Literature DB >> 29170711

Correlation of Planned Dose to Area Postrema and Dorsal Vagal Complex with Clinical Symptoms of Nausea and Vomiting in Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) patients treated with radiation alone using IMRT.

Tony J C Wang1, Sandra Fontenla2, Patrick McCann2, Robert J Young3, Stephen McNamara2, Shyam Rao4, James G Mechalakos2, Nancy Y Lee4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the planned dose to the nausea center (NC) - area postrema (AP) and dorsal vagal complex (DVC) - with nausea and vomiting symptoms in OPC patients treated with IMRT without chemotherapy. We also investigated whether it was possible to reduce doses to the NC without significant degradation of the clinically accepted treatment plan.
METHODS: From 11/04 to 4/09, 37 OPC patients were treated with definitive or adjuvant IMRT without chemotherapy. Of these, only 23 patients had restorable plans and were included in this analysis. We contoured the NC with the assistance of an expert board-certified neuroradiologist. We searched for correlation between the delivered dose to the NC and patient-reported nausea and vomiting during IMRT. We used one-paired t-test: two-sample assuming equal variances to compare differences in dose to NC between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. We then replanned each case to determine if reduced dose to the NC could be achieved without compromising coverage to target volumes, increasing unwarranted hotspots or increasing dose to surrounding critical normal tissues.
RESULTS: Acute symptoms of nausea were as follows: Grade 0 (n=6), Grade 1 (n=13), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 3 (n=1). Patients with no complaints of nausea had a median dose to the DVC of 34.2 Gy (range 4.6-46.6 Gy) and AP of 32.6 Gy (range 7.0-41.4Gy); whereas those with any complaints of nausea had a median DVC dose of 40.4 Gy (range 19.3-49.4 Gy) and AP dose of 38.7 Gy (range 16.7-46.8 Gy) (p=0.04). Acute vomiting was as follows: Grade 0 (n=17), Grade 1 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=1), and Grade 3 (n=1). There was no significant difference in DVC or AP dose among those with and without vomiting symptoms (p=0.28).Upon replanning of each case to minimize dose to the NC, we were, on average, able to reduce the radiation dose to AP by 18% and DVC by 17%; while the average dose variations to the PTV coverage, brainstem, cord, temporal lobes, and cochlea were never greater than 3%. Hotspots increased by 2% for 3 patients while hotspots for remaining patients were less than 2% variation.
CONCLUSION: For OPC cancer patients treated with IMRT without chemotherapy, dose to AP and DVC may be associated with development of nausea. We were able to show that reducing doses substantially to the NC is achievable without significant alteration of the clinically accepted plan and may reduce the incidence and grade of nausea. As symptoms of nausea can be devastating to patients, one can consider routine contouring and constraining of the NC to minimize chances of having this complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting; area postrema; dorsal vagal complex; head and neck; intensity modulated radiation therapy

Year:  2013        PMID: 29170711      PMCID: PMC5697739          DOI: 10.1007/s13566-013-0094-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1948-7908


  18 in total

1.  Dose-volume complication analysis for visual pathway structures of patients with advanced paranasal sinus tumors.

Authors:  M K Martel; H M Sandler; W T Cornblath; L H Marsh; M B Hazuka; W H Roa; B A Fraass; A S Lichter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Avraham Eisbruch; Marc Hamoir; Peter Levendag
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  The impact of dose on parotid salivary recovery in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yun Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Factors associated with radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Alan T Monroe; Sathya C Reddy; Gregory L Gibbs; Gerald A White; Anuj V Peddada
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Evaluation of trends in the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer from 2000 through 2005: socioeconomic disparity and geographic variation in a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Chih-Chin Liu; Janice N Cormier; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Susan Urba
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  A prospective observational trial on emesis in radiotherapy: analysis of 1020 patients recruited in 45 Italian radiation oncology centres.

Authors:  Ernesto Maranzano; Verena De Angelis; Stefano Pergolizzi; Marco Lupattelli; Paolo Frata; Stefano Spagnesi; Maria Luisa Frisio; Giovanni Mandoliti; Giuseppe Malinverni; Fabio Trippa; Letizia Fabbietti; Salvatore Parisi; Annamaria Di Palma; Pietro De Vecchi; Costantino De Renzis; Celestino Giorgetti; Tiziano Bergami; Roberto Orecchia; Maurizio Portaluri; Marco Signor; Davide Di Gennaro
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Atlas-based delineation of lymph node levels in head and neck computed tomography images.

Authors:  Olivier Commowick; Vincent Grégoire; Grégoire Malandain
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  The area postrema and vomiting.

Authors:  A D Miller; R A Leslie
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Radiation doses to structures within and adjacent to the larynx are correlated with long-term diet- and speech-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ken Dornfeld; Joel R Simmons; Lucy Karnell; Michael Karnell; Gerry Funk; Min Yao; Judith Wacha; Bridget Zimmerman; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Calcitonin Receptor Neurons in the Mouse Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Control Energy Balance via the Non-aversive Suppression of Feeding.

Authors:  Wenwen Cheng; Ian Gonzalez; Warren Pan; Anthony H Tsang; Jessica Adams; Ermelinda Ndoka; Desiree Gordian; Basma Khoury; Karen Roelofs; Simon S Evers; Andrew MacKinnon; Shuangcheng Wu; Henriette Frikke-Schmidt; Jonathan N Flak; James L Trevaskis; Christopher J Rhodes; So-Ichiro Fukada; Randy J Seeley; Darleen A Sandoval; David P Olson; Clemence Blouet; Martin G Myers
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 27.287

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.