| Literature DB >> 29162137 |
Pedro Pedrosa1, Amelie Heuer-Jungemann2, Antonios G Kanaras2, Alexandra R Fernandes1, Pedro V Baptista3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic therapy has great potential for cancer therapy with several FDA approved formulations but there are considerable side effects upon the normal blood vessels that decrease the potential application of such therapeutics. Chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) has been used as a model to study angiogenesis in vivo. Using a CAM model, it had been previously shown that spherical gold nanoparticles functionalised with an anti-angiogenic peptide can humper neo-angiogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; CAM assay; Gold nanoparticles; Green laser; Phototherapy; VEGFR pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29162137 PMCID: PMC5697398 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-017-0321-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1a Characterization of functionalized AuNPs by UV–Vis spectroscopy. A slight red shift in the UV–Vis spectrum of AuNPs@antiP/scramble infers the successful functionalisation with these peptides. b Transmission electron microscopy of citrate AuNPs. Scale bar is 50 nm
Fig. 2a Green Laser Irradiation of blood (87 μL) mixed with AuNPs@OEG (16.4 nM) or water (Vf-100 µL) at varying potencies for 1 min at of AuNPs@OEG. Cauterization of the blood samples can be seen as black spots. b Infrared image of the blood well with nanoparticles irradiated with 0.61 W cm2. The sample achieved a final temperature of 92 °C
Fig. 3CAM images 24 h after application of the nanoformulation and irradiation. a Images before software analysis. b Images after software analysis. The nanoparticle formulations were at 16.4 nM concentration and the irradiated conditions were exposed to 0.49 W cm−2 for 60 s
Fig. 4Percentage of newly formed vessels over 24 h in CAM model compared with respective control. AuNPs@scramble (16.4 nM) were compared with PBS and AuNPs@antiP (16.4 nM) were compared with AuNPs@scramble. Irradiated formulations (Laser) were exposed to 0.49 W cm−2 for 60 s. Differences between groups were considered significant at P < 0.05 (*)
Fig. 5Gene expression heatmap for data retrieved from qPCR. Gene expression measured for scramble peptide irradiated (S IR); antiP and antiP irradiated (antiP and antiP IR, respectively); and the respective nanoconjugates. The nanoparticle formulations were at 16.4 nM concentration and the irradiated conditions were exposed to 0.49 W cm−2 for 60 s