| Literature DB >> 29163186 |
Carlos A Ibáñez1,2, Rafaela P Erthal3, Fernanda M Ogo3, Maria N C Peres2, Henrique R Vieira2, Camila Conejo2, Laize P Tófolo2, Flávio A Francisco2, Sandra da Silva Silveira2, Ananda Malta2, Audrei Pavanello2, Isabela P Martins2, Paulo H O da Silva2, Lucas Paulo Jacinto Saavedra2, Gessica D Gonçalves2, Veridiana M Moreira2, Vander S Alves2, Claudinéia C da Silva Franco2, Carina Previate2, Rodrigo M Gomes4, Renan de Oliveira Venci2, Francielle R S Dias2, James A Armitage5, Elena Zambrano1, Paulo C F Mathias2, Glaura S A Fernandes3, Kesia Palma-Rigo2.
Abstract
An interaction between obesity, impaired glucose metabolism and sperm function in adults has been observed but it is not known whether exposure to a diet high in fat during the peri-pubertal period can have longstanding programmed effects on reproductive function and gonadal structure. This study examined metabolic and reproductive function in obese rats programmed by exposure to a high fat (HF) diet during adolescence. The effect of physical training (Ex) in ameliorating this phenotype was also assessed. Thirty-day-old male Wistar rats were fed a HF diet (35% lard w/w) for 30 days then subsequently fed a normal fat diet (NF) for a 40-day recovery period. Control animals were fed a NF diet throughout life. At 70 days of life, animals started a low frequency moderate exercise training that lasted 30 days. Control animals remained sedentary (Se). At 100 days of life, biometric, metabolic and reproductive parameters were evaluated. Animals exposed to HF diet showed greater body weight, glucose intolerance, increased fat tissue deposition, reduced VO2max and reduced energy expenditure. Consumption of the HF diet led to an increase in the number of abnormal seminiferous tubule and a reduction in seminiferous epithelium height and seminiferous tubular diameter, which was reversed by moderate exercise. Compared with the NF-Se group, a high fat diet decreased the number of seminiferous tubules in stages VII-VIII and the NF-Ex group showed an increase in stages XI-XIII. HF-Se and NF-Ex animals showed a decreased number of spermatozoa in the cauda epididymis compared with animals from the NF-Se group. Animals exposed to both treatments (HF and Ex) were similar to all the other groups, thus these alterations induced by HF or Ex alone were partially prevented. Physical training reduced fat pad deposition and restored altered reproductive parameters. HF diet consumption during the peri-pubertal period induces long-term changes on metabolism and the reproductive system, but moderate and low frequency physical training is able to recover adipose tissue deposition and reproductive system alterations induced by high fat diet. This study highlights the importance of a balanced diet and continued physical activity during adolescence, with regard to metabolic and reproductive health.Entities:
Keywords: glucose metabolism; high fat diet; moderate exercise; obesity; reproductive system
Year: 2017 PMID: 29163186 PMCID: PMC5673641 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Experimental design. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animals; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals.
Figure 2Body Weight evaluated thought experimental period (n = 10 per group). Values expressed as mean ± SEM. +P < 0.05, for the probability based on analysis of variance. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animals; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals; D, effect of diet.
Biometric characteristics.
| Retroperytoneal fat | 1.13 ± 0.12ab | 1.55 ± 0.14ab | 0.80 ± 0.07a | 1.25 ± 0.12b | +++ | + | NS |
| Mesenteric fat | 0.64 ± 0.07a | 0.86 ± 0.05b | 0.57 ± 0.04a | 0.76 ± 0.02ab | +++ | NS | NS |
| Periepididymal fat | 1.07 ± 0.09a | 1.39 ± 0.08b | 1.12 ± 0.06ab | 1.33 ± 0.10ab | ++ | NS | NS |
| Gastrocnemious muscle | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | ++ | NS | NS |
| Soleous muscle | 0.046 ± 0.002 | 0.051 ± 0.003 | 0.048 ± 0.005 | 0.047 ± 0.003 | NS | NS | NS |
| Liver | 3.33 ± 0.13a | 3.53 ± 0.04ab | 3.35 ± 0.09a | 3.71 ± 0.04b | ++ | NS | NS |
| Right testis | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 0.36 ± 0.009b | 0.44 ± 0.01a | 0.38 ± 0.01ab | +++ | + | NS |
| Right epididymis | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate groups that differ statistically (p < 0.05) based on Tukey's multiple comparisons test. + P < 0.05, +++ P < 0.001 for the probability based on analysis of variance. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animals; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals; D, effect of diet; E, effect of exercise; I, interaction between diet and exercise, NS, no significant difference.
Sperm counts.
| Sperm number (× 106) | 134.8 ± 8.3 | 114.3 ± 16.4 | 148.7 ± 13.7 | 135.1 ± 12.0 |
| Sperm number per gram (× 106) | 119.7 ± 10.9 | 101.4 ± 7.5 | 115.2 ± 7.9 | 102.9 ± 8.7 |
| Daily sperm production (× 106) | 22.1 ± 1.3 | 18.7 ± 2.7 | 24.4 ± 2.2 | 22.1 ± 1.9 |
| Sperm number (× 106) | 78.4 ± 22.5 | 58.1 ± 10.5 | 73.4 ± 4.2 | 76.6 ± 7.3 |
| Sperm number per gram (× 106) | 305.3 ± 82.5 | 219.4 ± 41.7 | 284.4 ± 17.8 | 272.2 ± 32.2 |
| Transit time (days) | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.4 |
| Sperm number in (× 106) | 130.5 ± 2.6 | 78.3 ± 15.0 | 78.8 ± 14.3 | 85.1 ± 3.1 |
| Sperm number per gram (× 106) | 745.4 ± 20.6 | 389.8 ± 62.8 | 416.2 ± 95.7 | 458.2 ± 31.4 |
| Transit time (days) | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 3.4 ± 0.3 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Kruskal–Wallis, with post-hoc Dunn test.
Different letters indicate groups that differ statistically (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Sperm morphology in adult rats (n = 5 per group). Values expressed as percentage. ***p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis. with post-hoc Dunn test. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animals; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals.
Figure 4Histopathological analysis of seminiferous epithelium in testis in adult rats (n = 5 per group). Photomicrograph of testis sections from NF-Se (A), NF-Ex (B), HF-Ex (C), and HF-Se (D–F) groups. (A–C) Observe the normal aspect of the seminiferous epithelium. (D) Note the presence of multinucleated cells in the lumen (arrow) and disruption of seminiferous epithelium (asterisk). (E) Acidophilic cell (head of arrow). (F) Shows greater magnification of multinucleated cell (arrow) of image (D). (G) abnormal seminiferous tubules. (H) Seminiferous epithelium height. (I) Seminiferous tubular diameters. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animal; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, Exercised animals; L, lumen; Ep, epithelium; It, interstitial tissue; Lc, Leydig cells; Sc, Sertoli cells. Hematoxylin and eosin stain. Magnification x100 (A–D), x400 (E,F). Values expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test, with the post-hoc Dunn test. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animals; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals;
Spermatogenesis kinetics.
| Stages I-VI | 31.8 ± 1.02 | 35.6 ± 1.91 | 32.0 ± 1.48 | 37.0 ± 1.38 |
| Stages VII-VIII | 35.2 ± 1.07 | 26.6 ± 0.98 | 30.0 ± 2.02 | 28.3 ± 1.57 |
| Stages IX-XIII | 28.4 ± 1.29 | 32.2 ± 0.97 | 34.2 ± 0.97 | 28.9 ± 0.61 |
| Stage XIV | 4.6 ± 0.92 | 5.6 ± 1.21 | 3.8 ± 0.49 | 5.7 ± 0.58 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Kruskal–Wallis, with post-hoc Dunn test.
Different letters indicate groups that differ statistically (p < 0.05).
Stereological analysis of caput and cauda epididymis.
| Stroma | 24.1 [21.4–28.0] | 23.2 [21.1–28.4] | 27.4 [23.9–32.4] | 28.0 [19.8–31.2] |
| Lumen | 47.0 [43.4–50.0] | 48.2 [41.7–51.2] | 45.2 [40.8–50.0] | 49.4 [35.9–54.2] |
| Epithelium | 28.9 [25.1–32.4] | 28.0 [24.5–30.6] | 25.6 [23.8–29.6] | 25.6 [20.1–34.8] |
| Stroma | 22.9 [18.7–28.0] | 22.6 [19.3–26.8] | 25.9 [21.4–30.3] | 22.0 [18.6–26.8] |
| Lumen | 52.4 [44.5–58.9] | 50.6 [44.2–54.0] | 46.7 [43.4–52.5] | 54.2 [49.4–64.0] |
| Epithelium | 25.6 [23.1–29.3] | 27.7 [23.9–30.3] | 26.8 [22.2–30.9] | 21.1 [12.0–26.3] |
Values expressed as median [Q1–Q3] from percentage. Kruskal–Wallis. with post-hoc Dunn test.
Different letters indicate groups that differ statistically (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Glycaemia (A) and area under the curve (AUC) (B) during ivGtt. (C) VO2max, and (D) Energy expenditure in 98 day-old rats (n = 10 per group) Values expressed as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, of the differences between HF and NF rats for the probability based on Tukey's multiple comparisons test. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, +++P < 0.001 for the probability based on analysis of variance. NF, normal fat diet animals; HF, high fat diet animal; Se, sedentary animals; Ex, exercised animals; D, effect of diet; E, effect of exercise; I, interaction between diet and exercise; ns: no significant difference.