Eben J Clattenburg1, Peter Wroe2, Stephen Brown3, Kevin Gardner2, Lia Losonczy2, Amandeep Singh2, Arun Nagdev4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, United States. Electronic address: eclattenburg@alamedahealthsystem.org. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, United States. 3. School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, United States; School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate if point-of-care ultrasound use in cardiac arrest is associated with CPR pause duration. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of patients with cardiac arrest (CA) presenting to an urban emergency department from July 2016 to January 2017. We collected video recordings of patients with CA in designated code rooms with video recording equipment. The CAs recordings were reviewed and coded by two abstractors. The primary outcome was the difference CPR pause duration when POCUS was and was not performed. RESULTS: A total of 110 CPR pauses were evaluated during this study. The median CPR pause with POCUS performed lasted 17s (IQR 13 - 22.5) versus 11s (IQR 7 - 16) without POCUS. In addition, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that POCUS was associated with longer pauses (6.4s, 95%CI 2.1- 10.8); ultrasound fellowship trained faculty trended towards shorter CPR pauses (-4.1s, 95%CI -8.8-0.6) compared to non-ultrasound fellowship trained faculty; and when the same provider led the resuscitation and performed the POCUS, pause durations were 6.1s (95%CI 0.4 -11.8) longer than when another provider performed the POCUS. CONCLUSION: In this prospective cohort trial of 24 patients with CA, POCUS during CPR pauses was associated with longer interruptions in CPR.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate if point-of-care ultrasound use in cardiac arrest is associated with CPR pause duration. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of patients with cardiac arrest (CA) presenting to an urban emergency department from July 2016 to January 2017. We collected video recordings of patients with CA in designated code rooms with video recording equipment. The CAs recordings were reviewed and coded by two abstractors. The primary outcome was the difference CPR pause duration when POCUS was and was not performed. RESULTS: A total of 110 CPR pauses were evaluated during this study. The median CPR pause with POCUS performed lasted 17s (IQR 13 - 22.5) versus 11s (IQR 7 - 16) without POCUS. In addition, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that POCUS was associated with longer pauses (6.4s, 95%CI 2.1- 10.8); ultrasound fellowship trained faculty trended towards shorter CPR pauses (-4.1s, 95%CI -8.8-0.6) compared to non-ultrasound fellowship trained faculty; and when the same provider led the resuscitation and performed the POCUS, pause durations were 6.1s (95%CI 0.4 -11.8) longer than when another provider performed the POCUS. CONCLUSION: In this prospective cohort trial of 24 patients with CA, POCUS during CPR pauses was associated with longer interruptions in CPR.
Authors: James Fair; Michael P Mallin; Aaron Adler; Patrick Ockerse; Jacob Steenblik; Joseph Tonna; Scott T Youngquist Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Ian K Maconochie; Richard Aickin; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Robert Bingham; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kee-Chong Ng; Gabrielle A Nuthall; Gene Y K Ong; Amelia G Reis; Stephen M Schexnayder; Barnaby R Scholefield; Janice A Tijssen; Jerry P Nolan; Peter T Morley; Patrick Van de Voorde; Arno L Zaritsky; Allan R de Caen Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Daniel M Rolston; Timmy Li; Casey Owens; Ghania Haddad; Timothy J Palmieri; Veronika Blinder; Jennifer L Wolff; Michael Cassara; Qiuping Zhou; Lance B Becker Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Romolo Gaspari; Justin Harvey; Christopher DiCroce; Ari Nalbandian; Michael Hill; Robert Lindsay; Alexandra Nordberg; Powell Graham; Andrew Kamilaris; Timothy Gleeson Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2021-03-06