Literature DB >> 29172271

Association between ERCC1 Polymorphism and the Risk and Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer in Thai Women in the Lower Northeastern Region

Malinee Pongsavee1, Kamol Wisuwan, Danai Tiwawech.   

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a major public health problem around the world, including Thailand and it has the highest ranking among female cancer. Currently, the diversity or polymorphism of ERCC1 gene (excision repair cross-complementary group 1 gene or ERCC1) was reported to associate with an increased risk of breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ERCC1 polymorphism and the breast cancer risk in the lower northeastern region women of Thailand. Materials and
Methods: One hundred fifty one samples from breast cancer patients and 120 samples from healthy control group were analysed. Genomic DNA was extracted from white blood cell of all samples. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to demonstrate genetic polymorphism of ERCC1.
Results: The results showed that the ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism variant AG was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. This study demonstrated that the frequency of ERCC1 rs11615 in patients with breast cancer was higher than healthy control group. The ERCC1 polymorphism variant AG carrier presented 3.53-folds high risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.61-7.74, P = 0.001]. In addition, when age, menopause period, number of child, smoking and alcohol drinking were adjusted, the ERCC1 rs11615 variant AG carrier was associated with increased breast cancer risk to 3.97 folds, with OR = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.62-8.84, P = 0.002. Conclusions: This study showed that ERCC1 rs11615 genotype AG was associated with breast cancer risk in the lower northeastern region women of Thailand. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/management

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; ERCC1 rs11615; polymorphism; Thailand

Year:  2017        PMID: 29172271      PMCID: PMC5773783          DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.2999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancy diseases among women worldwide. It is an important problem in many countries including Thailand. About 1.38 million new breast cancer cases were diagnosed in 2008 which was accounted for 25% of all cancers (Ferley et al., 2010). In Thailand, the highest incidence of breast cancer in Thai women was 28.6 per 100,000 populations (Imsamran et al., 2015). The etiological data of breast cancer shows that alcohol drinking, having a family history of breast cancer, complex interplay of genetics, environmental exposures, hormones and behaviors may contribute to breast carcinogenesis (Benz, 2008). The DNA repair systems play an important role in maintaining the stability and integrity of human genome. High levels of DNA damage caused by excessive exposure to carcinogens might be responsible for increasing an incidence of breast cancer. Unrepaired DNA damage can result in apoptosis and may lead to unregulated cell growth and even cancer (Vispe et al., 2000). The excision repair cross-complementary group 1 gene (ERCC1) is part of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, which is usually indicated to be involved with repaired DNA. In recent years, several ERCC1 variants such as rs11615, rs321986 and rs321961 have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, colorectal cancer and head and neck cancer (Zhang et al., 2012). ERCC1 rs11615 AA genotype was associated with increased breast cancer risk at 1.62 fold in China (Zecheng et al., 2013). However, there is no report about ERCC1 polymorphism associated with breast cancer risk in Thailand and Southeast Asia. Therefore, study on ERCC1 polymorphism and clinical pathology associated with breast cancer risk in the lower northeastern region women of Thailand is the main purpose of this research.

Materials and Methods

The study included 151 patients with diagnosed and histopathology confirmed with breast cancer and 120 healthy controls who visited in Ubonratchathani Cancer Hospital during the year 2015 to 2016. All patients and healthy controls were asked to provide 5-10 ml of whole blood (1.5-2.2 mg/ml EDTA was used as anticoagulant) for genotyping and signed for a written informed consent. The EDTA blood was kept at -20°C. The DNA was extracted using QuickGene DNA whole blood kit S (DB-S) (Wako Chemicals GmbH, Germany) and QuickGene-810 FUJIFILM® equipment. DNA concentrations were conducted by spectrophotometer measurement of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. by Nano Drop Technology. ERCC1 polymorphism was detected using qPCR method. Two PCR primers of ERCC1 rs11615 consisted of a forward primer, 5’-TAGTCGGGAATTACRTCGCCA-3’ and a reverse primer, 5’-CAATCCCGTACTGAAGTTCGTG-3’ (Xiaobo et al., 2013). The thermos cycling conditions were 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds in a total of 40 cycles followed by 60°C for 30 seconds. This method was able to detect all three possible genotypes of ERCC1 rs11615: homozygous wild type (GG), heterozygous variant type (AG) and homozygous variant type (AA). The histopathological and immunohistochemical data were reported by the pathologists from Ubonrachathani Cancer Hospital. Demographic and clinicopathological data were collected from the medical records. This study was ethically approved by the local Ethical Committee of Thammasat University, Thailand (EC 072/2015) and Ubonratchathani Cancer Hospital, Thailand (EC 008/2015).

Statistical analysis

The genotype and allelic frequencies of ERCC1 polymorphism in breast cancer cases and healthy controls were analyzed by STATA software (Version 11.0). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to assess the effect of each SNPs on breast cancer risk and P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological and demographic characteristics

This study included 271 subjects with 151 patients of breast cancer (mean age 52.8 ± 9.4 years) and 120 healthy controls (mean age 48.8±10.6 years). Baseline demographic characteristics of study subjects were showed in Table 1. Decreased breast cancer risk was found in those who had post menopause (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29-0.79, P = 0.003) as compared with pre menopause. In contrast, an increased breast cancer risk was observed in those who had number of child ≥3 (OR = 4.13, 95% CI = 1.51-11.26, P = 0.003) as compared with those without child. In addition, such increased breast cancer risk was observed in those who had drinking alcohol in breast cancer group (OR = 6.17, 95% CI = 2.51-15.8, P = 0.001) as compared with those without drinking alcohol. However, there was no significant different for breast cancer risk between smoker and non-smoker.
Table 1

Clinical and Demographic Characteristic of Study Subjects

VariablesNo.of cancer cases (%)No.of control cases (%)OR (95%) CIP value
(Total =151)(Total =120)
Age, years52.8 ±9.448.8±10.60.001
(Mean ± SD)
Menopausal status
 Pre-102 (67.5)59 (49.2)1
 Post-49 (32.5)61 (50.8)0.48 (0.29-0.79)0.003
Number of child
 07 (4.6)15 (12.5)1
 1-280 (53.0)74 (61.7)2.13 (0.82-5.56)0.115
 ≥364 (42.4)31 (25.8)4.13 (1.51-11.26)0.003
Smoking behaviors
Never142 (94.1)113 (94.2)
Ever9 (5.9)7 (5.8)1.84 (0.55-6.12)0.414
Alcohol drinking
 Never114 (75.5)114 (95.0)
 Ever 37 (24.5)6 (5.0)6.17 (2.51-15.8)0.001
Clinical and Demographic Characteristic of Study Subjects The clinical data of 151 patients with breast cancer were shown in Table 2. It found that 80 patients (53%) were highly relevant to tumors size < 2 cm., 138 patients (91.4%) were highly relevant to invasive ductal carcinoma, 82 patients (54.3%) were grade 2, 87 patients (57.6%) were positive for estrogen receptor, 87 patients (57.6%) were negative for progesterone receptor and 92 patients (60.9%) were negative for Her-2.
Table 2

Clinical Data of Breast Cancer Cases

Clinical dataNo. of breast cancer cases (Total = 151)%
Tumor size
 < 2 cm8053
 2-5 cm138.6
 > 5 cm1610.6
 N/A4227.8
Type of breast cancer
 DCIS106.6
 Invasive ductal CA13891.4
 Invasive mammary10.7
 Invasive with DCIS21.3
Grade
 142.7
 28254.3
 33724.5
 N/A2818.5
ER (estrogen receptor)
 Negative6442.4
 Positive8757.6
PR (progesterone receptor)
 Negative8757.6
 Positive6442.4
Her-2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor)
 Negative9260.9
 Positive4831.8
 N/A117.3
Clinical Data of Breast Cancer Cases

ERCC1 rs11615 variants detection in breast cancer patients and healthy controls

The study included 271 subjects with 151 breast cancer cases and 120 healthy controls. ERCC1 genotype frequency data between breast cancer cases and healthy controls were shown in Table 3. It showed that ERCC1 rs11615 AG had the highest frequency in breast cancer cases (21.8%) compared with healthy controls (7.5%). Heterozygous mutant allele affected breast cancer risk. The frequencies of ERCC1 rs11615 AA in breast cancer cases and healthy controls were 8.6% and 8.3% respectively (Table 3).
Table 3

ERCC1 Genotype Frequencies in Patients and Controls

GenotypesNo. of breast cancer patients (%)No. of healthy controls (%)Total (%)
GG105 (69.6)101 (84.2)206 (76.1)
AG33 (21.8)9 (7.5)42 (15.5)
AA13 (8.6)10 (8.3)23 (8.4)
Total151 (100)120 (100)271 (100)
ERCC1 Genotype Frequencies in Patients and Controls ERCC1 was the important risk factor in our study population. The comparison between genotype, OR and P value revealed that the ERCC1 rs11615 GG/AG genotype was the most important risk factor in this population. We found that GG/AG genotype had OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.61-7.74, P = 0.001 while AA/AG genotype had OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.28-4.24, P = 0.007 and genotype GG/AA had OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.52-2.98, P = 0.613. The ERCC1 rs11615 variant AG genotype was associated with increased breast cancer risk in our Thai population study (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison between Genotypes, OR and P Value with Breast Cancer Risk

GenotypesCrude Odds ratio95% CIP
 GG1
 AG3.531.61-7.740.001
 AA1.250.52-2.980.613
 AA, AG2.331.28-4.240.007
Comparison between Genotypes, OR and P Value with Breast Cancer Risk The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis of the effects of ERCC1 rs11615 genotypes on breast cancer risk, adjust for age, menopause period, number of child, smoking and alcohol drinking were analyzed by STATA software (Version 11.0). The ERCC1 rs11615 variant AG genotype was associated with increased breast cancer risk: OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.62-8.84, P = 0.002 (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of ERCC1 rs11516 Polymorphism for Breast Cancer Risk

GenotypesNo.of cancer patients (%)No.of healthy controls (%)Adjusted OR[(a)] (95% CI)P
GG105 (69.6)101 (84.2)1
AG33 (21.8)9 (7.5)3.79 (1.62-8.84)0.002
AA13 (8.6)10 (8.3)1.14 (0.45-2.86)0.772

Adjusted OR

for age, menopause period, number of child, smoking, drinking.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of ERCC1 rs11516 Polymorphism for Breast Cancer Risk Adjusted OR for age, menopause period, number of child, smoking, drinking.

Association between ERCC1 rs11615 variants and clinicopathological features in breast cancer

This study observed that ERCC1 rs11615 variant AG genotype was associated with increased breast cancer risk (P= 0.002) when age, menopause period, number of child, smoking and alcohol drinking were adjusted. Tumor size was not associated with ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism (P = 0.114). Invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive with DCIS could be detected in 92.3% and 7.7% respectively in breast cancer cases who had variant AG genotype of rs11615. Invasive ductal carcinoma could be detected in the breast cancer patients who had ERCC1 rs11615 genotype AG and AA variants for 92.3% and 90.9% respectively. This finding suggested that invasive ductal carcinoma was frequently occurred in ERCC1 rs11615 genotype AG and AA variants of breast cancer patients. ERCC1 rs11615 genotype AG and AA variants were associated with ER (P = 0.029). These genotype variants were not associated with PR (P = 0.090) and Her-2 (P = 0.407).

Discussion

Numerous studies revealed associations of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and cancer risk (Goode et al., 2002). The DNA repair system is complex, governed by more than 125 genes (Ng and Henikoff, 2002). The ERCC1 gene whose products are important in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and ERCC1 contains 10 exons and encodes a 297 acetaldehyde ammonia product and has been mapped to chromosome 19q13.32 which is involved in correcting the excision repair deficiency of the NER pathway (Smith et al., 2006). It is reported ERCC1 play a key role in the process of excising DNA lesion in the repair of DNA damage on the transcribed strand of the actively expressed gene and removing DNA damage from the remaining genome (Constantinou et al., 1999). Previous studies have reported about the association between variants of ERCC1 and breast cancer risk. Hosseini et al., (2012) studied about breast cancer in Iranian women and reported that ERCC1 rs3212981 A/A genotype was associated with increasing of breast cancer risk. Pei et al., (2014) studied about ERCC1 rs11615 in 417 breast cancer cases and healthy control. They reported that ERCC1 rs11615 was associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Crew et al., (2007) studied in the United States with 1053 breast cancer cases and 1102 healthy controls. They reported that ERCC1 rs3212986 C/A was associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Han et al., (2012) studied in Korean population and found that ERCC2 rs50872 TC genotype showed significant effects on breast cancer. Lee et al., (2005) reported the ERCC1 8092 AA genotype and the ERCC1 354T allele were associated with breast cancer risk. There was no association between the ERCC1 polymorphisms, the haplotype and risk of colorectal cancer by Hansen et al., (2008) study. They found that ERCC1 Asn118Asn has been associated with risk of breast cancer and lung cancer. However, the results were inconsistent with ERCC1 genotype that studied by Gomez-Diaz et al., (2015) and ERCC2 rs1799793 showed associated breast cancer in Mexico. Our present study found that ER, PR and Her-2 negative subjects by immunohistochemical staining were high in breast cancer, 42.4%, 57.6% and 60.9%, respectively. Approximately 63% of women with triple-negative breast cancer were diagnosed before age 60 years and triple-negative breast cancer may be predictive of poor response to treatment (Bauer et al., 2007). Determination of estrogen receptor (ER) of invasive breast carcinoma is useful as a prognostic and predictive factor in the management of this neoplasm. ER positivity predicts for response to endocrine therapy such as antiestrogen (tamoxifen) administration. Similarly, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2) positivity is useful for selecting targeted therapy with monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab) against Her-2. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBCs) accounting for about 15% of breast cancer and characterized by negative for ER, PR and Her-2 is associated with aggressive histology, poor prognosis and unresponsiveness to the usual endocrine therapies and survival breast cancer (Perou et al., 2000). Our study found that ERCC1 rs11615 AG genotype was associated with a 3.53 folds of breast cancer risk and adjusting for the potential risk factor of age, menopause period, number of child, smoking, alcohol drinking was associated with a 3.79 folds of breast cancer risk. ERCC1 rs11615 was associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Thai population. This is the first report about ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Thailand and Southeast Asia. Further studies with a large sample size may contribute to further elucidate the impact of ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism on the risk of breast cancer. In conclusion, the AG genotype of ERCC1 rs11615 was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Thai population.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interests.
  19 in total

1.  Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Cornelia M Ulrich; John D Potter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kyoung-Mu Lee; Ji-Yeob Choi; Changwon Kang; Changsoo Paul Kang; Sue Kyung Park; Hyunmi Cho; Dae-Yeon Cho; Keun-Young Yoo; Dong-Young Noh; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Chung-Gyu Park; Qingyi Wei; Daehee Kang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  SNP-SNP interactions between DNA repair genes were associated with breast cancer risk in a Korean population.

Authors:  Wonshik Han; Kyoung-Yeon Kim; Song-Ju Yang; Dong-Young Noh; Daehee Kang; KyuBum Kwack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Conserved residues of human XPG protein important for nuclease activity and function in nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  A Constantinou; D Gunz; E Evans; P Lalle; P A Bates; R D Wood; S G Clarkson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Impact of aging on the biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher C Benz
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew; Marilie D Gammon; Mary Beth Terry; Fang Fang Zhang; Lydia B Zablotska; Meenakshi Agrawal; Jing Shen; Chang-Min Long; Sybil M Eng; Sharon K Sagiv; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Analysis of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene variants in osteosarcoma, colorectal and breast cancer.

Authors:  Benjamín Gómez-Díaz; María DE LA Luz Ayala-Madrigal; Melva Gutiérrez-Angulo; Aura Erazo Valle-Solis; Luis Miguel Linares-González; Roberto González-Guzmán; David Cruz-Guillén; Ana Lilia Cedeño-Garcidueñas; Patricia Canto; Luz Berenice López-Hernández
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  ERCC1 and ERCC2 haplotype modulates induced BPDE-DNA adducts in primary cultured lymphocytes.

Authors:  Xiaobo Lu; Yanhua Liu; Tao Yu; Sha Xiao; Xiaoyan Bao; Liang Pan; Guolian Zhu; Yuan Cai; Qiufang Liu; Cuihong Jin; Jinghua Yang; Shengwen Wu; Li An; Tahar van der Straaten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contribution of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 genotypes to triple negative breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Chia-Wen Tsai; Wen-Shin Chang; Te-Chun Shen; Chen-Hsien Su; Hwei-Chung Wang; Liang-Chih Liu; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism increases susceptibility to breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 4547 individuals.

Authors:  Bingjie Li; Xiaoqing Shi; Yingying Yuan; Mengle Peng; Huifang Jin; Dongchun Qin
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.976

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.