Literature DB >> 29168992

Why it is nonsensical to use retrospective power analyses to conduct a postmortem on your study.

Michael R Jiroutek1, J Rick Turner2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29168992      PMCID： PMC8030883          DOI： 10.1111/jch.13173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN： 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  D G Altman; K F Schulz; D Moher; M Egger; F Davidoff; D Elbourne; P C Gøtzsche; T Lang
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies.

Authors:  Stephen J Senn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

3.  Reporting statistical information in medical journal articles.

Authors:  Peter Cummings; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-04

4.  Statistical power calculations.

Authors:  R V Lenth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  The overemphasis on power analysis.

Authors:  T R Knapp
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Understanding sample size determination in nursing research.

Authors:  Matthew J Hayat
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.

Authors:  S N Goodman; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Buying a significant result: Do we need to reconsider the role of the P value?

Authors:  Michael R Jiroutek; J Rick Turner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  In Praise of Confidence Intervals: Much More Informative Than P Values Alone.

Authors:  Michael R Jiroutek; J Rick Turner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.738
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.

Authors:  Benny Brandt; Vasileios Sioulas; Derman Basaran; Theresa Kuhn; Katherine LaVigne; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi; Kara C Long Roche; Jennifer J Mueller; Elizabeth L Jewell; Vance A Broach; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Comment on: "Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"

Authors:  Axel Krebs-Brown; Alain Munafo; Sumedh Gaikwad; Bogumila Urgatz; Claire Castello-Bridoux
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.