Literature DB >> 11872293

The dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy-induced urethral strictures.

Gregory S Merrick1, Wayne M Butler, Bryan G Tollenaar, Robert W Galbreath, Jonathan H Lief.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of data regarding the incidence of urethral strictures after prostate brachytherapy. In this study, we evaluate multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters to identify factors associated with the development of brachytherapy-induced urethral strictures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 425 patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I for clinical T1b/T3a NxM0 (1997, American Joint Committee on Cancer) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient was lost to follow-up. 221 patients were implanted with (103)Pd and 204 patients with (125)I. The median patient age was 68 years (range 48-81 years). The median follow-up was 35.2 months (range 15-72 months). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. Thirteen patients developed brachytherapy-induced strictures, and all strictures involved the membranous urethra. A control group of 35 patients was rigorously matched to the stricture patients in terms of treatment approach; i.e., choice of isotope, plus or minus radiation therapy, and plus or minus hormonal manipulation. Nine of the 13 stricture patients had detailed Day 0 urethral dosimetry available for review. The apex of the prostate gland and the membranous urethra were defined by CT evaluation. Urethral dosimetry was reported for the prostatic urethra, the apical slice of the prostate gland, and the membranous urethra which was defined as extending 20 mm in length.
RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial risk of a urethral stricture was 5.3%, with a median time to development of 26.6 months (range 7.8-44.1 months). Of multiple clinical and treatment parameters evaluated, only the duration of hormonal manipulation (>4 months, p = 0.011) was predictive for the development of a urethral stricture. The radiation dose to the membranous urethra was significantly greater in patients with strictures than those without: 97.6% +/- 20.8% vs. 81.0% +/- 19.8% of prescribed minimum prostate dose, mPD (p = 0.031). The urethral dose 20 mm distal to the prostate apex was 57.6% +/- 23.8% vs. 31.5% +/- 13.9% of mPD for the stricture and control patients, respectively (p = 0.011). In addition, the extent of the 75% mPD and 50% mPD levels beyond the prostatic apex was also significantly greater for stricture patients, 16.6 +/- 5.3 mm vs. 11.9 +/- 4.5 mm (p = 0.010) and 19.0 +/- 3.2 mm vs. 16.0 +/- 3.4 mm (p = 0.021), respectively. Dose to the prostatic urethra was not predictive of stricture, but the magnitude and extent of high-dose regions within the prostate were predictive of stricture. Twelve of the 13 patients who developed urethral strictures were successfully managed by dilatation/transurethral incision. To date, 1 of the 12 patients has required a second dilatation. The remaining patient developed an iatrogenic induced injury and was catheter-dependent for 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: After prostate brachytherapy, the actuarial 5-year incidence of urethral strictures is 5.3% with a median time to development of 26.6 months. All strictures involved the membranous urethra and occurred within the first 44 months after brachytherapy. In most cases, membranous urethral strictures are easily managed with dilatation/incision. Factors predicting for the development of a urethral stricture included the magnitude and extent of high-dose regions within the prostate, the mean membranous urethra dose and the dose 20 mm distal to the prostatic apex, the maximum extent along the membranous urethra of certain dose levels, and the duration of hormonal manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11872293     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01811-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  Management for prostate cancer treatment related posterior urethral and bladder neck stenosis with stents.

Authors:  Bradley A Erickson; Jack W McAninch; Michael L Eisenberg; Samuel L Washington; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Management of the complications of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Comparison of urethral diameters for calculating the urethral dose after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Shinya Hayashi; Masayuki Matsuo; Masahiro Nakano; Yasuaki Kubota; Sunaho Maeda; Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Takashi Deguchi; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

5.  Observations and outcomes of urethroplasty for bulbomembranous stenosis after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Keith Rourke; Adam Kinnaird; Jeff Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Reductions in prostatic doses are associated with less acute morbidity in patients undergoing Pd-103 brachytherapy: Substantiation of the rationale for focal therapy.

Authors:  Adam Ferro; Hee Joon Bae; Gayane Yenokyan; Yi Le; Todd McNutt; Omar Mian; Carol Gergis; Chloe Haviland; Theodore L DeWeese; Daniel Y Song
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Dose to the bladder neck is the most important predictor for acute and late toxicity after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: implications for establishing new dose constraints for treatment planning.

Authors:  Lara Hathout; Michael R Folkert; Marisa A Kollmeier; Yoshiya Yamada; Gil'ad N Cohen; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  The current role of imaging for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Brendan Carey; Sarah Swift
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Blayne Welk; Ron Kodama; Greg Bailly; Tim Davies; Nancy Santesso; Philippe D Violette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.052

10.  Progressive transition from pre-planned to intraoperative optimizing seed implant: post implementation analysis.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; William Bodner; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Chandan Guha; Bhupendra M Tolia; Keyur J Mehta; Dennis Mah; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.