Literature DB >> 10433900

Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.

.   

Abstract

Anchoring is a pervasive judgment bias in which decision makers are systematically influenced by random and uninformative starting points. While anchors have been shown to affect a broad range of judgments including answers to knowledge questions, monetary evaluations, and social judgments, the underlying causes of anchoring have been explored only recently. We suggest that anchors affect judgments by increasing the availability and construction of features that the anchor and target hold in common and reducing the availability of features of the target that differ from the anchor. We test this notion of anchoring as activation in five experiments that examine the effects of several experimental manipulations on judgments of value and belief as well as on measures of cognitive processes. Our results indicate that prompting subjects to consider features of the item that are different from the anchor reduces anchoring, while increasing consideration of similar features has no effect. The anchoring-as-activation approach provides a mechanism for debiasing anchoring and also points to a common mechanism underlying anchoring and a number of other judgment phenomena. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Year:  1999        PMID: 10433900     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  15 in total

1.  Seeds aren't anchors.

Authors:  N R Brown; R S Siegler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

2.  The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.

Authors:  Chunliang Yang; Bukuan Sun; David R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

3.  The Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort is Encoded by a Domain-General Valuation Network.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Bidhan Lamichhane; Todd Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Ulrich Frick
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment.

Authors:  Carey K Morewedge; Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The effect of anchors and social information on behaviour.

Authors:  Tanya O'Garra; Matthew R Sisco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Gist of Juries: Testing a Model of Damage Award Decision Making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Valerie P Hans; Jonathan C Corbin; Ryan Yeh; Kelvin Lin; Caisa Royer
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2015-06-22

8.  Anchors as Semantic Primes in Value Construction: An EEG Study of the Anchoring Effect.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Diandian Li; Qiang Shen; Wenwei Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Anchoring revisited: the role of the comparative question.

Authors:  Ina Grau; Gerd Bohner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anchoring in Numeric Judgments of Visual Stimuli.

Authors:  Linda Langeborg; Mårten Eriksson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.