was evaluated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall consistency per sample of tNGS based CCS in 5-cell samples from a variety of cell lines was 99.2%. In the blinded analysis of rebiopsies of aneuploid blastocysts, an overall targeted tNGS CCS consistency of 98.7% was observed per sample. These data demonstrate the ability of tNGS based CCS to provide an accurate and high throughput evaluation of aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. LARGE SCALE DATA: Not applicable. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited to whole chromosome aneuploidy, as mosaicism and segmental aneuploidy have not been investigated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: These data show an accurate, high throughput method, and with the greater depth of each amplicon sequenced in comparison to commercial kits, there is greater application available for single nucleotide polymorphism based analysis for quality control. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded through intramural research funds provided by the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. There are no competing interests.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email:journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy; blastocysts; comprehensive chromosome screening; next generation sequencing; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29186554     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gax060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  7 in total

1.  The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers.

Authors:  Andres Reig; Jason Franasiak; Richard T Scott; Emre Seli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Association between morphologic grading and implantation rate of Euploid blastocyst.

Authors:  Hua Lou; Na Li; Yichun Guan; Yuchao Zhang; Dayong Hao; Shihong Cui
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Effect of Blastocyst Morphology and Developmental Rate on Euploidy and Live Birth Rates in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Cycles With Single-Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Na Li; Yichun Guan; Bingnan Ren; Yuchao Zhang; Yulin Du; Hongjiao Kong; Yongjie Zhang; Hua Lou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 4.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Developmental potential of aneuploid human embryos cultured beyond implantation.

Authors:  Marta N Shahbazi; Tianren Wang; Xin Tao; Bailey A T Weatherbee; Li Sun; Yiping Zhan; Laura Keller; Gary D Smith; Antonio Pellicer; Richard T Scott; Emre Seli; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data.

Authors:  Diego Marin; Jia Xu; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Consistency in rates of diagnosis of embryonic mosaicism, segmental abnormalities, and "no call" results among experienced embryologists performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Emily K Osman; Shelby A Neal; Ashley W Tiegs; Brent M Hanson; Julia G Kim; Jason M Franasiak; Richard T Scott
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.