| Literature DB >> 29184265 |
Mohammad-Ali Bahreini Pour1, Siyavash Joukar2,3,4,5, Fariborz Hovanloo6, Hamid Najafipour4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the aging process, muscle atrophy and neuromuscular junction remodeling are inevitable. The present study aimed to clarify whether low-intensity aerobic exercise along with limb blood-flow restriction (BFR) could improve aging-induced muscle atrophy and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) at the neuromuscular junction.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Blood-flow restriction; Exercise; Neuromuscular junction; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Year: 2017 PMID: 29184265 PMCID: PMC5684378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Data of the animals’ weights in the different experimental groups
| Groups/parameters | Pre weight | Post weight | P value (paired | ΔWeight% | P value (one-way ANOVA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTL | 412±11 | 433±7 | P=0.001 | 5.1±1.1 | |
| Sh | 417±14 | 438±13 | P=0.001 | 5.1±0.8 | |
| BFR | 446±9 | 442±10 | P=0.15 | −1.04±0.6 | P<0.001 |
| Ex | 410±12 | 386±10 | P<0.001 | −5.9±0.5 | P<0.001 |
| Sh+Ex | 406±11 | 390±9 | P=0.001 | −3.9±0. 5 | P<0.001 |
| BFR+Ex | 439±10 | 401±10 | P<0.001 | −8.7±1.2 | P<0.001 |
Values are means±SEMs. CTL: Control; Sh: Sham animal group, which underwent surgery without blood-flow restriction; BFR: Animal group subjected to surgery and restriction of the hind blood flow during activity; Ex: Animal group subjected to prolonged low-intensity treadmill exercise; Sh+Ex: Animal group subjected to surgery without blood-flow restriction and then prolonged low-intensity treadmill exercise; BFR+Ex: Animal group subjected to blood-flow restriction and prolonged low-intensity treadmill exercise;
P=0.001 vs. pre weight in the same group;
P<0.001 vs. pre weight in the same group;
P<0.001 vs. the CTL, Sh, and BFR groups;
P<0.001 vs. the CTL and Sh groups
Figure 1Soleus muscle hypertrophy index in the different experimental groups at the end of the study. Values are presented as means±SEMs. Numbers and abbreviations regarding the animal groups are presented in the legend to table 1. •P<0.001 in comparison with the CTL, Sh, and BFR groups
Figure 2Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle hypertrophy index in the different experimental groups at the end of the study. Values are presented as means±SEMs. Numbers and abbreviations regarding the animal groups are presented in the legend to table 1. *P=0.02 vs. the CTL and Sh groups; •P<0.001 vs. the CTL, Sh, Ex, and Sh+Ex groups; †P=0.006 vs. the BFR group
Figure 3Shows expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) in the soleus muscle using the western blot method. Values are means±SEMs. Numbers and abbreviations regarding the animal groups are presented in the legend to table 1. *P=0.02 vs. the CTL and Sh groups
Figure 4Shows expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle using the western blot method. Values are means±SEMs. Numbers and abbreviations regarding the animal groups are presented in the legend to table 1. **P=0.008 vs. the CTL and Sh groups