| Literature DB >> 29182007 |
Andrew R Devendorf1, Carly T Jackson1, Madison Sunnquist1, Leonard A Jason1.
Abstract
There are unique methodological challenges to studying and assessing recovery in myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. This study explored these challenges through interviewing 13 physicians who treat myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Our deductive thematic analysis produced four themes to consider when approaching recovery: lifespan differences in the illness experience; the heterogeneity of myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome-case definitions, etiological stance, and misdiagnosis; patient follow-up and selection bias; and assessment logistics. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can use these considerations when working with patients, drafting recovery criteria, and interpreting treatment outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: assessment; chronic fatigue syndrome; illness experience; myalgic encephalomyelitis; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; physician; qualitative methods; recovery
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29182007 PMCID: PMC5930162 DOI: 10.1177/1359105317742195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Psychol ISSN: 1359-1053