Literature DB >> 29168126

Do alerting signals increase the size of the attentional focus?

Verena C Seibold1.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the presentation of an auditory alerting signal before a visual target increases the interference from flanking distractors. Recently, it has been suggested that this increase in interference may be due to an expansion of the spatial focus of attention. In five experiments, this hypothesis was tested by using a probe technique dedicated to measuring variations in the size of the attentional focus: In the majority of trials, participants performed a letter discrimination task in which their attention was focused on a central target letter. In a randomly intermixed probe task, the size of the attentional focus was measured by letting participants respond to a probe occurring at varying positions. In all experiments, reaction time (RT) to the probe increased from the most central to more lateral probe positions. This V-shaped probe-RT function, however, was not flattened by the presentation of an alerting signal. Overall, this pattern of results is inconsistent with the hypothesis that alerting signals increase the attentional focus. Instead, it is consistent with nonspatial accounts that attribute the increase in interference to an alerting effect on perceptual processing, which then leads to a detrimental effect at the level of response selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Executive control; Perception and action

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29168126     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1451-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control.

Authors:  Anne Böckler; Gamze Alpay; Birgit Stürmer
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

6.  Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting.

Authors:  D Fernandez-Duque; M I Posner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; M H Clark; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

Review 8.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Bruce D McCandliss; Tobias Sommer; Amir Raz; Michael I Posner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.