Literature DB >> 29180323

[Pathogen analysis in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing].

Ping Hu1, Meng-Chen Zou, Ying Cao, Yan-Ling Pan, Xiang-Rong Luo, Ya Jiang, Yao-Ming Xue, Fang Gao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of pathogenic microorganisms in the infected bone tissues in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing to facilitate rapid and accurate detection of pathogens and effective infection control.
METHODS: Between September, 2016 and April, 2017, 16 patients with DFO were admitted in our department and infected bone specimens were obtained during debridement. The pathogenic microorganisms in the specimens were identified using both 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing and automatic blood culture analyzer, and the characteristics of the microflora were analyzed based on 16S rRNA sequencing data in comparison with the results of blood culture.
RESULTS: The results of 16S rRNA sequencing showed that bone tissues of DFO contained diverse and uniformly distributed pathogenic organisms, among which 20 (87%) dominant genera were identified with Prevotella as the most abundant pathogen. Both 16S rRNA sequencing and routine culture results suggested the domination of gram-negative bacteria among the pathogens in DFO bone tissues. 16S rRNA sequencing, compared with routine culture, yielded a higher positivity rate (100% vs 88.24%) and detected a greater average number of pathogens (12.56 vs 1.50) and a higher proportion of gram-negative bacteria (67.16% vs 50.00%) in the samples. 16S rRNA sequencing detected nearly all the pathogens identified by routine culture except for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloaca, and identified 13 genera that failed to be detected by routine culture, including the obligate or strict anaerobes Anaerococcus, Veillonella, Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Finegoldia, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, Parvimonas, Peptoniphilus and Bulleidia. Routine culture did not detect any anaerobes in the samples but identified multidrug-resistant strains in as many as 58.33% of the pathogens.
CONCLUSIONS: 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing is capable of demonstrating the diversity and abundance of microflora in DFO bone tissues, where diverse and uniformly distributed pathogens can be detected with a discrete distribution of the dominant genera, most of which are gram-negative. Compared with routine culture method, 16S rRNA sequencing allows more convenient and accurate identification of the pathogens (especially gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes), and can be useful in clinical decision on appropriate treatment of DFO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29180323      PMCID: PMC6779638     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  25 in total

Review 1.  Factors associated with treatment failure in patients with diabetic foot infections: An analysis of data from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Maria Horianopoulou; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.602

2.  Conservative management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Authors:  S Acharya; M Soliman; A Egun; S M Rajbhandari
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 3.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.

Authors:  R I Amann; W Ludwig; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-03

Review 4.  Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication.

Authors:  Michael S Conte; Frank B Pomposelli; Daniel G Clair; Patrick J Geraghty; James F McKinsey; Joseph L Mills; Gregory L Moneta; M Hassan Murad; Richard J Powell; Amy B Reed; Andres Schanzer; Anton N Sidawy
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  A prospective, multi-center study: factors related to the management of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  B M Ertugrul; O Oncul; N Tulek; A Willke; S Sacar; O G Tunccan; E Yilmaz; O Kaya; B Ozturk; O Turhan; N Yapar; M Ture; F Akin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Metagenomics--the key to the uncultured microbes.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Streit; Ruth A Schmitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Antibiotics versus conservative surgery for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a randomized comparative trial.

Authors:  José Luis Lázaro-Martínez; Javier Aragón-Sánchez; Esther García-Morales
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Bad to the Bone: On In Vitro and Ex Vivo Microbial Biofilm Ability to Directly Destroy Colonized Bone Surfaces without Participation of Host Immunity or Osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Adam Junka; Patrycja Szymczyk; Grzegorz Ziółkowski; Ewa Karuga-Kuzniewska; Danuta Smutnicka; Iwona Bil-Lula; Marzenna Bartoszewicz; Susan Mahabady; Parish Paymon Sedghizadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Trevor McKeehan; Ethan Smith; Daniel Rhoads
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.