| Literature DB >> 29181153 |
Danyan Chen1, Xiaolong Huang2, Hua Gan3, Xiaogang Du3, Song Lu1, Rongxi Huang1, Ke Liu1, Binghan Zhang1.
Abstract
In the present study, we evaluated the curative effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor alogliptin combined with motor imagery under hyperbaric oxygen in diabetic nephropathy (DN) with silent cerebral infarction (SCI). Two-hundred newly diagnosed DN patients with and without SCI were included. The SCI patients were divided into two treatment groups: Alogliptin (A group, n=50) and alogliptin combined with motor imagery under hyperbaric oxygen (B group, n=50). The degrees of neurocognitive dysfunction were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Thromboelastograms (TEGs) mapping were conducted. Serum glycoprotein VI (GPVI) mRNA expression and urine 11-DH-TXB2 levels were determined. Compared to group A patients, the severity of neurofunctional defects, GPVI mRNA expression and 11-DH-TXB2 levels were significantly lower in group B (P<0.05), while comprehensive, MoCA scores were higher in group B. The MoCA subscores of visuospatial/executive function, attention and concentration were significantly higher compared to group A (P<0.05). The sub-scores of computation, abstract thinking, language competence, memory and orientation were also higher in group B but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). TEG indexes were improved in both groups after treatment as manifested by increased R and K values, but there was significant improvement in group B. Intra-group comparisons revealed a time-dependent effect of treatment. In conclusion, the treatment of alogliptin combined with motor imagery under hyperbaric oxygen can better promote thrombolysis absorption, restore brain damage and improve neurocognitive function in DN with silent cerebral infarction.Entities:
Keywords: alogliptin; diabetic nephropathy; hyperbaric oxygen; motor imagery; silent cerebral infarction
Year: 2017 PMID: 29181153 PMCID: PMC5700399 DOI: 10.3892/br.2017.983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Rep ISSN: 2049-9434
Basic clinical and laboratory characteristics of diabetic nephropathy with and without SCI.
| Characteristics | NSCI group (n=100) | SCI group (n=100) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 61±5 | 62±4 | 0.793 |
| Sex (male:female) | 51:49 | 50:50 | 0.886 |
| Smoking | 14 (14%) | 15 (15%) | 0.852 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 8 (8%) | 10 (10%) | 0.847 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 5 (5%) | 7 (7%) | 0.765 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 131.66±4.52 | 133.00±5.04 | 0.694 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 79.92±4.69 | 81.20±3.88 | 0.703 |
| Duration of diabetes (year) | 3.70±0.80 | 3.50±1.10 | 0.778 |
| Duration of diabetic nephropathy (year) | 0.50±0.10 | 1.10±0.00[ | 0.049 |
| Intima-media thickness (mm) | 1.18±0.06 | 1.41±0.08[ | 0.040 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.85±0.72 | 5.86±0.51[ | 0.045 |
| HOMA-β | 36.50±2.42 | 28.60±5.36[ | 0.043 |
| Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (%) | 6.81±0.25 | 7.09±0.05 | 0.848 |
| Fibrinogen | 3.32±0.38 | 4.66±0.35[ | 0.048 |
| ABI | 0.91±0.06 | 0.55±0.07[ | 0.049 |
| Body fat mass (%) | 26.10±4.09 | 31.80±4.10[ | 0.032 |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation or number.
P<0.05, SCI vs. NSCI. HOMA-IR = fasting glucose × fasting insulin/22.5; HOMA-β = 20 × fasting insulin/(fasting glucose - 3.5); ABI = ankle vs. systolic pressure/brachial arterial systolic pressure; body fat mass (male) = 1.2 × BMI + 0.23 × age - 16.2; body fat mass (female) = 1.2 × BMI + 0.23 × age - 15.4; BMI = weight/height2. SCI, silent cerebral infarction; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment for β-cell function; ABI, ankle brachial index.
Figure 1.MRI features in diabetic nephropathy patients complicated with silent cerebral infarction. (A) Normal control, (B) multiple lacunar infarction, (C) right basal ganglia region infarction, (D) left temporal lobe and insular lobe infarction, (E) pontine infarction, and (F) left cerebellar infarction.
Clinical curative effect of SCI patients between the treatment groups.
| Groups | n | Basic cure | Significant change | Change | No change | Deterioration | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 50 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 18 | 2 | 60 |
| B | 50 | 9 | 26 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 82 |
SCI, silent cerebral infarction.
Comparison of Montreal cognitive assessment score between treatment groups of diabetic nephropathy with SCI.
| Groups | Treatment | Visuospatial/executive ability | Naming | Attention | Calculation | Language | Abstraction | Memory | Orientation | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (n=50) | Pretherapy | 3.20±0.26 | 2.21±0.19 | 3.15±0.27 | 2.12±0.23 | 1.29±0.10 | 1.11±0.06 | 3.11±0.36 | 4.26±0.17 | 21.80±0.69 |
| Post-treatment | 4.20±0.21[ | 2.31±0.15 | 4.35±0.22[ | 2.28±0.11 | 1.41±0.13 | 1.22±0.11 | 3.27±0.22 | 4.40±0.15 | 24.06±0.72[ | |
| B (n=50) | Pretherapy | 3.21±0.40 | 2.20±0.18 | 3.13±0.32 | 2.13±0.28 | 1.28±0.15 | 1.10±0.05 | 3.10±0.35 | 4.26±0.15 | 21.78±0.92 |
| Post-treatment | 4.48±0.20[ | 2.35±0.16 | 4.43±0.28[ | 2.34±0.10 | 1.46±0.16 | 1.24±0.13 | 3.38±0.18 | 4.45±0.12 | 25.02±0.66[ |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation or number.
P<0.05, group A vs. group B
P<0.05, pretherapy vs. post-treatment. SCI, silent cerebral infarction.
Figure 2.Comparison of Montreal cognitive assessment score between treatment groups of diabetic nephropathy with silent cerebral infarction.
Figure 3.Comparison of TEG parameters between treatment groups of diabetic nephropathy with silent cerebral infarction. TEG, thromboelastogram.
Comparison of TEG parameters of single lesion and multiple lesions in SCI patients.
| Parameters | R (min) | K (min) | α-angle (°) | MA (mm) | G (kDa) | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single lesion | 5.55±1.53 | 1.52±0.82 | 68.92±11.0 | 72.07±5.71 | 11.60±1.74 | 2.20±0.90 |
| Multiple lesions | 5.83±1.39 | 1.57±0.68 | 69.89±9.63 | 73.35±5.32 | 11.43±2.01 | 2.04±0.96 |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation or number. TEG, thromboelastogram; SCI, silent cerebral infarction; R, reaction time; K, clotting time; MA, maximum amplitude; G, clot strength; CI, coagulation index.
Comparison of TEG parameters between treatment groups of diabetic nephropathy with SCI.
| Groups | Treatment | R (min) | K (min) | α-angle (°) | MA (mm) | G (kDa) | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (n=50) | Pretherapy | 4.04±0.82 | 1.20±0.19 | 72.15±8.91 | 75.06±5.46 | 12.30±1.42 | 2.93±0.52 |
| Post-treatment | 6.20±0.84[ | 1.96±0.23[ | 63.22±9.04[ | 70.40±5.35[ | 10.12±1.38[ | 1.85±0.32[ | |
| B (n=50) | Pretherapy | 4.05±0.86 | 1.21±0.20 | 72.00±9.00 | 75.00±5.62 | 11.93±1.67 | 2.94±0.50 |
| Post-treatment | 6.78±0.32[ | 2.28±0.19[ | 60.38±9.21[ | 66.90±5.93[ | 8.62±1.62[ | 1.56±0.39[ |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation or number.
P<0.05, group A vs. group B
P<0.05, pretherapy vs. post-treatment. TEG, thromboelastogram; SCI, silent cerebral infarction; R, reaction time; K, clotting time; MA, maximum amplitude; G, clot strength; CI, coagulation index.
Figure 4.Comparison of GPVI mRNA expression between groups in diabetic nephropathy. GPVI, glycoprotein VI.