Literature DB >> 12633591

Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: mental rotation of a body segment.

L S Petit1, A J Pegna, E Mayer, C-A Hauert.   

Abstract

Classically, the mental rotation paradigm has shown that when subjects are asked to judge whether objects that differ in orientation are spatially congruent, reaction times increase with angular discrepancy, although some reports have shown that this is not always the case. Would similar results be obtained with realistic figures of body segments? In this work, the mental rotation of a hand attached to its forearm and arm in anatomically possible and impossible starting positions is compared with the mental rotation of a hammer. The main results show that reaction times increase monotonically with the angle of discrepancy for both stimuli and that the speed of rotation is higher for anatomically possible orientations in the case of the hand. Thus, mental rotation of body segments follows the same empirical rules as objects of another nature, and biomechanical constraints imposed to the motility of these segments can be considered as attributes of the mental representation. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science (USA)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633591     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00526-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  24 in total

1.  Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study.

Authors:  Barbara Pelgrims; Nicolas Michaux; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet.

Authors:  Silvio Ionta; Alissa D Fourkas; Mirta Fiorio; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in left and right handers.

Authors:  Silvio Ionta; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts.

Authors:  Silvio Ionta; Anna Sforza; Mariko Funato; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Motor imagery practice may compensate for the slowdown of sensorimotor processes induced by short-term upper-limb immobilization.

Authors:  Aurore Meugnot; Nounagnon Frutueux Agbangla; Yves Almecija; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-08

7.  Automatic motor cortex activation for natural as compared to awkward grips of a manipulable object.

Authors:  Leila S Petit; Alan J Pegna; Irina M Harris; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined, and experienced motor and somatosensory activity.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Jaime Pineda; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Constraining movement alters the recruitment of motor processes in mental rotation.

Authors:  David Moreau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Men perform comparably to women in a perspective taking task after administration of intranasal oxytocin but not after placebo.

Authors:  Angeliki Theodoridou; Angela C Rowe; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.