Literature DB >> 29186130

Correcting CRISPR for copy number.

John Paul Shen1, Trey Ideker1.   

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system enables global screens of gene function with high sensitivity and specificity, but off-target effects have been reported for CRISPR guide RNAs targeting genes that are amplified at high copy number. A new study describes a computational approach to correct for this copy number effect, increasing the specificity of CRIPSR screens to identify essential genes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29186130     DOI: 10.1038/ng.3994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  12 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Kıvanç Birsoy; Nicholas W Hughes; Kevin M Krupczak; Yorick Post; Jenny J Wei; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Defining a Cancer Dependency Map.

Authors:  Aviad Tsherniak; Francisca Vazquez; Phil G Montgomery; Barbara A Weir; Gregory Kryukov; Glenn S Cowley; Stanley Gill; William F Harrington; Sasha Pantel; John M Krill-Burger; Robin M Meyers; Levi Ali; Amy Goodale; Yenarae Lee; Guozhi Jiang; Jessica Hsiao; William F J Gerath; Sara Howell; Erin Merkel; Mahmoud Ghandi; Levi A Garraway; David E Root; Todd R Golub; Jesse S Boehm; William C Hahn
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cornerstones of CRISPR-Cas in drug discovery and therapy.

Authors:  Christof Fellmann; Benjamin G Gowen; Pei-Chun Lin; Jennifer A Doudna; Jacob E Corn
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.

Authors:  Traver Hart; Megha Chandrashekhar; Michael Aregger; Zachary Steinhart; Kevin R Brown; Graham MacLeod; Monika Mis; Michal Zimmermann; Amelie Fradet-Turcotte; Song Sun; Patricia Mero; Peter Dirks; Sachdev Sidhu; Frederick P Roth; Olivia S Rissland; Daniel Durocher; Stephane Angers; Jason Moffat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Gene Essentiality Profiling Reveals Gene Networks and Synthetic Lethal Interactions with Oncogenic Ras.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Haiyan Yu; Nicholas W Hughes; Bingxu Liu; Arek Kendirli; Klara Klein; Walter W Chen; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  CRISPR Screens Provide a Comprehensive Assessment of Cancer Vulnerabilities but Generate False-Positive Hits for Highly Amplified Genomic Regions.

Authors:  Diana M Munoz; Pamela J Cassiani; Li Li; Eric Billy; Joshua M Korn; Michael D Jones; Javad Golji; David A Ruddy; Kristine Yu; Gregory McAllister; Antoine DeWeck; Dorothee Abramowski; Jessica Wan; Matthew D Shirley; Sarah Y Neshat; Daniel Rakiec; Rosalie de Beaumont; Odile Weber; Audrey Kauffmann; E Robert McDonald; Nicholas Keen; Francesco Hofmann; William R Sellers; Tobias Schmelzle; Frank Stegmeier; Michael R Schlabach
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting.

Authors:  Andrew J Aguirre; Robin M Meyers; Barbara A Weir; Francisca Vazquez; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Uri Ben-David; April Cook; Gavin Ha; William F Harrington; Mihir B Doshi; Maria Kost-Alimova; Stanley Gill; Han Xu; Levi D Ali; Guozhi Jiang; Sasha Pantel; Yenarae Lee; Amy Goodale; Andrew D Cherniack; Coyin Oh; Gregory Kryukov; Glenn S Cowley; Levi A Garraway; Kimberly Stegmaier; Charles W Roberts; Todd R Golub; Matthew Meyerson; David E Root; Aviad Tsherniak; William C Hahn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Discovery of cancer drug targets by CRISPR-Cas9 screening of protein domains.

Authors:  Junwei Shi; Eric Wang; Joseph P Milazzo; Zihua Wang; Justin B Kinney; Christopher R Vakoc
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions.

Authors:  John Paul Shen; Dongxin Zhao; Roman Sasik; Jens Luebeck; Amanda Birmingham; Ana Bojorquez-Gomez; Katherine Licon; Kristin Klepper; Daniel Pekin; Alex N Beckett; Kyle Salinas Sanchez; Alex Thomas; Chih-Chung Kuo; Dan Du; Assen Roguev; Nathan E Lewis; Aaron N Chang; Jason F Kreisberg; Nevan Krogan; Lei Qi; Trey Ideker; Prashant Mali
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach.

Authors:  Raj Chari; Prashant Mali; Mark Moosburner; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Common computational tools for analyzing CRISPR screens.

Authors:  Medina Colic; Traver Hart
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

3.  Programmable Single and Multiplex Base-Editing in Bombyx mori Using RNA-Guided Cytidine Deaminases.

Authors:  Yufeng Li; Sanyuan Ma; Le Sun; Tong Zhang; Jiasong Chang; Wei Lu; Xiaoxu Chen; Yue Liu; Xiaogang Wang; Run Shi; Ping Zhao; Qingyou Xia
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Efficient Generation of P53 Biallelic Mutations in Diannan Miniature Pigs Using RNA-Guided Base Editing.

Authors:  Honghui Li; Wenmin Cheng; Bowei Chen; Shaoxia Pu; Ninglin Fan; Xiaolin Zhang; Deling Jiao; Dejia Shi; Jianxiong Guo; Zhuo Li; Yubo Qing; Baoyu Jia; Hong-Ye Zhao; Hong-Jiang Wei
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.