Literature DB >> 12458264

Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies.

Stephen J Senn.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12458264      PMCID： PMC1124761     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Peer review of statistics in medical research. Journal reviewers are even more baffled by sample size issues than grant proposal reviewers.

Authors:  Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-31
  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Small sample size is not the real problem.

Authors:  Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The Type and Amount of Dietary Fat Affect Plasma Factor VIIc, Fibrinogen, and PAI-1 in Healthy Individuals and Individuals at High Cardiovascular Disease Risk: 2 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Penny M Kris-Etherton; Paul W Stewart; Henry N Ginsberg; Russell P Tracy; Michael Lefevre; Patricia J Elmer; Lars Berglund; Abby G Ershow; Thomas A Pearson; Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan; Stephen F Holleran; Barbara H Dennis; Catherine M Champagne; Wahida Karmally
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Reply to Karch et al.

Authors:  Hiroyu Hatano; Peter Bacchetti; Priscilla Y Hsue; Steven G Deeks
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Directional interconnectivity of the human amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and orbitofrontal cortex in emotional scene perception.

Authors:  David W Frank; Vincent D Costa; Bruno B Averbeck; Dean Sabatinelli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives.

Authors:  Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Response to Comment on: "Attempting to Separate Placebo Effects from Exercise in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".

Authors:  Patrick J Owen; Tobias Saueressig; Daniel L Belavy; Christian A Than; Jake Ball; Kate Sadler; Alessandro Piedimonte; Fabrizio Benedetti; Clint T Miller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 11.928

7.  Why it is nonsensical to use retrospective power analyses to conduct a postmortem on your study.

Authors:  Michael R Jiroutek; J Rick Turner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Noise as a risk factor in the delivery room: A clinical study.

Authors:  Kristiane Roed Jensen; Lone Hvidman; Ole Kierkegaard; Henrik Gliese; Tanja Manser; Niels Uldbjerg; Lise Brogaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Favourable serum calcification propensity with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous insulin administration in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter R van Dijk; Femke Waanders; Andreas Pasch; Susan J J Logtenberg; Titia Vriesendorp; Klaas H Groenier; Jan-Luuk Hillebrands; Nanno Kleefstra; Rijk O B Gans; Harry van Goor; Henk J G Bilo
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.565

10.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Stephen J Senn; Kenneth J Rothman; John B Carlin; Charles Poole; Steven N Goodman; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 8.082
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.