Literature DB >> 29175528

Excellent Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Following Down-Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Within Milan Criteria: A Multicenter Study.

Neil Mehta1, Jennifer Guy2, Catherine T Frenette3, Jennifer L Dodge4, Robert W Osorio2, William B Minteer3, John P Roberts4, Francis Y Yao5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Single-center studies have reported excellent outcomes of patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after successful down-staging (reduction of tumor burden with local-regional therapy), but multi-center studies are lacking. We performed a multi-center study, applying a uniform down-staging protocol, to assess outcomes of liver transplantation and performed an intention to treat analysis. We analyzed factors associated with treatment failure, defined as dropout from the liver transplant waitlist due to tumor progression, liver-related death without transplant, or recurrence of HCC after transplant.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-center study of 187 consecutive adults with HCC enrolled in the down-staging protocol at 3 liver transplant centers in California (Region 5), from 2002 through 2012. All patients underwent abdominal imaging 1 month after each local-regional treatment, and at a minimum of once every 3 months. The primary outcome was probability of treatment failure.
RESULTS: Liver transplantation was performed after successful down staging in 109 patients (58%). Tumor explant from only 1 patient had poorly differentiated grade and 7 (6.4%) had vascular invasion. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis of data collected a median 4.3 years after liver transplantation, 95% of patients would survive 1 year and 80% of patients would survive 5 years; probabilities of recurrence-free survival were 95% and 87%, respectively. There were no center-specific differences in survival in the intention to treat analysis (P = .62), in survival after liver transplantation (P = .95), or in recurrence of HCC (P = .99). Patients were removed from the liver transplantation waitlist due to tumor progression in (n = 59; 32%) or liver-related death without liver transplantation (n = 9; 5%). Factors associated with treatment failure, based on multivariable analysis, were pre-treatment levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >1000 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 3.3; P < .001) and Child Pugh class B or C (hazard ratio, 1.6; P < .001). The probability of treatment failure at 2 years from the first down-staging procedure was 100% for patients with levels of AFP >1000 and Child Pugh class B or C vs 29.4% for patients with neither risk factor (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective, multi-center study on HCC down staging under a uniform protocol, we found patients to have excellent outcomes following liver transplantation, with no center-specific effects. Our findings support application of the down-staging protocol on a broader scale. Patients with Child Pugh class B or C and AFP >1000 are unlikely to benefit from down staging.
Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver Transplantation; Local Regional Therapy; Tumor Recurrence; Waitlist Dropout

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29175528      PMCID: PMC6053266          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  24 in total

1.  Standing the test of time: outcomes of a decade of prioritizing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, results of the UNOS natural geographic experiment.

Authors:  Karim J Halazun; Rachel E Patzer; Abbas A Rana; Elizabeth C Verna; Adam D Griesemer; Ronald F Parsons; Benjamin Samstein; James V Guarrera; Tomoaki Kato; Robert S Brown; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus recommendations of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.

Authors:  Melanie B Thomas; Deborah Jaffe; Michael M Choti; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Curley; Yuman Fong; Gregory Gores; Robert Kerlan; Phillipe Merle; Bert O'Neil; Ronnie Poon; Lawrence Schwartz; Joel Tepper; Francis Yao; Daniel Haller; Margaret Mooney; Alan Venook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerd Otto; Sascha Herber; Michael Heise; Ansgar W Lohse; Christian Mönch; Fernando Bittinger; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Marcus Schuchmann; Anja Victor; Michael Pitton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival.

Authors:  F Y Yao; L Ferrell; N M Bass; J J Watson; P Bacchetti; A Venook; N L Ascher; J P Roberts
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Report of a national conference on liver allocation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kenneth Washburn; Christoph Wald; Michael A Nalesnik; David Douglas; Mark Russo; John Roberts; David J Reich; Myron E Schwartz; Luis Mieles; Fred T Lee; Sander Florman; Francis Yao; Ann Harper; Erick Edwards; Richard Freeman; John Lake
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 6.  Downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Akbar K Waljee; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria.

Authors:  Christophe Duvoux; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Thomas Decaens; Fabienne Pessione; Hanaa Badran; Tullio Piardi; Claire Francoz; Philippe Compagnon; Claire Vanlemmens; Jérome Dumortier; Sébastien Dharancy; Jean Gugenheim; Pierre-Henri Bernard; René Adam; Sylvie Radenne; Fabrice Muscari; Filomena Conti; Jean Hardwigsen; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Olivier Chazouillères; Ephrem Salame; Marie-Noelle Hilleret; Pascal Lebray; Armand Abergel; Marilyne Debette-Gratien; Michael D Kluger; Ariane Mallat; Daniel Azoulay; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Identification of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma and a very low dropout risk: implications for the current organ allocation policy.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; Aparna Goel; John Paul Roberts; Ryutaro Hirose; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Benefit of downsizing hepatocellular carcinoma in a liver transplant population.

Authors:  J W Jang; C R You; C W Kim; S H Bae; S K Yoon; Y K Yoo; D G Kim; J Y Choi
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Squaring the circle of selection and allocation in liver transplantation for HCC: An adaptive approach.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Guilherme M Cunha; Dorathy E Tamayo-Murillo; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplant: beyond the Milan criteria and the risk of "short-blanket" syndrome.

Authors:  Stefano Gitto; Stefano Di Sandro; Paolo Magistri; Pietro Andreone; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 3.  Obtaining Optimal Long-Term Outcomes from Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Cancer.

Authors:  Trevor W Reichman; Chandra S Bhati; Narendra R Battula
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Current locoregional therapies and treatment strategies in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  L Cardarelli-Leite; A Hadjivassiliou; D Klass; J Chung; S G F Ho; H J Lim; P T W Kim; A Mujoomdar; D M Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Alpha-Fetoprotein Decrease from > 1,000 to < 500 ng/mL in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Leads to Improved Posttransplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; John P Roberts; Ryutaro Hirose; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  [Clinical relevance of the new S3 guideline on hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer for practitioners].

Authors:  Sabrina Voesch; M Bitzer; N Malek
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura Kulik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  National Experience on Down-Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplant: Influence of Tumor Burden, Alpha-Fetoprotein, and Wait Time.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; Joshua D Grab; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Downstaging Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Evaluation of Reduction in Tumor Size before Liver Transplantation (MERITS-LT) Consortium.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Catherine Frenette; Parissa Tabrizian; Maarouf Hoteit; Jennifer Guy; Neehar Parikh; T Tara Ghaziani; Renu Dhanasekaran; Jennifer L Dodge; Brahma Natarajan; Matthew L Holzner; Leana Frankul; Wesley Chan; Austin Fobar; Sander Florman; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparison of Milan Criteria and AFP Model.

Authors:  Bleuenn Brusset; Jerome Dumortier; Daniel Cherqui; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Ludivine Chapron; Jean-Louis Quesada; Sylvie Radenne; Didier Samuel; Francis Navarro; Sebastien Dharancy; Thomas Decaens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.