Literature DB >> 29181805

Understanding Power Anomalies in Mediation Analysis.

Kai Wang1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found some puzzling power anomalies related to testing the indirect effect of a mediator. The power for the indirect effect stagnates and even declines as the size of the indirect effect increases. Furthermore, the power for the indirect effect can be much higher than the power for the total effect in a model where there is no direct effect and therefore the indirect effect is of the same magnitude as the total effect. In the presence of direct effect, the power for the indirect effect is often much higher than the power for the direct effect even when these two effects are of the same magnitude. In this study, the limiting distributions of related statistics and their non-centralities are derived. Computer simulations are conducted to demonstrate their validity. These theoretical results are used to explain the observed anomalies.

Keywords:  consistency; direct effect; indirect effect; mediation; power; total effect

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181805     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9598-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.

Authors:  David P MacKinnon; Chondra M Lockwood; Jeanne M Hoffman; Stephen G West; Virgil Sheets
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Power anomalies in testing mediation.

Authors:  David A Kenny; Charles M Judd
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-05

3.  When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect.

Authors:  Holly P O'Rourke; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-06

4.  Explanation of Two Anomalous Results in Statistical Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew S Fritz; Aaron B Taylor; David P Mackinnon
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Covariances between regression coefficient estimates in a single mediator model.

Authors:  Davood Tofighi; David P Mackinnon; Myeongsun Yoon
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Tom Loeys; Beatrijs Moerkerke; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-12
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Inferring causal direction between two traits in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.

Authors:  Haoran Xue; Wei Pan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.917

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.