Literature DB >> 29165319

Comparison of forward- and back-projection in vivo EPID dosimetry for VMAT treatment of the prostate.

James L Bedford1, Ian M Hanson, Vibeke N Hansen.   

Abstract

In the forward-projection method of portal dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the integrated signal at the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is predicted at the time of treatment planning, against which the measured integrated image is compared. In the back-projection method, the measured signal at each gantry angle is back-projected through the patient CT scan to give a measure of total dose to the patient. This study aims to investigate the practical agreement between the two types of EPID dosimetry for prostate radiotherapy. The AutoBeam treatment planning system produced VMAT plans together with corresponding predicted portal images, and a total of 46 sets of gantry-resolved portal images were acquired in 13 patients using an iViewGT portal imager. For the forward-projection method, each acquisition of gantry-resolved images was combined into a single integrated image and compared with the predicted image. For the back-projection method, iViewDose was used to calculate the dose distribution in the patient for comparison with the planned dose. A gamma index for 3% and 3 mm was used for both methods. The results were investigated by delivering the same plans to a phantom and repeating some of the deliveries with deliberately introduced errors. The strongest agreement between forward- and back-projection methods is seen in the isocentric intensity/dose difference, with moderate agreement in the mean gamma. The strongest correlation is observed within a given patient, with less correlation between patients, the latter representing the accuracy of prediction of the two methods. The error study shows that each of the two methods has its own distinct sensitivity to errors, but that overall the response is similar. The forward- and back-projection EPID dosimetry methods show moderate agreement in this series of prostate VMAT patients, indicating that both methods can contribute to the verification of dose delivered to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29165319     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9c60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Comparing treatment uncertainty for ultra- vs. standard-hypofractionated breast radiation therapy based on in-vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  Yawo A C Fiagan; Evy Bossuyt; Melanie Machiels; Daan Nevens; Charlotte Billiet; Philip Poortmans; Thierry Gevaert; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  In vivo dosimetry for patients with prostate cancer to assess possible impact of bladder and rectum preparation.

Authors:  Yawo A C Fiagan; Evy Bossuyt; Daan Nevens; Piet Dirix; Frank Theys; Thierry Gevaert; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Art of publication: A beginner's guide to understanding the non-linear dynamics between research and publication.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar
Journal:  Cancer Res Stat Treat       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Electronic Portal Imaging Device-Based Three-Dimensional Volumetric Dosimetry for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Pretreatment Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Manikandan Arjunan; Sureka Chandra Sekaran; Biplab Sarkar; Saran Kumar Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Sam Beddar; Peter Greer; Nuria Jornet; Boyd McCurdy; Gabriel Paiva-Fonseca; Ben Mijnheer; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29

6.  Optimisation of a composite difference metric for prompt error detection in real-time portal dosimetry of simulated volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Ian M Hanson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A recurrent neural network for rapid detection of delivery errors during real-time portal dosimetry.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Ian M Hanson
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20

8.  Evaluation of  interfraction setup variations for  postmastectomy radiation therapy using EPID-based in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  Shengwei Kang; Jie Li; Jiabao Ma; Wei Zhang; Xiongfei Liao; Hou Qing; Tingqiang Tan; Xin Xin; Bin Tang; Angelo Piermattei; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.