| Literature DB >> 29181118 |
Jan Podlesný1, Lenka Dokládalová2, Oldřich Pytela1, Adam Urbanec1, Milan Klikar1, Numan Almonasy1, Tomáš Mikysek3, Jaroslav Jedryka4, Iwan V Kityk4, Filip Bureš1.
Abstract
Nine new quadrupolar chromophores based on diketopyrrolopyrrole were designed and prepared by cross-coupling reactions. The property tuning has been achieved by structural variation of the peripheral substituents (donor) and enlargement of the π-system. Fundamental properties of target molecules were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, electrochemistry, and absorption and emission spectra. Nonlinear optical properties were studied by measuring the third harmonic generation. The experimental data were completed by quantum-chemical calculations and structure-property relationships were elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: calculations; diketopyrrolopyrrole; electrochemistry; electronic spectra; push–pull; third-harmonic generation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29181118 PMCID: PMC5687008 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Figure 1General structure of investigated DPP derivatives 1–5.
Scheme 1Synthesis of target DPP chromophores 1–5. (i) PdCl2(PPh3)2, Na2CO3, THF, H2O; (ii) PdCl2(PPh3)2, THF; (iii) PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, TEA, THF.
Figure 2Thermograms of representative chromophores 4a and 4b.
Thermal, electrochemical, and DFT calculated data for chromophores 1–5.
| Com. | Δ | Δ | ||||||||
| 261 | 330 | 0.62 | −1.03 | −4.97 | −3.32 | 1.65 | −4.92 | −2.93 | 1.99 | |
| 244 | 345 | 0.86 | −0.84 | −5.30 | −3.40 | 1.90 | −5.24 | −3.05 | 2.20 | |
| 206 | 329 | 0.95 | −0.95 | −5.42 | −3.50 | 1.92 | −5.30 | −3.15 | 2.15 | |
| 200 | 289 | 1.11 | −0.80 | −5.16 | −3.43 | 1.73 | −5.07 | −3.04 | 2.03 | |
| 215 | 227 | 1.07 | −0.85 | −5.21 | −3.52 | 1.70 | −5.04 | −3.15 | 1.89 | |
| 175 | 189 | 1.11 | −0.75 | −5.46 | −3.55 | 1.91 | −5.31 | −3.24 | 2.07 | |
| 158 | 173 | 0.81 | −0.92 | −5.46 | −3.60 | 1.86 | −5.27 | −3.21 | 2.06 | |
| 142 | 170 | 1.08 | −0.75 | −5.43 | −3.60 | 1.82 | −5.20 | −3.23 | 1.97 | |
| 188 | 192 | 0.69 | −0.78 | −5.04 | −3.57 | 1.47 | −5.31 | −3.21 | 2.10 | |
aDetermined by DSC in open aluminous crucibles under N2 inert atmosphere and with a scanning rate of 3 °C/min within the range of 25–450 °C. Melting point and temperature of decomposition were determined as intersection of the baseline and tangent of the peak (onset point). bE1/2(ox1) and E1/2(red1) are half-wave potentials of the first oxidation and reduction measured in DMF; all potentials are given vs SCE. cRecalculated from the E1/2(ox1/red1) according the equation –EHOMO/LUMO = E1/2(ox1/red1) + 4.35 ([36]). dCalculated at the DFT B3LYP/6-311++G(2df,p) level.
Figure 3Energy level diagram of the electrochemical (black) and DFT (red) derived energies of the EHOMO/LUMO for chromophores 1–5.
Figure 4UV–vis absorption spectra of chromophores 1a and 1b in 1,4-dioxane at a concentration of 1 × 10−5 M.
Figure 5UV–vis absorption spectra of chromophores 1b–5b in 1,4-dioxane at a concentration of 1 × 10−5 M.
Optical properties of chromophores 1–5.
| Com. | λmaxA | ε | λendA | λmaxF | Stokes shift | qFc | THGd | γe |
| 632 (1.96) | 45475 | 676 (1.83) | 672 (1.85) | 942 (0.11) | 0.20 | 102 | 1.81 | |
| 600 (2.07) | 44228 | 633 (1.96) | 623 (1.99) | 615 (0.08) | 0.35 | 115 | 1.22 | |
| 604 (2.05) | 50621 | 641 (1.93) | 633 (1.96) | 759 (0.09) | 0.17 | 67 | 11.55 | |
| 623 (1.99) | 61744 | 663 (1.87) | 655 (1.89) | 758 (0.10) | 0.21 | 67 | 5.26 | |
| 622 (1.99) | 79982 | 665 (1.86) | 657 (1.89) | 856 (0.10) | 0.19 | 130 | 3.94 | |
| 604 (2.05) | 63970 | 638 (1.94) | 627 (1.98) | 607 (0.07) | 0.28 | 113 | 2.46 | |
| 605 (2.05) | 60613 | 640 (1.94) | 629 (1.97) | 631 (0.08) | 0.24 | 45 | 36.06 | |
| 613 (2.02) | 66833 | 653 (1.90) | 643 (1.93) | 761 (0.09) | 0.18 | 108 | 13.19 | |
| 614 (2.02) | 46626 | 657 (1.89) | – | – | – | 15 | – | |
Measured in 1,4-dioxane at a concentration of 1 × 10−5 M. bIntersection of the low-energy edge of the CT-band (linear regression) with the horizontal axis. cMeasured as diluted samples in 1,4-dioxane, (4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran in n-propanol was used as a fluorescent standard for determining the fluorescence quantum yields (λmaxF = 614 nm, qF = 0.57). dMeasured with a 1064 nm source fundamental laser beam in reflected light geometry. eCalculated by PM7 semi-empirical method from the DFT-optimized geometries (except for 5b).
Figure 6Typical THG dependences vs the fundamental energy density.
Figure 7HOMO (red) and LUMO (blue) localizations in 1a (ethylhexyl chains truncated).