Literature DB >> 29182052

Estimating diagnostic accuracy for clustered ordinal diagnostic groups in the three-class case-Application to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.

Chengjie Xiong1,2, Jingqin Luo3,4, Ling Chen1, Feng Gao3,4, Jingxia Liu3,4, Guoqiao Wang1,2, Randall Bateman2, John C Morris2,5.   

Abstract

Many medical diagnostic studies involve three ordinal diagnostic populations in which the diagnostic accuracy can be summarized by the volume or partial volume under the receiver operating characteristic surface for a diagnostic marker. When the diagnostic populations are clustered, e.g. by families, we propose to model the diagnostic marker by a general linear mixed model that takes into account of the correlation on the diagnostic marker from members of the same clusters. This model then facilitates the maximum likelihood estimation and statistical inferences of the diagnostic accuracy for the diagnostic marker. This approach naturally allows the incorporation of covariates as well as missing data when some clusters do not have subjects on all diagnostic groups in the estimation of, and the subsequent inferences on the diagnostic accuracy. We further study the performance of the proposed methods in a large simulation study with clustered data. Finally, we apply the proposed methodology to the data of several biomarkers collected by the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, an international family-clustered registry to study autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease which is a rare form of Alzheimer disease caused by mutations in any of the three genes including the amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1 and presenilin 2. We estimate the accuracy of several cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers in differentiating three diagnostic and genetic populations: normal non-mutation carriers, asymptomatic mutation carriers, and symptomatic mutation carriers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; clustered study; general linear mixed models; maximum likelihood estimate; receiver operating characteristic surface; sensitivity; specificity; volume under ROC Surface

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29182052      PMCID: PMC5841923          DOI: 10.1177/0962280217742539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  18 in total

1.  [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Three-way ROCs.

Authors:  D Mossman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Multiple-Event Forced-Choice Tasks in the Theory of Signal Detectability

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Construction of joint confidence regions for the optimal true class fractions of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) surfaces and manifolds.

Authors:  Leonidas E Bantis; Christos T Nakas; Benjamin Reiser; Daniel Myall; John C Dalrymple-Alford
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Symptom onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davis C Ryman; Natalia Acosta-Baena; Paul S Aisen; Thomas Bird; Adrian Danek; Nick C Fox; Alison Goate; Peter Frommelt; Bernardino Ghetti; Jessica B S Langbaum; Francisco Lopera; Ralph Martins; Colin L Masters; Richard P Mayeux; Eric McDade; Sonia Moreno; Eric M Reiman; John M Ringman; Steve Salloway; Peter R Schofield; Reisa Sperling; Pierre N Tariot; Chengjie Xiong; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Bivariate correlation coefficients in family-type clustered studies.

Authors:  Jingqin Luo; Gina D'Angela; Feng Gao; Jimin Ding; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Longitudinal change in CSF biomarkers in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Anne M Fagan; Chengjie Xiong; Mateusz S Jasielec; Randall J Bateman; Alison M Goate; Tammie L S Benzinger; Bernardino Ghetti; Ralph N Martins; Colin L Masters; Richard Mayeux; John M Ringman; Martin N Rossor; Stephen Salloway; Peter R Schofield; Reisa A Sperling; Daniel Marcus; Nigel J Cairns; Virginia D Buckles; Jack H Ladenson; John C Morris; David M Holtzman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a review and proposal for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Randall J Bateman; Paul S Aisen; Bart De Strooper; Nick C Fox; Cynthia A Lemere; John M Ringman; Stephen Salloway; Reisa A Sperling; Manfred Windisch; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.982

View more
  1 in total

1.  Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Husneara Rahman; Yichuan Zhao
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.