Literature DB >> 29174534

Subject-specific toe-in or toe-out gait modifications reduce the larger knee adduction moment peak more than a non-personalized approach.

Scott D Uhlrich1, Amy Silder2, Gary S Beaupre2, Peter B Shull3, Scott L Delp4.   

Abstract

The knee adduction moment (KAM) is a surrogate measure for medial compartment knee loading and is related to the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Toe-in and toe-out gait modifications typically reduce the first and second KAM peaks, respectively. We investigated whether assigning a subject-specific foot progression angle (FPA) modification reduces the peak KAM by more than assigning the same modification to everyone. To explore the effects of motor learning on muscle coordination and kinetics, we also evaluated the peak knee flexion moment and quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction during normal walking, when subjects first learned their subject-specific FPA, and following 20 min of training. Using vibrotactile feedback, we trained 20 healthy adults to toe-in and toe-out by 5° and 10° relative to their natural FPA, then identified the subject-specific FPA as the angle where each subject maximally reduced their larger KAM peak. When walking at their subject-specific FPA, 18 subjects significantly reduced their larger KAM peak; 8 by toeing-in and 10 by toeing-out. On average, subjects reduced their larger KAM peak by 18.6 ± 16.2% when walking at their subject-specific FPA, which was more than the reductions achieved when all subjects toed-in by 10° (10.0 ± 17.1%, p = .013) or toed-out by 10° (11.0 ± 18.3%, p = .002). Quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction and the peak knee flexion moment increased when subjects first learned their subject-specific FPA, but only co-contraction returned to baseline levels following training. These findings demonstrate that subject-specific gait modifications reduce the peak KAM more than uniformly assigned modifications and have the potential to slow the progression of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-contraction; Gait retraining; Knee adduction moment; Knee osteoarthritis; Real-time biofeedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29174534      PMCID: PMC5859947          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  41 in total

1.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; A B Ryals; J P Case; J A Block; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Training multi-parameter gaits to reduce the knee adduction moment with data-driven models and haptic feedback.

Authors:  Pete B Shull; Kristen L Lurie; Mark R Cutkosky; Thor F Besier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Muscle force modification strategies are not consistent for gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Peter B Shull; Yangjian Huang; Taylor Schlotman; Jeffrey A Reinbolt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Toe-Out Gait Decreases the Second Peak of the Medial Knee Contact Force.

Authors:  Shinya Ogaya; Hisashi Naito; Akira Iwata; Yumi Higuchi; Satoshi Fuchioka; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 6.  Gait Retraining With Real-Time Biofeedback to Reduce Knee Adduction Moment: Systematic Review of Effects and Methods Used.

Authors:  Rosie Richards; Josien C van den Noort; Joost Dekker; Jaap Harlaar
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Muscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: relationship of cocontraction.

Authors:  D L Damiano; T L Martellotta; D J Sullivan; K P Granata; M F Abel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Changes in knee adduction moment, pain, and functionality with a variable-stiffness walking shoe after 6 months.

Authors:  Jennifer C Erhart; Annegret Mündermann; Barbara Elspas; Nicholas J Giori; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Evaluation of a patient-specific cost function to predict the influence of foot path on the knee adduction torque during gait.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Jeffery A Reinbolt; Terese L Chmielewski
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 1.763

View more
  11 in total

1.  Gait mechanics and tibiofemoral loading in men of the ACL-SPORTS randomized control trial.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Amelia J H Arundale; Melissa L Ziegler; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Changes in foot progression angle during gait reduce the knee adduction moment and do not increase hip moments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kirsten Seagers; Scott D Uhlrich; Julie A Kolesar; Madeleine Berkson; Janelle M Kaneda; Gary S Beaupre; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Worse Tibiofemoral Cartilage Composition Is Associated with Insufficient Gait Kinetics After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Alyssa Evans-Pickett; Caroline Lisee; W Zachary Horton; David Lalush; Daniel Nissman; J Troy Blackburn; Jeffrey T Spang; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  Predicting knee adduction moment response to gait retraining with minimal clinical data.

Authors:  Nataliya Rokhmanova; Katherine J Kuchenbecker; Peter B Shull; Reed Ferber; Eni Halilaj
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  A neural network to predict the knee adduction moment in patients with osteoarthritis using anatomical landmarks obtainable from 2D video analysis.

Authors:  M A Boswell; S D Uhlrich; Ł Kidziński; K Thomas; J A Kolesar; G E Gold; G S Beaupre; S L Delp
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  A novel walking cane with haptic biofeedback reduces knee adduction moment in the osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  Evan Schuster; Rebecca L Routson; Mason Hinchcliff; Karley Benoff; Pradeep Suri; Chris Richburg; Brittney C Muir; Joseph M Czerniecki; Patrick M Aubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Validation of wearable visual feedback for retraining foot progression angle using inertial sensors and an augmented reality headset.

Authors:  Angelos Karatsidis; Rosie E Richards; Jason M Konrath; Josien C van den Noort; H Martin Schepers; Giovanni Bellusci; Jaap Harlaar; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  The effect of changing foot progression angle using real-time visual feedback on rearfoot eversion during running.

Authors:  Seyed Hamed Mousavi; Laurens van Kouwenhove; Reza Rajabi; Johannes Zwerver; Juha M Hijmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Reed D Gurchiek; Nicole Donahue; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Reverse-Shoe Wearing Method for Treating Toe-In Gait in Children Can Lead to Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  Yong Li; Jun Bian; Dan Chen; Bo Jiang; Pengfei Zheng; Yue Lou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.