Literature DB >> 29178019

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

I Blancas1, M Fontanillas2, V Conde3, J Lao4, E Martínez5, M J Sotelo6, A Jaen7, J L Bayo8, F Carabantes9, J J Illarramendi10, M M Gordon11, J Cruz12, A García-Palomo13, C Mendiola14, E Pérez-Ruiz15, J S Bofill16, J M Baena-Cañada17, N M Jáñez18, G Esquerdo19, M Ruiz-Borrego20.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile.
RESULTS: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2- patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fulvestrant; Hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer; Metastatic breast cancer; Postmenopausal women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29178019     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1797-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Johnny Raffoul; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Stephen Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Metastatic breast cancer: sequencing hormonal therapy and positioning of fulvestrant.

Authors:  I Vergote; F Amant; K Leunen; T Van Gorp; P Berteloot; P Neven
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Invasive lobular vs. ductal breast cancer: a stage-matched comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Nabil Wasif; Melinda A Maggard; Clifford Y Ko; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment.

Authors:  A Howell; J F R Robertson; J Quaresma Albano; A Aschermannova; L Mauriac; U R Kleeberg; I Vergote; B Erikstein; A Webster; C Morris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial.

Authors:  C K Osborne; J Pippen; S E Jones; L M Parker; M Ellis; S Come; S Z Gertler; J T May; G Burton; I Dimery; A Webster; C Morris; R Elledge; A Buzdar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Activity of fulvestrant versus exemestane in advanced breast cancer patients with or without visceral metastases: data from the EFECT trial.

Authors:  Louis Mauriac; Gilles Romieu; José Bines
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Craig Allred; Jill Knox; Emma Quinn; Janine Salter; Chris Wale; Jack Cuzick; Joan Houghton; Norman Williams; Elizabeth Mallon; Hugh Bishop; Ian Ellis; Denis Larsimont; Hironobu Sasano; Pauline Carder; Antonio Llombart Cussac; Fiona Knox; Valerie Speirs; John Forbes; Aman Buzdar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between luminal invasive ductal carcinoma and luminal invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yayoi Adachi; Junko Ishiguro; Haruru Kotani; Tomoka Hisada; Mari Ichikawa; Naomi Gondo; Akiyo Yoshimura; Naoto Kondo; Masaya Hattori; Masataka Sawaki; Takashi Fujita; Toyone Kikumori; Yasushi Yatabe; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Evolving Complexity of Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Cancer: Special Considerations in Older Breast Cancer Patients-Part II: Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Addie Hill; Eutiquio Gutierrez; Jennifer Liu; Sarah Sammons; Gretchen Kimmick; Mina S Sedrak
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Patterns of treatment and outcome with 500-mg fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicenter Italian experience.

Authors:  Raffaella Palumbo; Federico Sottotetti; Erica Quaquarini; Anna Gambaro; Antonella Ferzi; Barbara Tagliaferri; Cristina Teragni; Luca Licata; Francesco Serra; Pietro Lapidari; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  Predictors of fulvestrant long-term benefit in hormone receptor-positive/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Rosalba Torrisi; Valentina Vaira; Laura Giordano; Annarita Destro; Vera Basilico; Saveria Mazzara; Piermario Salvini; Gabriella Gaudioso; Bethania Fernandes; Noemi Rudini; Giovanna Masci; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.