Tsutomu Akama1, Yong-Kang Zhang1, Yvonne R Freund1, Pamela Berry1, Joanne Lee1, Eric E Easom1, Robert T Jacobs1, Jacob J Plattner1, Michael J Witty2, Rosemary Peter3, Tim G Rowan3, Kirsten Gillingwater4, Reto Brun4, Bakela Nare5, Luke Mercer5, Musheng Xu6, Jiangong Wang6, Hao Liang6. 1. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1020 E. Meadow Circle, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. 2. Global Alliance for Livestock and Veterinary Medicine, Doherty Building, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0PZ, UK. Electronic address: michael.witty@galvmed.org. 3. Global Alliance for Livestock and Veterinary Medicine, Doherty Building, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0PZ, UK. 4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003 Basel, Switzerland. 5. Avista Pharma Solutions, 350 Tricenter Boulevard, Suite C, Durham, NC 27713, USA. 6. Wuxi AppTec (Tianjin) Co. Ltd., No. 168 NanHai Road, 10th Avenue, TEDA, Tianjin 300457, PR China.
Abstract
Novel l-valinate amide benzoxaboroles and analogues were designed and synthesized for a structure-activity-relationship (SAR) investigation to optimize the growth inhibitory activity against Trypanosoma congolense (T. congolense) and Trypanosoma vivax (T. vivax) parasites. The study identified 4-fluorobenzyl (1-hydroxy-7-methyl-1,3-dihydrobenzo[c][1,2]oxaborole-6-carbonyl)-l-valinate (5, AN11736), which showed IC50 values of 0.15 nM against T. congolense and 1.3 nM against T. vivax, and demonstrated 100% efficacy with a single dose of 10 mg/kg against both T. congolense and T. vivax in mouse models of infection (IP dosing) and in the target animal, cattle, dosed intramuscularly. AN11736 has been advanced to early development studies.
Novel l-valinate amide benzoxaboroles and analogues were designed and synthesized for a structure-activity-relationship (SAR) investigation to optimize the growth inhibitory activity against Trypanosoma congolense (T. congolense) and Trypanosoma vivax (T. vivax) parasites. The study identified 4-fluorobenzyl (1-hydroxy-7-methyl-1,3-dihydrobenzo[c][1,2]oxaborole-6-carbonyl)-l-valinate (5, AN11736), which showed IC50 values of 0.15 nM against T. congolense and 1.3 nM against T. vivax, and demonstrated 100% efficacy with a single dose of 10 mg/kg against both T. congolense and T. vivax in mouse models of infection (IP dosing) and in the target animal, cattle, dosed intramuscularly. AN11736 has been advanced to early development studies.
Animal African Trypanosomiasis (AAT) is a fatal, parasitic wasting disease of livestock and wild animals in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is caused primarily by the two protozoan parasites Trypanosoma congolense (T. congolense) and Trypanosoma vivax (T. vivax), which are transmitted by tsetse flies. AAT is responsible for 3 million cattle deaths annually and costs African livestock farmers approximately US$ 1–5 billion per year. The current standard-of-care drugs, such as diminazene aceturate, isometamidium and homidium chloride, have been in use for several decades and are often ineffective with drug resistance becoming an increasing concern. No new trypanocides have been approved for use in cattle for many years. Initial screening of the Anacor Pharmaceuticals library of novel boron-containing compounds identified an active compound (1, Fig. 1), which had an IC50 = 5 nM against T. congolense and 69 nM against T. vivax while its enantiomer was much less active. A quick and simple modification on the amino acid side chain with an isopropyl group generated 2 (Fig. 1) with improved in vitro potency (IC50 = 2 nM against both T. congolense and T. vivax). This encouraging result prompted us to investigate this chemical series further. We designed and synthesized a series of novel benzoxaboroles (3–71, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8) to optimize anti-parasitic activity, physicochemical and in vitro ADME properties, and the pharmacokinetic profile. Specifically, these molecules were designed to examine the effects of oxaborole 3-substituent variation (3 vs 2, Fig. 1, Fig. 2), oxaborole 7-substituent variation (4 vs 2, Fig. 1, Fig. 2; 5 vs 20–27, Fig. 4), substituent changes on the benzyl group (5–19, Fig. 3), modification of the amino acid (28–32, Fig. 5), heteroaromatic methyl esters (33–48, Fig. 6), introduction of water-solubilizing scaffolds to the benzyl group (49–54, Fig. 7) and aliphatic esters (55–71, Fig. 8). Herein, we report the synthesis and antiparasitic activity against T. congolense and T. vivax of these novel compounds.
Fig. 1
Chemical structures of early hits (1 and 2).
Fig. 2
Structures of benzoxaboroles with additional 3,3-Me2 (3) or 7-Me (4) modification as compared to analog 2.
Fig. 3
Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of substituents on the benzyl ring (5–19) as compared to analog 4.
Fig. 4
Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of 7-substituents on the benzene ring (20–27) as compared to analog 5.
Fig. 5
Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation on the amino acid side chain (28–32) as compared to analog 5.
Fig. 6
Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of the left side arylmethyl groups (33–48) as compared to analog 5.
Fig. 7
Structures of benzoxaboroles with water-solubilizing scaffolds on the benzyl ring (49–54) as compared to analog 5.
Fig. 8
Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of the left side aliphatic ester groups (55–71) as compared to analog 5.
Chemical structures of early hits (1 and 2).Structures of benzoxaboroles with additional 3,3-Me2 (3) or 7-Me (4) modification as compared to analog 2.Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of substituents on the benzyl ring (5–19) as compared to analog 4.Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of 7-substituents on the benzene ring (20–27) as compared to analog 5.Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation on the amino acid side chain (28–32) as compared to analog 5.Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of the left side arylmethyl groups (33–48) as compared to analog 5.Structures of benzoxaboroles with water-solubilizing scaffolds on the benzyl ring (49–54) as compared to analog 5.Structures of benzoxaboroles with variation of the left side aliphatic ester groups (55–71) as compared to analog 5.Compounds 1–71 were convergently synthesized from three building blocks: the left side alcohols (72), amino acid linkers (73) and benzoxaborole 6-carboxylic acids (76).3, 4 The general synthetic route is shown in Scheme 1. Reaction of alcohols 72 with N-Boc protected amino acids 73 gave ester intermediates 74, which were treated with dry hydrogen chloride to generate esteramine salts 75. Condensation of these amine salts 75 with benzoxaborole 6-carboxylic acids 76 provided the final compounds 1–71.
Scheme 1
General route for syntheses of 1–71. Reagents and conditions: (a) DCC, DMAP, DCM, 0–20 °C, 16 h; (b) HCl/EtOAc, 20 °C, 5 h; (c) HOBt, EDCI, TEA, DCM, 0–20 °C, 15 h.
General route for syntheses of 1–71. Reagents and conditions: (a) DCC, DMAP, DCM, 0–20 °C, 16 h; (b) HCl/EtOAc, 20 °C, 5 h; (c) HOBt, EDCI, TEA, DCM, 0–20 °C, 15 h.Scheme 2 illustrates the synthesis of 1-hydroxy-7-methyl-1,3-dihydrobenzo[c][1,2]oxaborole-6-carboxylic acid (83) as an example of key boron intermediates. Esterification of the acid 77 produced the ester 78, which was formylated to yield 79. Treatment of 79 with trifluoromethyl sulfonyl anhydride afforded the triflate compound 80, which was converted to the pinacol boron intermediate 81. Reduction of 81 and subsequent cyclization under aqueous acidic conditions generated the benzoxaborole ester 82. Hydrolysis of the ester group in 82 afforded the acid 83. The experimental procedures for the synthesis of 5 are described in the reference and note section.
Scheme 2
Synthetic route for preparation of 83. Reagents and conditions: (a) H2SO4, EtOH, reflux, 24 h; (b) MgCl2, (CH2O)n, TEA, THF, reflux, 14 h; (c) Tf2O, pyridine, DMAP, DCM, 0–15 °C, 1 h; (d) Pin2B2, KOAc, Pd(dppf)Cl2, 1,4-dioxane, N2, 85 °C, 15 h; (e) NaBH4, MeOH, THF, 0–15 °C, 1 h, then HCl, H2O; (f) NaOH,H2O, 40 °C, 3 h, then HCl for acidification.
Synthetic route for preparation of 83. Reagents and conditions: (a) H2SO4, EtOH, reflux, 24 h; (b) MgCl2, (CH2O)n, TEA, THF, reflux, 14 h; (c) Tf2O, pyridine, DMAP, DCM, 0–15 °C, 1 h; (d) Pin2B2, KOAc, Pd(dppf)Cl2, 1,4-dioxane, N2, 85 °C, 15 h; (e) NaBH4, MeOH, THF, 0–15 °C, 1 h, then HCl, H2O; (f) NaOH,H2O, 40 °C, 3 h, then HCl for acidification.Activity of compounds 1–71 against T. congolense and T. vivax was determined using the whole cell assays as described 6 and their IC50 values are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Activity of compounds 1–71 against T. congolense (T. c.) and T. vivax (T. v.).a
Compound
IC50 (nM)
Compound
IC50 (nM)
T. c.
T. v.
T. c.
T. v.
1
4.9
69
37
0.78
0.50
2
2.0
2.0
38
0.68
0.31
3
2580
9190
39
0.57
0.24
4
0.46
0.79
40
0.27
0.50
5
0.14
1.3
41
0.78
0.11
6
0.47
2.9
42
0.20
0.19
7
0.59
0.10
43
0.062
NTb
8
0.28
0.07
44
5000
980
9
0.18
0.10
45
0.37
0.33
10
0.22
2.7
46
0.42
0.24
11
0.16
24
47
0.20
0.081
12
0.31
19
48
<0.005
0.71
13
0.23
0.04
49
0.39
68
14
0.10
0.06
50
0.32
0.48
15
0.15
0.05
51
0.25
0.21
16
0.08
0.07
52
1.3
0.29
17
0.21
0.04
53
0.51
0.35
18
0.20
0.06
54
1.0
0.37
19
0.61
0.44
55
4.2
3.3
20
3.0
1.0
56
5.2
14
21
28
NTb
57
0.46
0.26
22
0.67
0.92
58
0.66
0.69
23
37
51
59
0.70
0.52
24
0.11
0.05
60
<0.005
0.78
25
3.0
4.7
61
0.36
0.21
26
2.3
0.05
62
0.38
0.16
27
3.9
0.71
63
0.39
0.09
28
0.12
0.38
64
2.3
0.78
29
0.26
0.10
65
9.4
1.2
30
0.09
0.25
66
5.9
4.1
31
0.13
18
67
0.43
0.79
32
0.45
2.5
68
1.8
37
33
0.28
26
69
0.47
1.6
34
0.14
0.07
70
0.34
2.28
35
0.15
0.09
71
0.2
0.14
36
0.26
0.14
Experimental procedures are described in the reference and note section.
NT = Not tested.
Activity of compounds 1–71 against T. congolense (T. c.) and T. vivax (T. v.).aExperimental procedures are described in the reference and note section.NT = Not tested.Lead compound 2 exhibited an IC50 of 2 nM against both T. congolense and T. vivax. The 3,3-dimethyl analog 3 was essentially inactive (IC50 = 2580 nM against T. c. and 9190 nM against T. v.) but better activity was observed for the 7-methyl analog 4 (IC50 = 0.46 nM against T. c. and 0.79 nM against T. v.). We focused future SAR development on compounds incorporating the 7-methyl group, as in vivo activity of 4 was superior to that observed for 2
(vide infra). A wide range of substituents, such as halogens, trifluoromethyl, trifluoromethoxy, cyano and methylsulfonyl (5–19 in Fig. 3) on the benzyl ring were introduced to examine their effects on the antiparasitic activity. The majority of these fifteen compounds, with exception of 11 and 12, were very potent showing IC50 values around 1 nM (see Table 1). We next explored variation of the substituent at the 7-position of benzoxaborole (20–27 in Fig. 4). The difluoromethyl (22) and ethyl (24) analogs had similar activity to that of 5, but the electron-withdrawing fluoro (21) and trifluoromethyl (23) analogs were of significantly reduced potency. The amino acid linker was also modified (Fig. 5), with the cyclopropyl (28), 2-hydroxyisopropyl (29), 2-fluoroisopropyl (30) and spirocyclobutyl (32) analogs exhibiting potency similar to 5, but the spirocyclopropyl analog (31) exhibited decreased activity against T. v. parasite. Replacement of the 4-fluorophenyl in 5 with various heteroaryl groups (33–48, Fig. 6) resulted in the excellent activity in all cases except the NH-imidazole analog 44. Introduction of basic nitrogen-containing groups on the benzyl ester (49–54, Fig. 7) provided compounds 50–54 that were generally similar to 5. Lastly, aliphatic and heterocyclicesters (55–71, Fig. 8) were synthesized and many of these had IC50 values less than 1 nM as shown in Table 1.Selected compounds were screened in both mouse and bovine in vitro metabolic stability assays (mouse S9 and bovine S9), as summarized in Table 2. These two species were chosen because the primary in vivo assays were conducted in mice, and the target animal of this research program is cattle. As shown in Table 2, out of 36 compounds tested, 27 compounds had Clint < 10 µL/min/mg protein in both mouse and bovine S9 assays suggesting moderate to excellent in vitro metabolic stability. We evaluated the efficacy of selected compounds in two in vivo mouse models of infection, against T. congolense and T. vivax, respectively. Mice were infected with either 1 × 105
T. c. parasites or 1 × 104 T. v. parasites, and then treated with a test compound via intraperitoneal administration for 1, 2 or 4 consecutive days. The mice were then monitored for the presence of parasitemia for up to 60 days post treatment. We tested in T. c. model first, then followed up with T. v. for interesting compounds. As shown in Table 2, the 7-methyl analog 4 was superior to the 7-unsubstituted analog 2 in both T. c. and T. v. mouse models of infection. Of the 38 compounds tested with the in vivo mouse models, seven compounds (5, 8, 33, 34, 49, 62 and 71) demonstrated ≥50% curative efficacy in the T. c.-infected mouse model and 100% curative efficacy in the T. v.-infected mouse model, when tested as a single dose of 10 mg/kg. To select further from these seven compounds, four (5, 8, 33 and 71) had ≥75% curative efficacy in the T. c.-infected mouse model at a single dose of 10 mg/kg, and two (5 and 8) showed 100% curative efficacy. These two compounds were further tested at a single 5 mg/kg dose, but were unable to cure the T. c.-infected mice. We selected compound 5 (AN11736) to progress to exploratory studies to determine the efficacy and safety in a preliminary formulation against induced infections of T. vivax and T. congolense in cattle.
AN11736 demonstrated 100% curative efficacy with a single intramuscular injection of 10 mg/kg against both T. congolense and T. vivax in cattle.
Table 2
In vitro metabolic stability and in vivo mouse efficacy of selected compounds.a
Compound
Clint (µL/min/mg protein)
Efficacy in mouse modelb
Mouse S9
Bovine S9
T. c.
T. v.
2
NTc
NTc
0/5 (2 × 10)
5/5 (4 × 10)1/5 (1 × 10)
4
NTc
NTc
4/5 (2 × 10)
5/5 (2 × 10)4/4 (1 × 10)
5
5.4
9.3
5/5 (2 × 10)4/4 (1 × 10)0/4 (1 × 5)
5/5 (2 × 10)5/5 (1 × 10)4/4 (1 × 10)
6
17
9.1
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
8
7.9
5.6
4/4 (1 × 10)0/4 (1 × 5)
4/4 (1 × 10)
14
9.1
2.7
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
16
15
8.9
4/4 (2 × 10)1/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
17
14
10
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
18
9.7
3.1
1/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
19
2.6
1.3
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
20
1.5
1.3
0/5 (4 × 10)
NTc
21
<1
<1
1/4 (2 × 10)
4/4 (2 × 10)
22
1.4
0.9
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
24
21
23
1/4 (2 × 10)
NTc
26
32
32
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
29
<1
<1
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
30
3.7
3.1
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
31
<1
<1
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
33
6.3
2.0
3/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
34
11.8
4.8
2/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
35
5.2
7.8
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
39
1.6
3.9
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
41
1.3
1.8
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
46
7.4
7.0
1/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
47
4.8
10
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
48
4.0
23
1/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
49
1.5
4.0
2/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
50
8.6
12.7
1/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
51
1.8
5.0
0/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
52
1.8
6.0
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
53
5.4
6.8
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
54
5.5
3.8
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
55
<1
3.1
0/4 (1 × 10)
NTc
62
10
20
2/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
63
0.9
1.5
1/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
69
0.7
0.6
1/4 (1 × 10)
1/4 (1 × 10)
70
1.5
0.3
1/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
71
6.4
8.1
3/4 (1 × 10)
4/4 (1 × 10)
Methods for testing compound efficacy in mouse models are described in the reference and note section.
The efficacy data in the table is presented as n/m (q × 10), where n = number of mice survived, m = total number of mice in the study group, q = how many time dosed, and 10 = 10 mg/kg.
NT = Not tested.
In vitro metabolic stability and in vivo mouse efficacy of selected compounds.aMethods for testing compound efficacy in mouse models are described in the reference and note section.The efficacy data in the table is presented as n/m (q × 10), where n = number of mice survived, m = total number of mice in the study group, q = how many time dosed, and 10 = 10 mg/kg.NT = Not tested.In summary, a novel series of -valinate amide benzoxaboroles was discovered to be active against T. congolense and T. vivax, which are the main causative agents of Animal African Trypanosomiasis (AAT) in cattle. Two compounds (5 and 8) showed 100% curative efficacy in both T. c.- and T. v.-infected mice with a single dose of 10 mg/kg. Compound 5 (AN11736) demonstrated 100% curative efficacy with a single IM dose of 10 mg/kg against both T. congolense and T. vivax in cattle for a duration of 100 days. AN11736, as a novel chemical entity, was selected as a potential developmental candidate for the treatment of AAT.
Authors: Xianfeng Li; Suoming Zhang; Yong-Kang Zhang; Yang Liu; Charles Z Ding; Yasheen Zhou; Jacob J Plattner; Stephen J Baker; Wei Bu; Liang Liu; Wieslaw M Kazmierski; Maosheng Duan; Richard M Grimes; Lois L Wright; Gary K Smith; Richard L Jarvest; Jing-Jing Ji; Joel P Cooper; Matthew D Tallant; Renae M Crosby; Katrina Creech; Zhi-Jie Ni; Wuxin Zou; Jon Wright Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Charles Z Ding; Yong-Kang Zhang; Xianfeng Li; Yang Liu; Suoming Zhang; Yasheen Zhou; Jacob J Plattner; Stephen J Baker; Liang Liu; Maosheng Duan; Richard L Jarvest; Jingjing Ji; Wieslaw M Kazmierski; Matthew D Tallant; Lois L Wright; Gary K Smith; Renae M Crosby; Amy A Wang; Zhi-Jie Ni; Wuxin Zou; Jon Wright Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Federica Giordani; Liam J Morrison; Tim G Rowan; Harry P DE Koning; Michael P Barrett Journal: Parasitology Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Pingyuan Wang; Paul A Wadsworth; Nolan M Dvorak; Aditya K Singh; Haiying Chen; Zhiqing Liu; Richard Zhou; Luis Marcelo F Holthauzen; Jia Zhou; Fernanda Laezza Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Christopher S Lunde; Erin E Stebbins; Rajiv S Jumani; Md Mahmudul Hasan; Peter Miller; John Barlow; Yvonne R Freund; Pamela Berry; Rianna Stefanakis; Jiri Gut; Philip J Rosenthal; Melissa S Love; Case W McNamara; Eric Easom; Jacob J Plattner; Robert T Jacobs; Christopher D Huston Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: David S Carter; Robert T Jacobs; Yvonne R Freund; Pamela W Berry; Tsutomu Akama; Eric E Easom; Christopher S Lunde; Fernando Rock; Rianna Stefanakis; James McKerrow; Chelsea Fischer; Christina A Bulman; Kee Chong Lim; Brian M Suzuki; Nancy Tricoche; Judy A Sakanari; Sara Lustigman; Jacob J Plattner Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Tsutomu Akama; Yvonne R Freund; Pamela W Berry; David S Carter; Eric E Easom; Kurt Jarnagin; Christopher S Lunde; Jacob J Plattner; Fernando Rock; Rianna Stefanakis; Chelsea Fischer; Christina A Bulman; Kee Chong Lim; Brian M Suzuki; Nancy Tricoche; Abdelmoneim Mansour; Utami DiCosty; Scott McCall; Ben Carson; John W McCall; James McKerrow; Marc P Hübner; Sabine Specht; Achim Hoerauf; Sara Lustigman; Judy A Sakanari; Robert T Jacobs Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Richard J Wall; Eva Rico; Iva Lukac; Fabio Zuccotto; Sara Elg; Ian H Gilbert; Yvonne Freund; M R K Alley; Mark C Field; Susan Wyllie; David Horn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Zoltner; Gustavo D Campagnaro; Gergana Taleva; Alana Burrell; Michela Cerone; Ka-Fai Leung; Fiona Achcar; David Horn; Sue Vaughan; Catarina Gadelha; Alena Zíková; Michael P Barrett; Harry P de Koning; Mark C Field Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Emily A Dickie; Federica Giordani; Matthew K Gould; Pascal Mäser; Christian Burri; Jeremy C Mottram; Srinivasa P S Rao; Michael P Barrett Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Federica Giordani; Daniel Paape; Isabel M Vincent; Andrew W Pountain; Fernando Fernández-Cortés; Eva Rico; Ning Zhang; Liam J Morrison; Yvonne Freund; Michael J Witty; Rosemary Peter; Darren Y Edwards; Jonathan M Wilkes; Justin J J van der Hooft; Clément Regnault; Kevin D Read; David Horn; Mark C Field; Michael P Barrett Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 6.823