| Literature DB >> 29183295 |
Hee Jung Jeon1, Kwangsoo Kim2, Jae-Ghi Lee3, Joon Young Jang3, Seongmin Choi2, Taishi Fang3, Ji-Jing Yan3, Miyeun Han4, Jong Cheol Jeong5, Kyoung-Bun Lee6, Tae Jin Kim7, Curie Ahn3,4,8, Jaeseok Yang9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies on B-cell subtypes and V(D)J gene usage of B-cell receptors in kidney transplants are scarce. This study aimed to investigate V(D)J gene segment usage in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplant (KT) patients compared to that in ABO-compatible (ABOc) KT patients.Entities:
Keywords: ABO incompatible kidney transplantation; B cell receptor; RNA-seq; VDJ usage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29183295 PMCID: PMC5706410 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0770-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Clinical characteristics of ABO-incompatible accommodation, ABO-compatible stable, and ABO-incompatible rejection kidney transplantation groups
| Parameters | ABO-incompatible accommodation group ( | ABO-compatible stable group ( | ABO-incompatible rejection group (n = 6) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at transplantation (yr) | 40.8 ± 13.8 | 44.2 ± 11.7 | 49.2 ± 11.1 | 0.406 |
| Male sex (%) | 9 (56.2%) | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (66.7%) | 0.485 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.6 ± 2.3 | 20.5 ± 3.0 | 22.9 ± 1.9 | 0.242 |
| Diabetes (%) | 2 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0.608 |
| Hypertension (%) | 13 (81.2%) | 6 (100.0%) | 6 (100.0%) | 0.284 |
| ABO incompatibility (%) | <0.001 | |||
| - A to B | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | ||
| - A to O | 4 (25.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | ||
| - AB to A | 1 (6.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| - AB to B | 3 (18.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| - B to A | 5 (31.2%) | 1 (16.7%) | ||
| - B to O | 3 (18.8%) | 3 (50.0%) | ||
| Pre-transplant dialysis (%) | 0.122 | |||
| - Hemodialysis | 12 (75.0%) | 4 (66.7%) | 3 (50.0%) | |
| - Peritoneal dialysis | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (33.3%) | 2 (33.3%) | |
| - Preemptive | 4 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | |
| Duration of dialysis (mo) | 30.7 ± 58.1 | 24.2 ± 52.9 | 8.5 ± 12.5 | 0.667 |
| Cause of ESRD (%) | 0.590 | |||
| - Diabetes | 2 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | |
| - Glomerulonephritis | 10 (62.5%) | 4 (66.7%) | 3 (50.0%) | |
| - Hypertension | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| - Polycystic disease | 3 (18.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | |
| - Unknown | 1 (6.2%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | |
| Serum creatinine at discharge (mg/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | 0.186 |
| Estimated GFR at discharge (mL/min) | 86.8 ± 24.5 | 95.9 ± 13.9 | 74.2 ± 32.8 | 0.328 |
| Serum creatinine at 3 years after transplantation (mg/dL) | 1.7 ± 1.7 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.651 |
| Estimated GFR at 3 years after transplantation (mL/min) | 54.6 ± 19.4 | 57.0 ± 7.2 | 59.1 ± 15.7 | 0.878 |
| Calcineurin inhibitor (%) | 0.149 | |||
| - Tacrolimus | 16 (100.0%) | 5 (83.3%) | 6 (100.0%) | |
| - Cyclosporine | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Trough level of tacrolimus at discharge (ng/mL) | 9.3 ± 2.3 | 9.1 ± 1.0 | 10.8 ± 3.0 | 0.382 |
| HLA mismatch (number) | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 0.001 |
| HBsAg positivity (%) | 1 (6.2%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.522 |
| Anti-HCV positivity (%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.149 |
| Donor | ||||
| - Age at transplantation (yr) | 43.9 ± 10.9 | 43.5 ± 7.5 | 40.3 ± 14.0 | 0.795 |
| - Male sex (%) | 7 (43.8%) | 5 (83.3%) | 4 (66.7%) | 0.215 |
| - Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 2.9 | 23.3 ± 2.0 | 24.8 ± 2.2 | 0.437 |
| - Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.272 |
ESRD end-stage renal disease, GFR glomerular filtration rate, HLA human leukocyte antigen, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HCV hepatitis C virus, mo months
Numerical values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical values are expressed as frequency (percentage)
aContinuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test, as appropriate
Fig. 1Immunoglobulin heavy chain V and J gene segment family usage in renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated V (a) and J (b) gene segment families in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. IGHV, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable; IGHJ, immunoglobulin heavy chain joining. * P < 0.05
Fig. 2Immunoglobulin heavy chain V gene segment usage in renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated gene segment families in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. * P < 0.05
Fig. 3Immunoglobulin light kappa chain V and J gene family usage in renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated V (a) and J (b) gene segments in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. IGKV, immunoglobulin light kappa chain variable; IGKJ, immunoglobulin light kappa chain joining. * P < 0.05
Fig. 4Immunoglobulin light kappa chain V gene segment usage in renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated gene segments in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. * P < 0.05
Fig. 5Immunoglobulin light lambda chain V and J gene family usage renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated V (a) and J (b) gene segments in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. IGLV, immunoglobulin light lambda chain variable; IGLJ, immunoglobulin light lambda chain joining. * P < 0.05
Fig. 6Immunoglobulin light lambda chain V gene segment usage in renal allograft tissue transcripts. Percent of unique, in-frame sequences using the indicated gene segment in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) accommodation, ABO-compatible (ABOc) stable, and ABOi rejection groups after kidney transplantation. All comparisons were performed with one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analyses. * P < 0.05