Literature DB >> 29159910

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma need a personalized management: A lesson from clinical practice.

Edoardo Giovanni Giannini1, Laura Bucci2, Francesca Garuti2, Matteo Brunacci1, Barbara Lenzi2, Matteo Valente2, Eugenio Caturelli3, Giuseppe Cabibbo4, Fabio Piscaglia5, Roberto Virdone6, Martina Felder7, Francesca Ciccarese8, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi9, Rodolfo Sacco10, Gianluca Svegliati Baroni11, Fabio Farinati12, Gian Lodovico Rapaccini13, Andrea Olivani14, Antonio Gasbarrini15, Maria Di Marco16, Filomena Morisco17, Marco Zoli18, Alberto Masotto19, Franco Borzio20, Luisa Benvegnù21, Fabio Marra22, Antonio Colecchia23, Gerardo Nardone24, Mauro Bernardi2, Franco Trevisani2.   

Abstract

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) advanced stage (BCLC C) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes a heterogeneous population, where sorafenib alone is the recommended treatment. In this study, our aim was to assess treatment and overall survival (OS) of BCLC C patients subclassified according to clinical features (performance status [PS], macrovascular invasion [MVI], extrahepatic spread [EHS] or MVI + EHS) determining their allocation to this stage. From the Italian Liver Cancer database, we analyzed 835 consecutive BCLC C patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2014. Patients were subclassified as: PS1 alone (n = 385; 46.1%), PS2 alone (n = 146; 17.5%), MVI (n = 224; 26.8%), EHS (n = 51; 6.1%), and MVI + EHS (n = 29; 3.5%). MVI, EHS, and MVI + EHS patients had larger and multifocal/massive HCCs and higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels than PS1 and PS2 patients. Median OS significantly declined from PS1 (38.6 months) to PS2 (22.3 months), EHS (11.2 months), MVI (8.2 months), and MVI + EHS (3.1 months; P < 0.001). Among MVI patients, OS was longer in those with peripheral than with central (portal trunk) MVI (11.2 vs. 7.1 months; P = 0.005). The most frequent treatments were: curative approaches in PS1 (39.7%), supportive therapy in PS2 (41.8%), sorafenib in MVI (39.3%) and EHS (37.3%), and best supportive care in MVI + EHS patients (51.7%). Independent prognostic factors were: Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh class, ascites, platelet count, albumin, tumor size, MVI, EHS, AFP levels, and treatment type.
CONCLUSION: BCLC C stage does not identify patients homogeneous enough to be allocated to a single stage. PS1 alone is not sufficient to include a patient into this stage. The remaining patients should be subclassified according to PS and tumor features, and new patient-tailored therapeutic indications are needed. (Hepatology 2018;67:1784-1796).
© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29159910     DOI: 10.1002/hep.29668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  33 in total

Review 1.  2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Subrat K Acharya; Shivaram P Singh; Anil Arora; Radha K Dhiman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Anil C Anand; Prashant Bhangui; Yogesh K Chawla; Siddhartha Datta Gupta; Vinod K Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Naveen Kalra; Premashish Kar; Suyash S Kulkarni; Rakesh Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Ram Madhavan; V G Mohan Prasad; Amar Mukund; Aabha Nagral; Dipanjan Panda; Shashi B Paul; Padaki N Rao; Mohamed Rela; Manoj K Sahu; Vivek A Saraswat; Samir R Shah; Praveen Sharma; Sunil Taneja; Manav Wadhawan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-23

2.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma Intermediate Stage Subclassification Systems: One, None, and One Hundred Thousand.

Authors:  Edoardo G Giannini; Giorgia Bodini; Manuele Furnari; Elisa Marabotto
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  TACE with degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE) as second-line treatment in HCC patients dismissing or ineligible for sorafenib.

Authors:  Roberto Iezzi; Maurizio Pompili; Emanuele Rinninella; Eleonora Annicchiarico; Matteo Garcovich; Lucia Cerrito; Francesca Ponziani; AnnaMaria De Gaetano; Massimo Siciliano; Michele Basso; Maria Assunta Zocco; GianLodovico Rapaccini; Alessandro Posa; Francesca Carchesio; Marco Biolato; Felice Giuliante; Antonio Gasbarrini; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Clinical Utility of Albumin Bilirubin Grade as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gauri Mishra; Ammar Majeed; Anouk Dev; Guy D Eslick; David J Pinato; Hirofumi Izumoto; Atsushi Hiraoka; Teh-Ia Huo; Po-Hong Liu; Philip J Johnson; Stuart K Roberts
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  The characteristics of patients with macrovascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: when East meets West.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Yen; Wei-Feng Li; Chih-Chi Wang; Kwong-Ming Kee; Yu-Fan Cheng; Jing-Houng Wang; Sheng-Nan Lu; Chao-Hung Hung
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura Kulik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages B and C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Time for a Subclassification.

Authors:  Rita Golfieri; Irene Bargellini; Carlo Spreafico; Franco Trevisani
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 11.740

8.  Time-Varying mHAP-III Is the Most Accurate Predictor of Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization.

Authors:  Claudia Campani; Alessandro Vitale; Gabriele Dragoni; Umberto Arena; Giacomo Laffi; Umberto Cillo; Edoardo G Giannini; Francesco Tovoli; Gian Ludovico Rapaccini; Maria Di Marco; Eugenio Caturelli; Marco Zoli; Rodolfo Sacco; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Andrea Mega; Maria Guarino; Antonio Gasbarrini; Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Elisabetta Biasini; Alberto Masotto; Gerardo Nardone; Giovanni Raimondo; Francesco Azzaroli; Gianpaolo Vidili; Maurizia Rossana Brunetto; Fabio Farinati; Franco Trevisani; Fabio Marra
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  Impact of Extrahepatic Metastases on Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Liver Dominant Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subanalysis of the SORAMIC Trial.

Authors:  Kerstin Schütte; Regina Schinner; Mathias P Fabritius; Melina Möller; Christiane Kuhl; Roberto Iezzi; Osman Öcal; Maciej Pech; Bora Peynircioglu; Max Seidensticker; Rohini Sharma; Daniel Palmer; Jean-Pierre Bronowicki; Peter Reimer; Peter Malfertheiner; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 11.740

10.  A Nomogram-Based Prognostic Model for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Giovanni Marasco; Francesco Poggioli; Antonio Colecchia; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Filippo Pelizzaro; Edoardo Giovanni Giannini; Sara Marinelli; Gian Ludovico Rapaccini; Eugenio Caturelli; Mariella Di Marco; Elisabetta Biasini; Fabio Marra; Filomena Morisco; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Marco Zoli; Antonio Gasbarrini; Gianluca Svegliati Baroni; Alberto Masotto; Rodolfo Sacco; Giovanni Raimondo; Francesco Azzaroli; Andrea Mega; Gianpaolo Vidili; Maurizia Rossana Brunetto; Gerardo Nardone; Luigina Vanessa Alemanni; Elton Dajti; Federico Ravaioli; Davide Festi; Franco Trevisani; On Behalf Of The Italian Liver Cancer Ita Li Ca Group
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.