Mahsa Dadar1, Josefina Maranzano2, Simon Ducharme2, Owen T Carmichael3, Charles Decarli4, D Louis Collins1. 1. NeuroImaging and Surgical Tools Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 4. University of California, Davis, California.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) and dual T2w and proton density (PD) magnetic resonance images (MRIs) are considered to be the optimum sequences for detecting white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in aging and Alzheimer's disease populations. However, many existing large multisite studies forgo their acquisition in favor of other MRI sequences due to economic and time constraints. METHODS: In this article, we have investigated whether FLAIR and T2w/PD sequences are necessary to detect WMHs in Alzheimer's and aging studies, compared to using only T1w images. Using a previously validated automated tool based on a Random Forests classifier, WMHs were segmented for the baseline visits of subjects from ADC, ADNI1, and ADNI2/GO studies with and without T2w/PD and FLAIR information. The obtained WMH loads (WMHLs) in different lobes were then correlated with manually segmented WMHLs, each other, age, cognitive, and clinical measures to assess the strength of the correlations with and without using T2w/PD and FLAIR information. RESULTS: The WMHLs obtained from T1w-Only segmentations correlated with the manual WMHLs (ADNI1: r = .743, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .904, p < .001), segmentations obtained from T1w + T2w + PD for ADNI1 (r = .888, p < .001) and T1w + FLAIR for ADNI2/GO (r = .969, p < .001), age (ADNI1: r = .391, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .466, p < .001), and ADAS13 (ADNI1: r = .227, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .190, p < 0.001), and NPI (ADNI1: r = .290, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = 0.144, p < .001), controlling for age. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that while T2w/PD and FLAIR provide more accurate estimates of the true WMHLs, T1w-Only segmentations can still provide estimates that hold strong correlations with the actual WMHLs, age, and performance on various cognitive/clinical scales, giving added value to datasets where T2w/PD or FLAIR are not available.
INTRODUCTION: Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) and dual T2w and proton density (PD) magnetic resonance images (MRIs) are considered to be the optimum sequences for detecting white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in aging and Alzheimer's disease populations. However, many existing large multisite studies forgo their acquisition in favor of other MRI sequences due to economic and time constraints. METHODS: In this article, we have investigated whether FLAIR and T2w/PD sequences are necessary to detect WMHs in Alzheimer's and aging studies, compared to using only T1w images. Using a previously validated automated tool based on a Random Forests classifier, WMHs were segmented for the baseline visits of subjects from ADC, ADNI1, and ADNI2/GO studies with and without T2w/PD and FLAIR information. The obtained WMH loads (WMHLs) in different lobes were then correlated with manually segmented WMHLs, each other, age, cognitive, and clinical measures to assess the strength of the correlations with and without using T2w/PD and FLAIR information. RESULTS: The WMHLs obtained from T1w-Only segmentations correlated with the manual WMHLs (ADNI1: r = .743, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .904, p < .001), segmentations obtained from T1w + T2w + PD for ADNI1 (r = .888, p < .001) and T1w + FLAIR for ADNI2/GO (r = .969, p < .001), age (ADNI1: r = .391, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .466, p < .001), and ADAS13 (ADNI1: r = .227, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = .190, p < 0.001), and NPI (ADNI1: r = .290, p < .001, ADNI2/GO: r = 0.144, p < .001), controlling for age. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that while T2w/PD and FLAIR provide more accurate estimates of the true WMHLs, T1w-Only segmentations can still provide estimates that hold strong correlations with the actual WMHLs, age, and performance on various cognitive/clinical scales, giving added value to datasets where T2w/PD or FLAIR are not available.
Authors: José V Manjón; Pierrick Coupé; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; D Louis Collins; Montserrat Robles Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: W T Longstreth; T A Manolio; A Arnold; G L Burke; N Bryan; C A Jungreis; P L Enright; D O'Leary; L Fried Journal: Stroke Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Frank A Provenzano; Jordan Muraskin; Giuseppe Tosto; Atul Narkhede; Ben T Wasserman; Erica Y Griffith; Vanessa A Guzman; Irene B Meier; Molly E Zimmerman; Adam M Brickman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Frank A Provenzano; Jordan Muraskin; Jennifer J Manly; Sonja Blum; Zoltan Apa; Yaakov Stern; Truman R Brown; José A Luchsinger; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-12
Authors: Ryan Sanford; Jeremy Strain; Mahsa Dadar; Josefina Maranzano; Alexandre Bonnet; Nancy E Mayo; Susan C Scott; Lesley K Fellows; Beau M Ances; D Louis Collins Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Xi Chen; Kaitlin E Cassady; Jenna N Adams; Theresa M Harrison; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Mahsa Dadar; Josefina Maranzano; Simon Ducharme; Owen T Carmichael; Charles Decarli; D Louis Collins Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Keun-Hwa Jung; Kimberly A Stephens; Kathryn M Yochim; Joost M Riphagen; Chan Mi Kim; Randy L Buckner; David H Salat Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 10.170