Literature DB >> 29174405

Mixing of Head-Stem Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Ulrike Mueller1, Benjamin Panzram1, Steffen Braun1, Robert Sonntag1, J Philippe Kretzer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant manufacturers proclaim that the tapers of modular total hip arthroplasty are not standardized and can vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. That is why the combination of various components from different manufacturers ("Mix and Match") is not permitted. In this study, different taper combinations were investigated experimentally to assess the effect of "Mix and Match" regarding the taper connection strength.
METHODS: Torque-off tests using hip stems and metal femoral heads from 6 different implant manufacturers were performed. First the components were tested as intended and afterwards the stems were combined with metal heads from other manufacturers.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in taper connection strength when stems from the manufacturers Link, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer were combined with heads from other manufacturers. The Biomet stems showed a significantly reduced taper connection strength if femoral heads of Aesculap, DePuy, or Smith & Nephew were used. On the contrary, the DePuy stems in combination with the originally intended femoral heads showed a significantly lower taper connection strength compared to the use of heads from Link, Biomet, and Zimmer. The same was observed for the Aesculap stems in combination with Zimmer heads.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that mixing components from different manufacturers may affect the taper connection strength and could reduce the stability. As safety should be a high priority in patient treatment, any potential risks should be avoided. Therefore, mixing and matching of heads and femoral stems from different manufacturers cannot be recommended.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morse taper; head-stem connection; mix and match; modularity; torque-off moments; total hip replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29174405     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

Review 1.  What the Surgeon Can Do to Reduce the Risk of Trunnionosis in Hip Arthroplasty: Recommendations from the Literature.

Authors:  Claude B Rieker; Peter Wahl
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 3.  Femoral prosthesis neck fracture following total hip arthroplasty - a systematic review.

Authors:  P G van Doesburg; E J van Langelaan; I Apachitei; M R Bénard; S H M Verdegaal
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-10-16

4.  To mix or not to mix? Medicolegal implications of mixed components in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rinne M Peters; Jantina T Hiemstra; Wierd P Zijlstra; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.