Adam Ferro1, Hee Joon Bae1, Gayane Yenokyan2, Yi Le1, Todd McNutt1, Omar Mian3, Carol Gergis1, Chloe Haviland1, Theodore L DeWeese1, Daniel Y Song4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Oncology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: dsong2@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Interest in prostate dose reduction or focal treatment exists due to expected reductions in treatment morbidity. Prior analyses have not generally corroborated relationships between prostate or urethral dose and urinary toxicity after brachytherapy, but such analyses have been performed on cohorts all receiving the same prescribed dose. We analyzed patients treated to differing prescription doses to assess acute urinary morbidity with dose reduction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with Pd-103 to either 125 Gy or 90-100 Gy were compared using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1-month postimplant. Patients in the 90-100 Gy cohort began external beam radiation therapy after their 1-month assessment; thus, toxicities were measured before contribution from external beam radiation therapy. Patient/treatment characteristics were compared to verify subgroup homogeneity. Dose and change in IPSS 1 month after treatment were assessed using a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one and 41 patients were treated with 125 Gy versus 90-100 Gy, respectively. Preimplant and postimplant prostate volumes and initial IPSS were similar between groups. Higher prescription dose and increased pretreatment IPSS were independent predictors of increased 1-month IPSS. In addition, every 10 percentage point additional prostate volume receiving a given dose was associated with increase in IPSS after treatment for the same level of pretreatment IPSS. CONCLUSION: Lower prescription dose and decreased volume of high-dose regions to the prostate correlated with reduced acute urinary morbidity after brachytherapy. Our findings suggest that focal treatment approaches with modest dose reductions to subregions of the prostate may reduce acute morbidity and potentially expand the number of patients eligible for brachytherapy.
PURPOSE: Interest in prostate dose reduction or focal treatment exists due to expected reductions in treatment morbidity. Prior analyses have not generally corroborated relationships between prostate or urethral dose and urinary toxicity after brachytherapy, but such analyses have been performed on cohorts all receiving the same prescribed dose. We analyzed patients treated to differing prescription doses to assess acute urinary morbidity with dose reduction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with Pd-103 to either 125 Gy or 90-100 Gy were compared using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1-month postimplant. Patients in the 90-100 Gy cohort began external beam radiation therapy after their 1-month assessment; thus, toxicities were measured before contribution from external beam radiation therapy. Patient/treatment characteristics were compared to verify subgroup homogeneity. Dose and change in IPSS 1 month after treatment were assessed using a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one and 41 patients were treated with 125 Gy versus 90-100 Gy, respectively. Preimplant and postimplant prostate volumes and initial IPSS were similar between groups. Higher prescription dose and increased pretreatment IPSS were independent predictors of increased 1-month IPSS. In addition, every 10 percentage point additional prostate volume receiving a given dose was associated with increase in IPSS after treatment for the same level of pretreatment IPSS. CONCLUSION: Lower prescription dose and decreased volume of high-dose regions to the prostate correlated with reduced acute urinary morbidity after brachytherapy. Our findings suggest that focal treatment approaches with modest dose reductions to subregions of the prostate may reduce acute morbidity and potentially expand the number of patients eligible for brachytherapy.
Authors: W James Morris; Scott Tyldesley; Sree Rodda; Ross Halperin; Howard Pai; Michael McKenzie; Graeme Duncan; Gerard Morton; Jeremy Hamm; Nevin Murray Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Marion P R Van Gellekom; Marinus A Moerland; Marco Van Vulpen; Harm K Wijrdeman; Jan J Battermann Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sandeep Singhal; Muhammad F Jamaluddin; Emma Lee; Ronald S Sloboda; Matthew Parliament; Nawaid Usmani Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Andrew Herstein; Kent Wallner; Gregory Merrick; Hiroki Mitsuyama; Julius Armstrong; Lawrence True; William Cavanagh; Wayne Butler Journal: Cancer J Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Juanita Crook; Michael McLean; Charles Catton; Ivan Yeung; John Tsihlias; Melania Pintilie Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Bryan G Tollenaar; Robert W Galbreath; Jonathan H Lief Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Zachariah A Allen; Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Kent E Wallner; Brian Kurko; Richard L Anderson; Brian C Murray; Robert W Galbreath Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lara Hathout; Michael R Folkert; Marisa A Kollmeier; Yoshiya Yamada; Gil'ad N Cohen; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Josh Mason; Peter Bownes; Ann Henry; Louise Dickinson; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Stephen Langley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 7.038