| Literature DB >> 29182595 |
Wenshuai Fan1, Liang Zhu1, Jifei Chen1, Changan Guo1, Zuoqin Yan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single photon emission computerized tomography and computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for assessing blood supply within the femoral head after femoral neck fracture, but its use in all femoral neck fracture patients is not feasible. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the patients for whom SPECT/CT examination will be most beneficial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-five patients with a unilateral femoral neck fracture who underwent SPECT/CT examination of the hip and were treated via closed reduction and internal fixation with three screws were enrolled between January 2009 and March 2011. A decision tree model (C 5.0) was used to identify the factors that best reflect blood supply and to build a flowchart for identifying patients who would benefit from SPECT/CT. RESULTS Fracture type was most strongly associated with the Fracture/Normal (F/N) ratio, which reflects the blood supply to the fractured femoral head. Age and the time interval from injury to examination were also associated with the F/N ratio. SPECT/CT examination is most beneficial for patients with a displaced fracture, especially if they are over 58 years old and the time interval from injury to examination is less than 10 days. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that elderly people with a displaced fracture are most likely to benefit from SPECT/CT examination, which can show the blood supply to the femoral head within a relatively short window of time after the injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29182595 PMCID: PMC5717992 DOI: 10.12659/msm.904026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Patient characteristics.
| Without necrosis (n=52) | With necrosis (n=13) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median (range) | 61.5 (29–84) | 60 (19–79) | 0.20 |
| Gender (F/M) | 31/21 | 3/10 | 0.02 |
| Fracture type | <0.001 | ||
| Garden I | 16 | 0 | |
| Garden II | 21 | 2 | |
| Garden III | 9 | 3 | |
| Garden IV | 6 | 8 | |
| Interval to exam, days | 6.3±7.3 | 4.2±5.1 | 0.35 |
| F/N ratio | 1.5±0.8 | 0.5±0.3 | <0.001 |
Figure 1SPECT/CT images of a femoral neck fracture. (A) CT image; (B) SPECT image; (C) fused SPECT/CT image.
Importance of factors for the occurrence of ONFH based on the decision tree C5.0 model.
| Factor | Importance |
|---|---|
| F/N ratio | 0.31 |
| Fracture type | 0.31 |
| Age | 0.12 |
| Gender | 0.12 |
| Interval time | 0.12 |
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the sensitivity and specificity of the F/N ratio determined by SPECT/CT.
Validation of decision tree model for patient selection.
| F/N cut-off 0.6 | F/N cut-off 0.8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | Test set | Training set | Test set | |
| Right | 43 | 17 | 41 | 16 |
| Wrong | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| AUC | 0.928 | 0.969 | 0.881 | 0.871 |
| Gini | 0.855 | 0.938 | 0.762 | 0.743 |
Figure 3Decision tree model for determining whether SPECT/CT is indicated in a patient after femoral neck fracture.
Validation of decision tree model for predicting ONFH.
| Prediction | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| With necrosis | Without necrosis | ||
| Actuality | With necrosis | 10 | 3 |
| Without necrosis | 4 | 48 | |