Literature DB >> 29181989

Fourth update on CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 24 novel stent types.

Tilman Hickethier1, Justus Wenning1, Jonas Doerner1, David Maintz1, Guido Michels2, Alexander C Bunck1.   

Abstract

Background Non-invasive evaluation of coronary stent patency by coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) remains challenging. Multiple studies showed that CT technology but also individual stent design strongly influence the assessability of coronary stents by cCTA. Purpose To expand the available data on cCTA characteristics of coronary stents by 24 novel types to help interpreting examinations of patients after stent placement and selecting which stents are suitable for assessment by cCTA. Material and Methods Twenty-four novel coronary stents (17 cobalt-chromium, six stainless-steel, one platinum-chromium) were examined in a coronary phantom. Standard cCTA parameters with stent-specific algorithms were used. Image quality was quantified for each stent using established parameters (in-stent attenuation alteration and visible lumen diameter). Results Most stents (n = 14) showed lumen visibilities of 45-55%. No severe restriction of lumen visibility (>60%) was found. The majority of stents (n = 13) caused only small intraluminal attenuation deviations and no severe alterations (>20%) were found. When grouped by manufacturing material, no significant differences were found between cobalt-chromium and stainless-steel with identical mean visible diameters (1.52 ± 0.17 mm vs. 1.52 ± 0.13 mm) and comparable attenuation alterations (35.04 ± 16.56 HU vs. 21.25 ± 14.60 HU). The only platinum-chromium stent showed a smaller visible diameter (1.23 mm) and higher attenuation alteration (41.70 HU), but was also deemed to be assessable by cCTA. Conclusion All 24 novel evaluated stents are eligible for non-invasive evaluation by cCTA without significant differences between cobalt-chromium and stainless-steel stents. This updated catalogue of CT appearances of current coronary stents may serve as reference when taking care of patients with stents in need of coronary imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT angiography; Cardiac; computed tomography (CT); coronary artery; stent

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181989     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117744227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Personalized 3D printed coronary models in coronary stenting.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Shirley Jansen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-08

Review 2.  SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jagat Narula; Y Chandrashekhar; Amir Ahmadi; Suhny Abbara; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Jonathon Leipsic; David Newby; Edward D Nicol; Koen Nieman; Leslee Shaw; Todd C Villines; Michelle Williams; Harvey S Hecht
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Evaluation of soft-plaque stenoses in coronary artery stents using conventional and monoenergetic images: first in-vitro experience and comparison of two different dual-energy techniques.

Authors:  Tilman Hickethier; Justus Wenning; Grischa Bratke; David Maintz; Guido Michels; Alexander C Bunck
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

4.  Postinterventional Assessment after Stent and Flow-Diverter Implantation Using CT: Influence of Spectral Image Reconstructions and Different Device Types.

Authors:  C Zaeske; T Hickethier; J Borggrefe; L Goertz; R Dettmeyer; M Schlamann; N Abdullayev; C Kabbasch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  3D-Printed Coronary Plaques to Simulate High Calcification in the Coronary Arteries for Investigation of Blooming Artifacts.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Curtise Kin Cheung Ng; Yin How Wong; Chai Hong Yeong
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-09-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.