Literature DB >> 29183981

Robust zero resistance in a superconducting high-entropy alloy at pressures up to 190 GPa.

Jing Guo1, Honghong Wang1,2, Fabian von Rohr3, Zhe Wang1,2, Shu Cai1,2, Yazhou Zhou1,2, Ke Yang4, Aiguo Li4, Sheng Jiang4, Qi Wu1, Robert J Cava5, Liling Sun6,2,7.   

Abstract

We report the observation of extraordinarily robust zero-resistance superconductivity in the pressurized (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 high-entropy alloy--a material with a body-centered-cubic crystal structure made from five randomly distributed transition-metal elements. The transition to superconductivity (TC ) increases from an initial temperature of 7.7 K at ambient pressure to 10 K at ∼60 GPa, and then slowly decreases to 9 K by 190.6 GPa, a pressure that falls within that of the outer core of the earth. We infer that the continuous existence of the zero-resistance superconductivity from 1 atm up to such a high pressure requires a special combination of electronic and mechanical characteristics. This high-entropy alloy superconductor thus may have a bright future for applications under extreme conditions, and also poses a challenge for understanding the underlying quantum physics.
Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high pressure; high-entropy alloy; superconductivity

Year:  2017        PMID: 29183981      PMCID: PMC5740615          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716981114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are a new class of materials that are composed of multiple transition-metal elements in equimolar or near-equimolar ratios (1, 2). The diverse elements in HEAs are arranged randomly on the crystallographic positions in a simple lattice, and thus have been referred to as a metallic glass on an ordered lattice. By applying this concept, many HEAs have been found in disordered solid-solution phases with body-centered-cubic, hexagonal closest-packed, and face-centered-cubic crystal structures (3–6). In many respects, HEAs display novel properties, including ultrahigh fracture toughness at cryogenic temperatures (7, 8), excellent specific strength (9), and superior mechanical performance at high temperatures (10). In addition to their promising mechanical properties, some HEAs also exhibit interesting electronic properties: [TaNb]1−(ZrHfTi) HEAs were found to display superconductivity, for example (11, 12). The combination of the promising physical properties found in the HEAs points to great potential for application. Pressure is one of the variables that can uncover unexpected phenomena and properties (13–16). For superconductors in particular, the pressure-induced enhancement of critical transition temperatures in copper-oxide and iron-pnictide superconductors (17–20), the reemergence of superconductivity in the alkaline iron selenide (21) and heavy fermion superconductors (22), pressure-induced superconductivity in H3S (23–25) and elements (26, 27), are examples. Therefore, looking for new phenomena in the superconducting HEA under pressure is of great interest. Here we report high-pressure studies on the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33, which has a critical transition temperature to the superconducting state (T) of about 7.8 K at ambient pressure (11, 12). Our observations demonstrate that this alloy exhibits extraordinarily robust superconductivity––its zero-resistance superconducting state is still achieved even at a pressure of 190.6 GPa, or almost 2 megabars (1 Mbar = 1011 pascal), a pressure like that within the outer core of the earth. Such a superconductor with a highly robust zero-resistance state, existing continuously from 1 atm to geological pressures, is extremely unusual and is in fact unique to the best of our knowledge. We attribute this surprising behavior to the stable crystal structure of the HEA combined with the apparent robustness of its electronic structure against very large amounts of lattice compression.

Results

Superconductivity Under Pressure.

Fig. 1 shows the temperature dependence of the electrical resistance at ambient pressure for a (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 sample. A sharp drop to a zero-resistance superconducting state is observed at ∼7.7 K (we define T as the temperature where the resistance changes from a finite value to zero), consistent with the results reported in ref. 12. Applying a magnetic field on the sample shows that its superconducting transition temperature (T) systematically shifts to lower temperature (Fig. 1, Inset), as expected. Temperature-dependent constant-current magnetic susceptibility characterization was also performed for the ambient-pressure sample. As shown in Fig. 1, a strong diamagnetic response is observed starting at 7.6 K, indicative of a bulk superconducting nature.
Fig. 1.

Ambient-pressure properties of the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33. (A) Resistance measured in the temperature range from 2 to 300 K. (Inset) Magnetic field dependence of the superconducting transition in fields from 0 to 8 T. (B) Zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) magnetization of the HEA in the vicinity of superconducting transition––the difference between the FC and ZFC curves is evidence for significant flux pinning on the material.

Ambient-pressure properties of the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33. (A) Resistance measured in the temperature range from 2 to 300 K. (Inset) Magnetic field dependence of the superconducting transition in fields from 0 to 8 T. (B) Zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) magnetization of the HEA in the vicinity of superconducting transition––the difference between the FC and ZFC curves is evidence for significant flux pinning on the material. High-pressure resistance measurements were performed for four samples that were cut from the material used as the standard for the superconductivity at ambient pressure. The electrical resistance measurements for these samples were performed between 4 and 300 K. Fig. 2 shows the temperature dependence of electrical resistance measured in the pressure range of 1.02–58.2 GPa for one of the samples. It is seen that the superconducting transitions of the sample subjected to different pressures are sharp and the zero-resistance state remains present throughout the full range of pressures applied. Zooming in on the resistance in the low-temperature regime (Fig. 2), we find that the superconducting transition temperature T shifts to higher temperature upon increasing pressure. Consistent results are obtained from another sample in the pressure range of 0.3–30.1 GPa, as shown in Fig. 3. To investigate the superconducting behavior at higher pressures, we carried out resistance measurements for the third sample over the wide pressure range of 1.5–179.2 GPa (Fig. 2 ). As shown in Fig. 2, the superconducting state still survives at a pressure as high as 179.2 GPa. Surprisingly, the zero-resistance state still exists at this high pressure (Fig. 2). The magnetic field dependence of the superconducting transition measured at 103.7 and 179.2 GPa, respectively, further confirms the superconducting nature (Fig. 2 ). Furthermore, our measurements up to 190.6 GPa on the fourth sample show the reproducibility of the results (Fig. 3). This is an unusual behavior of such robust zero-resistance superconductivity in a material from 1 atm up to near 2 Mbar, a pressure found inside the outer core of the earth.
Fig. 2.

Characterization of the superconducting transition of the HEA at high pressures. (A) Resistance versus temperature obtained from the measurements in the pressure range of 1.02–58.2 GPa, over a wide temperature range. (B) Detail of the normalized resistance at low temperatures for the data in A, clearly showing the effect of pressure on the resistance through the superconducting transition and the maintenance of the zero-resistance state over a very wide pressure range. (C) Temperature dependence of resistance measured on another sample in the pressure range of 1.5–179.2 GPa over a wide pressure range. (D) Enlarged view of normalized resistance in C, illustrating the superconducting transition at different pressures and in particular the robust zero-resistance state up to the pressure of 179.2 GPa. (E and F) Magnetic field dependence of the superconducting transition in the HEA at 103.7 and 179.2 GPa, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Phase diagram of superconducting transition temperature vs. applied pressure up to 190.6 GPa for the HEA, combined with plots of the corresponding resistance vs. temperature. Blue triangles and dark-yellow balls in the diagram represent the zero-resistance superconducting transition temperature T obtained from measurements at pressure below 60 GPa, while the red and olive balls stand for zero-resistance T from the measurements at pressures up to 179.2 and 190.6 GPa, respectively.

Characterization of the superconducting transition of the HEA at high pressures. (A) Resistance versus temperature obtained from the measurements in the pressure range of 1.02–58.2 GPa, over a wide temperature range. (B) Detail of the normalized resistance at low temperatures for the data in A, clearly showing the effect of pressure on the resistance through the superconducting transition and the maintenance of the zero-resistance state over a very wide pressure range. (C) Temperature dependence of resistance measured on another sample in the pressure range of 1.5–179.2 GPa over a wide pressure range. (D) Enlarged view of normalized resistance in C, illustrating the superconducting transition at different pressures and in particular the robust zero-resistance state up to the pressure of 179.2 GPa. (E and F) Magnetic field dependence of the superconducting transition in the HEA at 103.7 and 179.2 GPa, respectively. Phase diagram of superconducting transition temperature vs. applied pressure up to 190.6 GPa for the HEA, combined with plots of the corresponding resistance vs. temperature. Blue triangles and dark-yellow balls in the diagram represent the zero-resistance superconducting transition temperature T obtained from measurements at pressure below 60 GPa, while the red and olive balls stand for zero-resistance T from the measurements at pressures up to 179.2 and 190.6 GPa, respectively.

Pressure–Temperature Phase Diagram.

We summarize our experimental results, obtained from samples measured in the four independent runs, in the pressure–temperature phase diagram shown in Fig. 3. It is seen that the 1-atm superconducting Ts of these samples are almost the same at ∼7.7 K, different from the T of any element included in the superconducting HEA investigated (28, 29) and clearly shown in previous studies to be a bulk property of the HEA (11, 12). T increases with pressure for the (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 HEA, exhibiting a slow increase from its ambient-pressure value of ∼7.7 to 10 K at ∼60 GPa. On further increasing the pressure, T remains almost unchanged until ∼100 GPa and then shows a slight decline until the pressure of 190.6 GPa, where the T is about 9 K. Attempts to apply an even higher pressure than 190.6 GPa led to breaking of the diamonds in the pressure cell, unfortunately, so we do not know whether the zero-resistance state survives to the pressure of the earth’s inner core.

Discussion

High-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements on the (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 HEA were performed at beamline 15U of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The results of two independent experiments show that the superconducting HEA does not undergo a structural phase transition up to pressures of ∼96 GPa where the volume is compressed by ∼28% (Fig. 4 and Fig. S1), but its body-centered-cubic (bcc) structure is still maintained. Further, if the change of the volume is linearly extrapolated up to 190 GPa from 60 GPa, the volume is compressed by ∼53%.
Fig. 4.

Details of the high-pressure structure and superconductivity information for the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 and comparison with the behavior of constituent elements. (A and B) Pressure dependence of the lattice parameter and unit cell volume extracted from two independent XRD experiments. The SD for the lattice parameters obtained from the diffraction data are ∼1%. (C) The pressure-dependent change in the superconducting transition temperature of the HEA compared with those of Nb and Ta, its major elemental constituents. To make a better comparison with the reported T of elemental Nb (determined by magnetic susceptibility measurements, ref. 28), we use the midpoint T of our HEA and Ta samples in C. The solid circles, blue triangles, and yellow squares are the data for the HEA obtained in this study, the purple squares and orange diamonds are the data previously reported for elemental Nb (28) and Ta (29), respectively, and the violet diamonds are the data for elemental Ta found in this study. (D) Superconducting upper critical field H as a function of temperature for the HEA at ambient pressure and pressures of 103.7 and 179.2 GPa. The dashed lines represent the slopes of the upper critical fields (dHc2/dT) = at different pressures. (Inset) Pressure dependence of the zero-temperature upper critical field H(0) for the HEA superconductor up to ∼180 GPa.

Details of the high-pressure structure and superconductivity information for the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 and comparison with the behavior of constituent elements. (A and B) Pressure dependence of the lattice parameter and unit cell volume extracted from two independent XRD experiments. The SD for the lattice parameters obtained from the diffraction data are ∼1%. (C) The pressure-dependent change in the superconducting transition temperature of the HEA compared with those of Nb and Ta, its major elemental constituents. To make a better comparison with the reported T of elemental Nb (determined by magnetic susceptibility measurements, ref. 28), we use the midpoint T of our HEA and Ta samples in C. The solid circles, blue triangles, and yellow squares are the data for the HEA obtained in this study, the purple squares and orange diamonds are the data previously reported for elemental Nb (28) and Ta (29), respectively, and the violet diamonds are the data for elemental Ta found in this study. (D) Superconducting upper critical field H as a function of temperature for the HEA at ambient pressure and pressures of 103.7 and 179.2 GPa. The dashed lines represent the slopes of the upper critical fields (dHc2/dT) = at different pressures. (Inset) Pressure dependence of the zero-temperature upper critical field H(0) for the HEA superconductor up to ∼180 GPa. An analysis of the data (Fig. 4) shows that the pressure dependence of the superconducting critical temperature T of the bcc superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 is quite distinct from those of the bcc superconductors Nb and Ta, which are the major elemental constituents of the HEA material. [The superconducting T of elemental Ta has been measured to higher pressures than are found in the literature as part of the current study (Fig. S2)]. The T of the HEA superconductor continuously increases up to 96 GPa, distinct from what is observed in both Nb and Ta in the course of their exposure to pressure (28, 29). Thus, the superconducting HEA (TaNb)0.67(HfZrTi)0.33 is clearly distinct, and not just a diluted form of Nb or Ta. To further evaluate the potential applicability of the HEA superconductor under extreme conditions, we also estimate the value of the upper critical magnetic field (Hc2, the magnetic field at which superconductivity disappears) for the pressurized material by using the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) formula (30):Fig. 4 shows a plot of H versus T obtained at different pressures. The dashed lines represent the slopes of the upper critical fields (dHc2/dT) = at different pressures. The estimated values of the upper critical fields at zero temperature are ∼8 T at ambient pressure, ∼4 T at 100 GPa, and ∼2 T at 179.2 GPa (Fig. 4, Inset). The very robust zero-resistance state and robust upper critical fields from ambient pressure to pressures as high as that of the earth’s outer core, together with the high compressibility (the volume is compressed by ∼28% at 96 GPa, and the linear extrapolated change of the volume up to 190 GPa from 60 GPa is ∼53%), make the superconducting HEA a promising candidate for new applications and also pose a challenge for verifying the known superconductivity theory and developing a new one.

Materials and Methods

The sample was prepared from pieces of the pure metals. Stoichiometric amounts of niobium (purity 99.8%), tantalum (purity 99.9%), zirconium (purity 99.6%), hafnium (purity 99.6%), and titanium (purity 99.95%) pieces were arc melted in high currents (T > 2,500 °C) in an argon atmosphere and rapidly cooled on a water-chilled copper plate. A zirconium sponge was coheated to purify the reaction atmosphere from remaining oxygen. The samples were melted five times and turned over each time to ensure optimal mixing of the constituents (12). The elemental Ta for the comparison measurements had a purity of 99.95% with an ambient pressure T of 4.48 K. High-pressure resistance and magnetoresistance measurements were carried out in a diamond-anvil cell made of Be–Cu alloy. The four-probe method was applied on the flat plane of the sample. Diamond anvils with 300-, 50-, and 40-μm flats were used for different independent measurements; smaller flats were used for the higher-pressure measurements. An appropriate amount of NaCl powder was employed as the pressure-transmitting medium for the two runs of lower-pressure experiments, while no pressure medium was employed for the two runs of higher-pressure (near 2 Mbar) experiments. Pressures below and above 60 GPa were determined by the ruby fluorescence method (31) and the pressure dependence of the diamond Raman shift method (32, 33), respectively. Two independent runs of high-pressure XRD measurements were carried out at beamline 15U at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Pressure was applied up to ∼60 GPa for the first-run measurements and ∼96 GPa for the second-run measurements. Diamonds with flats of 300 and 200 μm were used and a monochromatic X-ray beam with a wavelength of 0.6199 Å was employed for all of the measurements. The pressures were determined by the ruby fluorescence method (31) and the pressure-dependent diamond Raman shift method (32, 33).
  18 in total

1.  Re-emerging superconductivity at 48 kelvin in iron chalcogenides.

Authors:  Liling Sun; Xiao-Jia Chen; Jing Guo; Peiwen Gao; Qing-Zhen Huang; Hangdong Wang; Minghu Fang; Xiaolong Chen; Genfu Chen; Qi Wu; Chao Zhang; Dachun Gu; Xiaoli Dong; Lin Wang; Ke Yang; Aiguo Li; Xi Dai; Ho-kwang Mao; Zhongxian Zhao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Enhancement of superconductivity by pressure-driven competition in electronic order.

Authors:  Xiao-Jia Chen; Viktor V Struzhkin; Yong Yu; Alexander F Goncharov; Cheng-Tian Lin; Ho-Kwang Mao; Russell J Hemley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen.

Authors:  Ranga P Dias; Isaac F Silvera
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  High-strength and high-ductility nanostructured and amorphous metallic materials.

Authors:  Hongning Kou; Jian Lu; Ying Li
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Superconductivity at 43 K in an iron-based layered compound LaO(1-x)F(x)FeAs.

Authors:  Hiroki Takahashi; Kazumi Igawa; Kazunobu Arii; Yoichi Kamihara; Masahiro Hirano; Hideo Hosono
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Electronic and magnetic phase diagram of beta-Fe(1.01)Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure.

Authors:  S Medvedev; T M McQueen; I A Troyan; T Palasyuk; M I Eremets; R J Cava; S Naghavi; F Casper; V Ksenofontov; G Wortmann; C Felser
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Accelerated exploration of multi-principal element alloys with solid solution phases.

Authors:  O N Senkov; J D Miller; D B Miracle; C Woodward
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Pressure-induced metallization of dense (H₂S)₂H₂ with high-Tc superconductivity.

Authors:  Defang Duan; Yunxian Liu; Fubo Tian; Da Li; Xiaoli Huang; Zhonglong Zhao; Hongyu Yu; Bingbing Liu; Wenjing Tian; Tian Cui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Ultrastrong ductile and stable high-entropy alloys at small scales.

Authors:  Yu Zou; Huan Ma; Ralph Spolenak
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Exceptional damage-tolerance of a medium-entropy alloy CrCoNi at cryogenic temperatures.

Authors:  Bernd Gludovatz; Anton Hohenwarter; Keli V S Thurston; Hongbin Bei; Zhenggang Wu; Easo P George; Robert O Ritchie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  High critical current density and high-tolerance superconductivity in high-entropy alloy thin films.

Authors:  Soon-Gil Jung; Yoonseok Han; Jin Hee Kim; Rahmatul Hidayati; Jong-Soo Rhyee; Jung Min Lee; Won Nam Kang; Woo Seok Choi; Hye-Ran Jeon; Jaekwon Suk; Tuson Park
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  High-Pressure Induced Phase Transitions in High-Entropy Alloys: A Review.

Authors:  Fei Zhang; Hongbo Lou; Benyuan Cheng; Zhidan Zeng; Qiaoshi Zeng
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.524

3.  Synthesis and Characterization of High-Entropy-Alloy-Type Layered Telluride MBi2Te4 (M = Ag, In, Sn, Pb, Bi).

Authors:  Yuki Nakahira; Seiya Shimono; Yosuke Goto; Akira Miura; Chikako Moriyoshi; Yoshikazu Mizuguchi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Robustness of superconductivity to external pressure in high-entropy-alloy-type metal telluride AgInSnPbBiTe5.

Authors:  Md Riad Kasem; Yuki Nakahira; Hitoshi Yamaoka; Ryo Matsumoto; Aichi Yamashita; Hirofumi Ishii; Nozomu Hiraoka; Yoshihiko Takano; Yosuke Goto; Yoshikazu Mizuguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Bibliometric Mapping of Literature on High-Entropy/Multicomponent Alloys and Systematic Review of Emerging Applications.

Authors:  Akeem Damilola Akinwekomi; Farid Akhtar
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.