| Literature DB >> 31876154 |
Tsutomu Akama1, Yvonne R Freund1, Pamela W Berry1, David S Carter1, Eric E Easom1, Kurt Jarnagin1, Christopher S Lunde1, Jacob J Plattner1, Fernando Rock1, Rianna Stefanakis1, Chelsea Fischer2, Christina A Bulman2, Kee Chong Lim2, Brian M Suzuki3, Nancy Tricoche4, Abdelmoneim Mansour5, Utami DiCosty5, Scott McCall5, Ben Carson5, John W McCall5, James McKerrow3, Marc P Hübner6, Sabine Specht6,7, Achim Hoerauf6, Sara Lustigman4, Judy A Sakanari2, Robert T Jacobs1.
Abstract
A series of benzimidazole-benzoxaborole hybrid molecules linked via an amide linker are described that exhibit good in vitro activity against Onchocerca volvulus, a filarial nematode responsible for the disease onchocerciasis, also known as river blindness. The lead identified in this series, 8a (AN8799), was found to have acceptable pharmacokinetic properties to enable evaluation in animal models of human filariasis. Compound 8a was effective in killing Brugia malayi, B. pahangi, and Litomosoides sigmodontis worms present in Mongolian gerbils when dosed subcutaneously as a suspension at 100 mg/kg/day for 14 days but not when dosed orally at 100 mg/kg/day for 28 days. The measurement of plasma levels of 8a at the end of the dosing period and at the time of sacrifice revealed an interesting dependence of activity on the extended exposure for both 8a and the positive control, flubendazole.Entities:
Keywords: flubendazole; lymphatic filariasis; onchocerciasis; organoboron; tubulin
Year: 2020 PMID: 31876154 PMCID: PMC7026885 DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Infect Dis ISSN: 2373-8227 Impact factor: 5.084
Figure 1Structure of flubendazole.
Figure 2Equilibrium between three-coordinate, neutral benzoxaborole and four-coordinate, negatively charged benzoxaborole.
Figure 3Strategy for the preparation of the initial benzoxaborole–benzimidazole hybrids.
Initial Benzoxaborole–Benzimidazole Amide Leadsa
| ID | link atom | R | G2/M arrest IC50 (μM)[ | MDCK-MDR1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | NA | NA | 0.004 | 0.67 | 15.6 | |
| 6 | 0 | 4.55 | >100 | NT | ||
| 6 | 0 | 3,3-Me2 | >10 | NT | NT | |
| 6 | 1 | 3,3-Me2 | 0.300 | 13 | 0.8 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0.426 | 10 | NT | ||
| 6 | 1 | 0.421 | >100 | NT | ||
| 5 | 1 | 3,3-Me2 | 0.042 | 2.54 | 0.5 | |
| 6 | 2 | 3,3-Me2 | 0.004 | 0.555 | 0.7 | |
| 6 | 0 | 3,3-Me2 | >10 | >100 | NT |
NT = not tested.
In Vivo Efficacy and Terminal Plasma Concentrations of 8a and Flubendazolea
| drug
concentration (μM) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| drug treatment | worm count median ± SEM (range) | adult worm reduction/animals with no worms | 24 h after last dose | interim | necropsy | ||
| vehicle (SC study), | 12 ± 0.73 (11–15) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| flubendazole, 10 mg/kg × 5 days, QD, SC, | 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 100%/100% | 0.0001 | 0.173 | NM | 0.043 | |
| 2 ± 2.14 (0–12) | 83.3%/50% | 0.0622 | 2.47 | 0.07 (day 28) | 0.01 | ||
| 0 ± 0.19 (0–3) | 100%/87.5% | 0.0001 | 4.10 | 5.36 (day 28) | 3.38 | ||
| vehicle
(PO study), | 8 ± 0.81 (5–10) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| 7 ± 1.38 (4–16) | 12.5%/0% | 0.9999 | 0.128 | NM | <LOQ | ||
| vehicle | 89 ± 12.79 (64–146) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| flubendazole, 10 mg/kg × 5 days, QD, SC | 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 100%/100% | 0.0009 | 0.178 | NM | 0.018 | |
| 0 ± 0.333 (0–2) | 100%/83% | 0.0024 | 5.87 | NM | 1.15 | ||
| 67.5 ± 14.86 (2–114) | 24%/0% | 0.9999 | 0.13 | NM | <LOQ | ||
| vehicle | 8.5 ± 3.28 (5–20) | N/A | N/A | ||||
| flubendazole, 10 mg/kg × 5 days, QD, SC | 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 100%/100% | 0.0208 | 0.283 | NM | 0.040 | |
| 0 ± 0.34 (0–2) | 100%/33.3% | 0.1207 | 9.30 | NM | 0.069 | ||
| 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 100%/100% | 0.0208 | 7.85 | 10.6 (day 21) | 0.48 | ||
| 4.64 (day 42) | |||||||
| 20 ± 6.92 (5–50) | –135.3%/0% | 0.999 | 0.210 | 0.006 (day 42) | 0.003 | ||
NM = not measured. N/A = not applicable. Statistical significance was tested by Kruskal–Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.
Analogs Designed To Overcome the Permeability Challenge
| ID | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | G2/M IC50 (μM) | MDCK-MDR1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | H | H | H | H | 0.300 | 13 | 0.8 | |
| CH3 | H | H | H | H | 24% | >100 | 1.2 | |
| H | H | CH3 | H | H | 29% | >100 | 1.8 | |
| H | CH3 | H | H | H | NT | 4.1 | 0.6 | |
| H | CH2CH2NMe2 | H | H | H | NT | 35 | 0.14 | |
| H | H | H | F | H | 0% | 16 | 2.35 | |
| H | H | H | H | F | 0.13 | 1.26 | 2.83 |
% of O. volvulus larvae that completed molting from L3 to L4 compared to control worms.