Literature DB >> 19625148

To study the role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the femoral head vascularity in intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

Abhishek Kaushik1, Balu Sankaran, Mathew Varghese.   

Abstract

Intracapsular femoral neck fractures remain unsolved fractures even after improvement in techniques of diagnosis and internal fixation. Individuals who sustain displaced femoral neck fractures are at high risk of developing avascular necrosis and non-union. Although several methods for predicting the viability of femoral head have been reported, they are not effective or widely used because of unreliability, potential complications and technical difficulties. Dynamic MRI was introduced in the recent past as a simple, non-invasive technique to predict the femoral head viability after the femoral neck fractures. In this study role of dynamic MRI was studied in 30 patients with 31 intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Fractures were divided in to three types according to dynamic curve patterns on MRI evaluation and were followed up for 6 months to 2 years to observe the final outcome. Sensitivity, Specificity and the Accuracy of dynamic MRI in predicting vascularity after femoral neck fracture are 87%, 88% and 87%, respectively. Type A or Type B curve pattern is a positive factor to successful osteosynthesis with p value <0.0001 (Chi-square test). This is a statistically significant value. From this finding it can be suggested that the reliability of dynamic curves A and B in predicting maintained vascularity of femoral head is high. This investigation can be used to predict the vascularity of femoral head after intracapsular femoral neck fractures. There was a good correlation between the outcomes of fractures and dynamic MRI curves done within 48 h of injury. This signifies the role of dynamic MRI in predicting the vascularity of femoral head as early as 48 h. A treatment algorithm can be suggested on the basis of dynamic MRI curves. The fractures with Type C dynamic curve should be considered as fractures with poor vascularity of femoral head and measures to enhance the vascularity of femoral head along with rigid internal fixation should be undertaken to promote revascularization process and better healing of fractures. Patients with these fractures should be on longer non-weight bearing ambulation than other patients. To conclude, the dynamic MRI seems to be reliable, non-invasive, sensitive, specific and accurate method of assessing the femoral head vascularity after intracapsular femoral neck fractures as early as 48 h of injury and to predict the outcome of fractures and may be used as a guideline for management of intracapsular femoral neck fractures.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625148     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  Functional imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  James F Griffith
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-06

2.  Assessment of Osteonecrosis in the Presence of Instrumentation for Femoral Neck Fracture Using Contrast-Enhanced MAVRIC Sequence.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Matthew F Koff; Jonathan P Dyke; Lionel E Lazaro; Parina Shah; Dean G Lorich; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-08

3.  Severe osteoporosis: diagnosis of femoral fractures.

Authors:  Giuseppe Caracchini; Loredana Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

4.  Identifying Patients Who Will Most Benefit from Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography and Computerized Tomography After Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Wenshuai Fan; Liang Zhu; Jifei Chen; Changan Guo; Zuoqin Yan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  Prediction of femoral head avascular necrosis following femoral neck fracture: "pin-tract sign" of 99mTc-HDP pinhole bone scan after metallic fixation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Noh; Jae Young Lee; Sunwook Hwang; Kee Haeng Lee
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 2.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.