| Literature DB >> 29166649 |
Chunqiao Zhao1,2, Xifeng Fan1,2, Xincun Hou1,2, Yi Zhu1,2, Yuesen Yue1,2, Juying Wu1,2.
Abstract
Switchgrass is a photoperiod-sensitive energy grass suitable for growing in the marginal lands of China. We explored the effects of extended photoperiods of low-irradiance light (7 μmol·m-2·s-1, no effective photosynthesis) on the growth, the biomass dry weight, the biomass allocation, and, especially, the stem digestibility and cell wall characteristics of switchgrass. Two extended photoperiods (i.e., 18 and 24 h) were applied over Alamo. Extended light exposure (18 and 24 h) resulted in delayed heading and higher dry weights of vegetative organs (by 32.87 and 35.94%, respectively) at the expense of reducing the amount of sexual organs (by 40.05 and 50.87%, respectively). Compared to the control group (i.e., natural photoperiod), the yield of hexoses (% dry matter) in the stems after a direct enzymatic hydrolysis (DEH) treatment significantly increased (by 44.02 and 46.10%) for those groups irradiated during 18 and 24 h, respectively. Moreover, the yield of hexoses obtained via enzymatic hydrolysis increased after both basic (1% NaOH) and acid (1% H2SO4) pretreatments for the groups irradiated during 18 and 24 h. Additionally, low-irradiance light extension (LILE) significantly increased the content of non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) while notably reducing the lignin content and the syringyl to guaiacyl (S/G) ratio. These structural changes were in part responsible for the observed improved stem digestibility. Remarkably, LILE significantly decreased the cellulose crystallinity index (CrI) of switchgrass by significantly increasing both the arabinose substitution degree in xylan and the content of ammonium oxalate-extractable uronic acids, both favoring cellulose digestibility. Despite this LILE technology is not applied to the cultivation of switchgrass on a large scale yet, we believe that the present work is important in that it reveals important relationships between extended day length irradiations and biomass production and quality. Additionally, this study paves the way for improving biomass production and digestibility via genetic modification of day length sensitive transcription factors or key structural genes in switchgrass leaves.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29166649 PMCID: PMC5699803 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Growth characteristics of switchgrass.
| Treatments | T1 | Plant | Node | Tiller | Leaf | Stem diameter | Sheath length | Root | Leaf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 55±1.34c | 164±1.25b | 5.3±0.22b | 23.7±0.94B | 53.5±1.03a | 3.95±0.07b | 11.84±0.84B | 2828±27b | 2502±108B |
| 18 h | 75±2.68a | 177±2.37a | 7.0±0.40a | 32.0±1.30A | 54.8±1.74a | 4.01±0.1b | 14.92±0.33A | 3188±10a | 4014±187A |
| 24 h | 62±0.89b | 176±1.12a | 6.6±0.18a | 35.0±1.12A | 57.9±1.57a | 4.79±0.06a | 15.46±0.15A | 3014±15a | 3572±258A |
T1 indicates the time from plantation of switchgrass cultivars to the heading emergency. The switchgrass individuals were light controlled 16 days after plantation. All the data was presented as “means ± SE”, the different small letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05, and the different capital letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18, and 24 h switchgrass groups.
Biomass dry weight of different switchgrass organs.
| Treatments | Stem | Leaf | Sheath | Panicle | Seed | Rhizome | Root | Stem/Leaf | Root cap ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g plant-1 | |||||||||
| Control | 22.24±0.23B | 10.45±0.30B | 5.43±0.35B | 7.11±0.39A | 1.48±0.05A | 8.13±0.23a | 31.21±0.38a | 2.14±0.08a | 0.84±0.01a |
| 18 h | 26.51±0.70A | 15.6±0.44A | 8.54±0.15A | 4.38±0.17B | 0.77±0.04B | 7.73±0.16a | 32.65±0.75a | 1.7±0.05b | 0.72±0.01b |
| 24 h | 27.51±0.64A | 15.1±0.54A | 9.21±0.28A | 3.68±0.06C | 0.54±0.03C | 8.01±0.20a | 32.52±0.08a | 1.84±0.09b | 0.72±0.01b |
All the data was presented as “means ± SE”, the different small letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05, and the different capital letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18, and 24 h switchgrass groups.
Fig 1Biomass percentage of different organs in switchgrass with different photoperiods regulated.
C indicates the control switchgrass, while T1 and T2 indicate the switchgrass with extended photoperiods of 18 and 24 h, respectively. The different small letters or capital letters in each group of columns indicate the significant difference at level of P < 0.05 or 0.01, respectively. The bar indicates SE (n = 5).
Stem digestibility of switchgrass using 3 pretreatment methods.
| Digestibility procedure | Types | Sugar content/ % dry matter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 18 h | 24 h | |||
| Direct enzymatic hydrolysis | C5 | 3.65±0.12a | 3.84±0.18a | 3.39±0.13a | |
| C6 | 8.2±0.37B | 11.81±0.47A | 11.98±0.40A | ||
| Total | 11.85±0.49B | 15.65±0.53A | 15.37±0.40A | ||
| 1% H2SO4 | Pretreatment | C5 | 16.15±0.76a | 15.98±0.12a | 15.3±0.36a |
| C6 | 6.07±0.16b | 7.94±0.13a | 7.11±0.25a | ||
| Enzymatic hydrolysis | C5 | 3.08±0.13a | 3.23±0.13a | 3.14±0.09a | |
| C6 | 8.41±0.25B | 11.44±0.31A | 12.03±0.33A | ||
| Total | C5 | 19.23±0.89a | 19.21±0.25a | 18.44±0.45a | |
| C6 | 14.48±0.41B | 19.38±0.43A | 19.14±0.59A | ||
| 1%NaOH | Pretreatment | C5 | 3.17±0.09a | 2.91±0.21a | 2.98±0.17a |
| C6 | 3.03±0.13c | 3.97±0.12a | 3.64±0.11b | ||
| Enzymatic hydrolysis | C5 | 24.41±0.53C | 31.2±0.40A | 27.78±0.43B | |
| C6 | 20.66±1.13B | 26.95±0.39A | 27.59±0.38A | ||
| Total | C5 | 27.57±0.62c | 34.11±0.60a | 30.75±0.60b | |
| C6 | 23.69±1.25B | 30.93±0.51A | 31.23±0.49A | ||
All the data was presented as “means ± SE”, the different small letters followed each row of data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05, and the different capital letters followed each row of data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18, and 24 h switchgrass groups.
Content of the NSCs in different switchgrass organs.
| Treatments | Leaf | Stem | Root | Rhizome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble sugar | Starch | Soluble sugar | Starch | Soluble sugar | Starch | Soluble sugar | Starch | |
| Control | 1.55±0.10a | 2.35±0.15B | 2.06±0.06B | 3.69±0.20B | 2.25±0.09b | 8.63±0.30C | 2.64±0.25B | 9.11±0.40B |
| 18 h | 1.68±0.07a | 3.49±0.17A | 3.15±0.13A | 4.77±0.33A | 3.19±0.16a | 10.36±0.37B | 3.57±0.32A | 13.66±0.47A |
| 24 h | 1.59±0.11a | 3.94±0.18A | 3.29±0.13A | 4.96±0.37A | 3.55±0.18a | 13.67±0.41A | 3.67±0.14A | 14.56±0.69A |
The different small letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05, and the different capital letters followed each column data indicate the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18, and 24 h switchgrass groups, all the data were presented as “means ± SE”.
Fig 2Content of cell wall components in switchgrass stem.
The different small letters or capital letters in each group of columns indicate the significant difference at level of P < 0.05 or 0.01, respectively. The bar indicates SE (n = 5).
Fig 3Cellulose characteristics in the switchgrass stem.
(a) Cellulose crystallinity indexes, and (b) depolymerization degree of cellulose in the switchgrass stem. The different small letters in each group of columns indicate the significant difference at level of P < 0.05 or 0.01, respectively. The bar indicates SE (n = 5).
Fig 4Cellulose degradation efficiency of switchgrass stem.
The efficiency was calculated as the fraction of hexoses from the enzymatic hydrolysis procedure to the total cellulose in this study. The different small letters or capital letters in each group of columns indicate the significant difference at level of P < 0.05 or 0.01, respectively. The bar indicates SE (n = 5).
Monosaccharide composition of hemicellulose in switchgrass stem.
| Monosaccharides | Control | 18 h | 24 h |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rha | 0.22±0.01B | 0.32±0.01A | 0.3±0.01A |
| Ara | 10.12±0.41B | 14.17±0.54A | 14.96±0.76A |
| Xyl | 87.52±1.35a | 82.31±1.08b | 81.37±1.40b |
| Man | 0.22±0.01C | 0.34±0.01B | 0.43±0.01A |
| Glu | 1.36±0.03a | 1.43±0.02a | 1.43±0.02a |
| Gal | 1.22±0.04B | 1.43±0.05A | 1.51±0.06A |
| Xyl/Ara | 7.99±0.24A | 6.33±0.35B | 6.07±0.41B |
Rha: rhamnose, Ara: arabinose, Xyl: xylose, Man: mannose, Glu: glucose, Gal: galactose, all the data was presented by mean of “means ± SE”, the different small letters followed each row of data indicates the significant difference at P < 0.05, and the different capital letters followed each row of data indicates the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18 h and 24 h switchgrass groups.
Content of lignin monomers (% dry matter) in switchgrass stem.
| Treatments | Lignin monomers | S/G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| G | S | ||
| control | 262±7A | 203±4A | 0.78±0.02A |
| 18 h | 219±5B | 145±3B | 0.66±0.01B |
| 24 h | 217±4B | 141±2B | 0.65±0.02B |
G: coniferyl alcohol, S: sinapyl alcohol, the different capital letters followed each column data indicates the significant difference at P < 0.01 among the control, 18 h and 24 h switchgrass groups, all the data was presented by mean of “means ± SE”.