Literature DB >> 29175683

PET microplastics do not negatively affect the survival, development, metabolism and feeding activity of the freshwater invertebrate Gammarus pulex.

Annkatrin Weber1, Christian Scherer2, Nicole Brennholt3, Georg Reifferscheid3, Martin Wagner2.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, microscopic plastic debris, known as microplastics, emerged as a contaminant of concern in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Although regularly detected in aquatic environments, the toxicity of those synthetic particles is not well understood. To address this, we investigated whether the exposure to microplastics adversely affects the amphipod Gammarus pulex, a key freshwater invertebrate. Juvenile (6-9 mm) and adult (12-17 mm) individuals were exposed to irregular, fluorescent polyethylene terephthalate fragments (PET, 10-150 μm; 0.8-4,000 particles mL-1) for 24 h. Results show that body burden after 24 h depends on the dose and age of G. pulex with juveniles ingesting more microplastics than adults. After chronic exposure over 48 d, microplastics did not significantly affect survival, development (molting), metabolism (glycogen, lipid storage) and feeding activity of G. pulex. This demonstrates that even high concentrations of PET particles did not negatively interfere with the analyzed endpoints. These results contradict previous research on marine crustaceans. Differences may result from variations in the exposure regimes (e.g., duration, particle concentrations), plastic characteristics (e.g., type, size, shape, additives) as well as the species-specific morphological, physiological and behavioral traits. As a detritivorous shredder G. pulex is adapted to feed on non-digestible materials and might, therefore, be less sensitive towards exposure to synthetic particles. Accordingly, we argue that the autecology needs to be taken into account and that research should focus on identifying traits that render species susceptible to microplastic exposure.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphipods; Body burden; Ecotoxicology; Effects; Polymers; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29175683     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  Polystyrene microplastics did not affect body growth and swimming activity in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.

Authors:  Beatrice De Felice; Renato Bacchetta; Nadia Santo; Paolo Tremolada; Marco Parolini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A review of microplastics in the aquatic environmental: distribution, transport, ecotoxicology, and toxicological mechanisms.

Authors:  Jia Du; Shaodan Xu; Qingwei Zhou; Huanxuan Li; Li Fu; Junhong Tang; Yangyang Wang; Xu Peng; Yuting Xu; Xinpeng Du
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Toward the Development and Application of an Environmental Risk Assessment Framework for Microplastic.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; Richard A Becker; Anne-Gaelle Collot; John W Davis; Brett Howard; Kunifumi Inawaka; Mark Lampi; Blanca Serrano Ramon; Jay Shi; Philipp W Hopp
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 4.  Micro- and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Moyan Hu; Dušan Palić
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 11.799

5.  Interactions Between Plastic, Microbial Biofilms and Gammarus pulex: An Initial Investigation.

Authors:  Katey L Valentine; Alistair B A Boxall
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 6.  Microplastics in Wastewater by Washing Polyester Fabrics.

Authors:  Ana Šaravanja; Tanja Pušić; Tihana Dekanić
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods.

Authors:  James D O'Connor; Anne Marie Mahon; Anja F R M Ramsperger; Benjamin Trotter; Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Albert A Koelmans; Heather T Lally; Sinéad Murphy
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  Microplastic Effect Thresholds for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates.

Authors:  Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Dede Falahudin; Edwin T H M Peeters; Albert A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Rapid fragmentation of microplastics by the freshwater amphipod Gammarus duebeni (Lillj.).

Authors:  Alicia Mateos-Cárdenas; John O'Halloran; Frank N A M van Pelt; Marcel A K Jansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Vera N de Ruijter; Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Todd Gouin; Albert A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.