Literature DB >> 29185102

Systematic Layout Planning of a Radiology Reporting Area to Optimize Radiologists' Performance.

Guilherme Brittes Benitez1, Flavio Sanson Fogliatto2, Ricardo Bertoglio Cardoso2, Felipe Soares Torres3, Carlo Sasso Faccin3, José Miguel Dora4.   

Abstract

Optimizing radiologists' performance is a major priority for managers of health services/systems, since the radiologists' reporting activity imposes a severe constraint on radiology productivity. Despite that, methods to optimize radiologists' reporting workplace layout are scarce in the literature. This study was performed in the Radiology Division (RD) of an 850-bed University-based general hospital. The analysis of the reporting workplace layout was carried out using the systematic layout planning (SLP) method, in association with cluster analysis as a complementary tool in early stages of SLP. Radiologists, architects, and hospital managers were the stakeholders consulted for the completion of different stages of the layout planning process. A step-by-step description of the proposed methodology to plan an RD reporting layout is presented. Clusters of radiologists were defined using types of exams reported and their frequency of occurrence as clustering variables. Sectors with high degree of interaction were placed in proximity in the new RD layout, with separation of noisy and quiet areas. Four reporting cells were positioned in the quiet area, grouping radiologists by subspecialty, as follows: cluster 1-abdomen; cluster 2-musculoskeletal; cluster 3-neurological, vascular and head & neck; cluster 4-thoracic and cardiac. The creation of reporting cells has the potential to limit unplanned interruptions and enhance the exchange of knowledge and information within cells, joining radiologists with the same expertise. That should lead to improvements in productivity, allowing managers to more easily monitor radiologists' performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facilities layout; Radiology; Radiology health operations; Systematic layout planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29185102      PMCID: PMC5873473          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarks.

Authors:  Richard Duszak; Lawrence R Muroff
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  The architecture of safety: hospital design.

Authors:  Anjali Joseph; Mahbub Rashid
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 3.  Best practices in OR suite layout and equipment choices to reduce slips, trips, and falls.

Authors:  George Brogmus; William Leone; Lorraine Butler; Edward Hernandez
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 4.  Clinical operations management in radiology.

Authors:  Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Ileana E Gill; Jui G Bhagwat; Lisa A Intrieri; Adheet Gogate; Kelly H Zou; Eric Nathanson; Steven E Seltzer; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and trends since 1991-1992.

Authors:  Mythreyi Bhargavan; Adam H Kaye; Howard P Forman; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Ergonomics in radiology.

Authors:  N Goyal; N Jain; V Rachapalli
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Effects of nursing unit spatial layout on nursing team communication patterns, quality of care, and patient safety.

Authors:  Ying Hua; Franklin Becker; Teri Wurmser; Jane Bliss-Holtz; Christine Hedges
Journal:  HERD       Date:  2012

8.  Measuring and managing radiologist workload: application of lean and constraint theories and production planning principles to planning radiology services in a major tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Sharyn L S MacDonald; Ian A Cowan; Richard Floyd; Stuart Mackintosh; Rob Graham; Emma Jenkins; Richard Hamilton
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.735

9.  Development of a local relative value unit to measure radiologists' computed tomography reporting workload.

Authors:  Jose Miguel Dora; Felipe Soares Torres; Marcos Gerchman; Flavio S Fogliatto
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Improving report turnaround time: an integrated method using data from a radiology information system.

Authors:  J P Crabbe; C L Frank; W W Nye
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.