M A Boswell1, S D Uhlrich2, Ł Kidziński3, K Thomas4, J A Kolesar5, G E Gold6, G S Beaupre7, S L Delp8. 1. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: boswellm@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Musculoskeletal Research Lab, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: suhlrich@stanford.edu. 3. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: lukasz.kidzinski@stanford.edu. 4. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: kathoma@stanford.edu. 5. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Musculoskeletal Research Lab, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: julie14@stanford.edu. 6. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: gold@stanford.edu. 7. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Musculoskeletal Research Lab, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: garybeaupre@gmail.com. 8. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: delp@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The knee adduction moment (KAM) can inform treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis; however, measuring the KAM requires an expensive gait analysis laboratory. We evaluated the feasibility of predicting the peak KAM during natural and modified walking patterns using the positions of anatomical landmarks that could be identified from video analysis. METHOD: Using inverse dynamics, we calculated the KAM for 86 individuals (64 with knee osteoarthritis, 22 without) walking naturally and with foot progression angle modifications. We trained a neural network to predict the peak KAM using the 3-dimensional positions of 13 anatomical landmarks measured with motion capture (3D neural network). We also trained models to predict the peak KAM using 2-dimensional subsets of the dataset to simulate 2-dimensional video analysis (frontal and sagittal plane neural networks). Model performance was evaluated on a held-out, 8-person test set that included steps from all trials. RESULTS: The 3D neural network predicted the peak KAM for all test steps with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.78. This model predicted individuals' average peak KAM during natural walking with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.86 and classified which 15° foot progression angle modifications reduced the peak KAM with accuracy = 0.85. The frontal plane neural network predicted peak KAM with similar accuracy (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.85) to the 3D neural network, but the sagittal plane neural network did not (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Using the positions of anatomical landmarks from motion capture, a neural network accurately predicted the peak KAM during natural and modified walking. This study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring the peak KAM using positions obtainable from 2D video analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The knee adduction moment (KAM) can inform treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis; however, measuring the KAM requires an expensive gait analysis laboratory. We evaluated the feasibility of predicting the peak KAM during natural and modified walking patterns using the positions of anatomical landmarks that could be identified from video analysis. METHOD: Using inverse dynamics, we calculated the KAM for 86 individuals (64 with knee osteoarthritis, 22 without) walking naturally and with foot progression angle modifications. We trained a neural network to predict the peak KAM using the 3-dimensional positions of 13 anatomical landmarks measured with motion capture (3D neural network). We also trained models to predict the peak KAM using 2-dimensional subsets of the dataset to simulate 2-dimensional video analysis (frontal and sagittal plane neural networks). Model performance was evaluated on a held-out, 8-person test set that included steps from all trials. RESULTS: The 3D neural network predicted the peak KAM for all test steps with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.78. This model predicted individuals' average peak KAM during natural walking with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.86 and classified which 15° foot progression angle modifications reduced the peak KAM with accuracy = 0.85. The frontal plane neural network predicted peak KAM with similar accuracy (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.85) to the 3D neural network, but the sagittal plane neural network did not (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Using the positions of anatomical landmarks from motion capture, a neural network accurately predicted the peak KAM during natural and modified walking. This study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring the peak KAM using positions obtainable from 2D video analysis.
Authors: Pete B Shull; Rebecca Shultz; Amy Silder; Jason L Dragoo; Thor F Besier; Mark R Cutkosky; Scott L Delp Journal: J Biomech Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Josien J C van den Noort; Martin van der Esch; Martijn P M Steultjens; Joost Dekker; Martin H M Schepers; Peter H Veltink; Jaap Harlaar Journal: J Biomech Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Chao Wang; Peter P K Chan; Ben M F Lam; Sizhong Wang; Janet H Zhang; Zoe Y S Chan; Rosa H M Chan; Kevin K W Ho; Roy T H Cheung Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Bhushan R Deshpande; Jeffrey N Katz; Daniel H Solomon; Edward H Yelin; David J Hunter; Stephen P Messier; Lisa G Suter; Elena Losina Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Pete B Shull; Amy Silder; Rebecca Shultz; Jason L Dragoo; Thor F Besier; Scott L Delp; Mark R Cutkosky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Issam Boukhennoufa; Zainab Altai; Xiaojun Zhai; Victor Utti; Klaus D McDonald-Maier; Bernard X W Liew Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-05-12
Authors: Jan Stenum; Kendra M Cherry-Allen; Connor O Pyles; Rachel D Reetzke; Michael F Vignos; Ryan T Roemmich Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 3.576