Literature DB >> 29185831

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction.

Albine Moser1,2, Irene Korstjens3.   

Abstract

In the course of our supervisory work over the years, we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called Frequently Asked Questions. This journal series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of papers reporting on qualitative research. This first article describes the key features of qualitative research, provides publications for further learning and reading, and gives an outline of the series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Qualitative research; emerging design; natural context; phenomena; primary care; qualitative methodology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29185831      PMCID: PMC8816396          DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract        ISSN: 1381-4788            Impact factor:   1.904


Introduction

In the course of our supervisory work over the years, we have noticed that while many researchers who conducted qualitative research for the first time understood the tenets of qualitative research, knowing about qualitative methodology and carrying out qualitative research were two different things. We noticed that they somehow mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology and methods. We also observed that they experienced many uncertainties when doing qualitative research. They expressed a great need for practical guidance regarding key methodological issues. For example, questions often heard and addressed were, ‘What kind of literature would I search for when preparing a qualitative study?’ ‘Is it normal that my research question seems to change during the study?’ ‘What types of sampling can I use?’ ‘What methods of data collection are appropriate?’ ‘Can I wait with my analysis until all data have been collected?’ ‘What are the quality criteria for qualitative research?’ ‘How do I report my qualitative study?’ This induced us to write this series providing ‘practical guidance’ to qualitative research.

Qualitative research

Qualitative research has been defined as the investigation of phenomena, typically in an in-depth and holistic fashion, through the collection of rich narrative materials using a flexible research design [1]. Qualitative research aims to provide in-depth insights and understanding of real-world problems and, in contrast to quantitative research, it does not introduce treatments, manipulate or quantify predefined variables. Qualitative research encompasses many different designs, which however share several key features as presented in Box 1.
Qualitative research studies phenomena in the natural contexts of individuals or groups.
Qualitative researchers try to gain a deeper understanding of people’s experiences, perceptions, behaviour and processes and the meanings they attach to them.
During the research process, researchers use ‘emerging design’ to be flexible in adjusting to the context.
Data collection and analysis are iterative processes that happen simultaneously as the research progresses.
Key features of qualitative research. Qualitative research is associated with the constructivist or naturalistic paradigm, which began as a countermovement to the positivistic paradigm associated with quantitative research. Where positivism assumes that there is an orderly reality that can be objectively studied, constructivism holds that there are multiple interpretations of reality and that the goal of the research is to understand how individuals construct reality within their natural context [1].

High-quality qualitative research in primary care

Qualitative research is a vital aspect of research in primary care and qualitative studies with a clear and important clinical message can be highly cited [2,3]. This series intends to provide novice researchers an introduction to information about conducting high-quality qualitative research in the field of primary care. By novice researchers, we mean Master’s students and junior researchers in primary care as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. As primary care is an interprofessional field, we bear in mind that our readers have different backgrounds, e.g. general practice, nursing, maternity care, occupational therapy, physical therapy and health sciences. This series is not a straightforward ‘cookbook’ but a source to consult when engaging in qualitative research. We neither explain all the details nor deliver an emergency kit to solve the sort of problems that all qualitative researchers encounter at least once in their lifetimes, such as failing audio recorders. We do focus on topics that have evoked a lot of questions and worries among novice researchers; the so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). We aim to provide researchers with practical guidance for doing qualitative research. For the journal’s editorial policy, it will serve as a standard for qualitative research papers. For those who are not involved in qualitative research on a daily basis, this series might be used as an introduction to understanding what high-quality qualitative research entails. This way, the series will also provide readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of papers reporting on qualitative research.

Further education and reading

As in quantitative research, qualitative research requires excellent methodology. Therefore, researchers in primary care need to be sufficiently trained in this type of research [2]. We hope that this series will function as a stepping stone towards participation in relevant national and international qualitative research courses or networks and will stimulate reading books and articles on qualitative research. During our supervisory work, researchers have mentioned examples of books on qualitative research that helped them in striving to perform outstanding qualitative research in primary care. Box 2 presents a selection of these books and the BMJ 2008 series on qualitative research for further reading.
Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. Sage: London; 2014.
aBourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health Research. 1st ed. Sage: London; 2010.
Creswell JW. Qualitative research design. Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Sage: Los Angeles (CA); 2013.
aDenzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Sage: London; 2011.
Gray DE. Doing research in the real world. 3rd ed. Sage: London; 2013.
Holloway I & Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester; 2010.
aMiles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Sage: Los Angeles (CA); 2014.
Morgan DL, Krueger RA. Focus group kit. Volumes 1–6. Sage: London; 1997.
Polit DF & Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia (PA); 2017.
Pope C, Van Royen P, Baker R. Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11: 148–152.
Salmons J. Qualitative online interviews. 2nd ed. Sage: London; 2015.
Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 4th ed. Sage: London; 2013.
Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 2007;17:1372–1380.
Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010; 16(10):837–851.
BMJ series on qualitative research, published online 7 August 2008:Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a288.Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ 2008; 337:a949.Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Discourse analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a879.Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a1035.Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 2008;337:a1020.Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 2008;337:a567.

For advanced learning.

Examples of publications on qualitative research. For advanced learning.

Outline of the series

This series consists of four articles to be published consecutively in the European Journal of General Practice. The second article addresses FAQs about context, research questions, and designs. The third article deals with FAQs about sampling, data collection and analysis, and the last article focuses on trustworthiness and publishing qualitative research.
  2 in total

1.  General practitioners learning qualitative research: A case study of postgraduate education.

Authors:  Julie Hepworth; Margaret Kay
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2015-10

2.  An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Ellen Annandale; Richard Ashcroft; James Barlow; Nick Black; Alan Bleakley; Ruth Boaden; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Nicky Britten; Franco Carnevale; Kath Checkland; Julianne Cheek; Alex Clark; Simon Cohn; Jack Coulehan; Benjamin Crabtree; Steven Cummins; Frank Davidoff; Huw Davies; Robert Dingwall; Mary Dixon-Woods; Glyn Elwyn; Eivind Engebretsen; Ewan Ferlie; Naomi Fulop; John Gabbay; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Dariusz Galasinski; Ruth Garside; Lucy Gilson; Peter Griffiths; Penny Hawe; Jan-Kees Helderman; Brian Hodges; David Hunter; Margaret Kearney; Celia Kitzinger; Jenny Kitzinger; Ayelet Kuper; Saville Kushner; Andree Le May; France Legare; Lorelei Lingard; Louise Locock; Jill Maben; Mary Ellen Macdonald; Frances Mair; Russell Mannion; Martin Marshall; Carl May; Nicholas Mays; Lorna McKee; Marissa Miraldo; David Morgan; Janice Morse; Sarah Nettleton; Sandy Oliver; Warrren Pearce; Pierre Pluye; Catherine Pope; Glenn Robert; Celia Roberts; Stefania Rodella; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Margarete Sandelowski; Paul Shekelle; Fiona Stevenson; Sharon Straus; Deborah Swinglehurst; Sally Thorne; Göran Tomson; Gerd Westert; Sue Wilkinson; Brian Williams; Terry Young; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-10
  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  How qualitative studies can strengthen occupational health research.

Authors:  Cécile Rl Boot; Astrid R Bosma
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  The use of paracetamol for first-line treatment of acute sore throat. A descriptive generic qualitative study of GPs and patients.

Authors:  Kimberley De Vocht; Tycho Debie; Hilde Bastiaens; Sibyl Anthierens
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  A Qualitative Study on Continuing Medical Education Programs for Practicing Ophthalmologists in Iran: Changing Previous Norms.

Authors:  Seyed Aliakbar Faghihi; Soleiman Ahmady; Masomeh Kalantarion; Amin Habibi; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2022-01

4.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: Co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: Experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Albine Moser; Irene Korstjens
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic as lived by patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: an Italian qualitative study.

Authors:  Simone Battista; Andrea Dell'Isola; Mattia Manoni; Martin Englund; Alvisa Palese; Marco Testa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Factors influencing the prescription pattern of essential medicines from the perspectives of general practitioners and patients: a qualitative study in China.

Authors:  Shuang Shao; Juan Du; Xiaolei Chen; Tiancheng Zhang; Huanling Wang; Zhengwen Feng; Guanghui Jin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.

Authors:  Albine Moser; Irene Korstjens
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs.

Authors:  Irene Korstjens; Albine Moser
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 9.  Using immunisation caregiver journey interviews to understand and optimise vaccination uptake: lessons from Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Mohamed F Jalloh; Benjamin Hickler; Lauren E Parmley; Roberta Sutton; Shibani Kulkarni; Anthony Mansaray; Oliver Eleeza; Palak Patel; Elisabeth Wilhelm; Laura Conklin; Adewale Akinjeji; Mame Toure; Brent Wolff; Dimitri Prybylski; Aaron S Wallace; Maria Lahuerta
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

10.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.

Authors:  Irene Korstjens; Albine Moser
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.