Kilian Rueckl1, Friedrich Boettner2, Noor Maza2,3, Armin Runer2, Ulrich Bechler2, Peter Sculco2. 1. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. kilian.rueckl@gmail.com. 2. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 3. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether the posterior-anterior (PA)-flexed view improves the radiographic assessment of patients with knee pain compared with the standard standing anterior-posterior radiograph. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-five patients with knee pain underwent anterior-posterior (AP), PA flexed, lateral, and Merchant radiographs of the knee. Knees were grouped as mild (Kellgren and Lawrence [K-L] 1-2) or severe (K-L 3-4) osteoarthritis (OA) and either varus (medial compartment), valgus (lateral compartment), or patellofemoral OA. RESULTS: In knees with mild valgus OA on AP view (K-L 1-2), the PA flexed view was more sensitive than the AP view. The measured lateral minimal joint space width (minJSW) decreased more than 2 mm in 68% of the patients, resulting in an increase in K-L grade (3 or 4). In patients with severe valgus OA and in all patients with varus and patellofemoral OA, there was no difference between AP and PA flexed view with regard to radiographic measurements or KL grade. Based on the Medicare reimbursement rate using the PA flexed view alone instead of both views reduced imaging costs by 47%. CONCLUSION: The PA flexed view better classifies the severity of lateral compartment disease in patients with mild valgus OA and provides comparable diagnostic sensitivity for joint space narrowing in varus- and patellofemoral OA. Using the PA flexed view alone was more cost effective than using the combination of AP and PA flexed imaging.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether the posterior-anterior (PA)-flexed view improves the radiographic assessment of patients with knee pain compared with the standard standing anterior-posterior radiograph. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-five patients with knee pain underwent anterior-posterior (AP), PA flexed, lateral, and Merchant radiographs of the knee. Knees were grouped as mild (Kellgren and Lawrence [K-L] 1-2) or severe (K-L 3-4) osteoarthritis (OA) and either varus (medial compartment), valgus (lateral compartment), or patellofemoral OA. RESULTS: In knees with mild valgus OA on AP view (K-L 1-2), the PA flexed view was more sensitive than the AP view. The measured lateral minimal joint space width (minJSW) decreased more than 2 mm in 68% of the patients, resulting in an increase in K-L grade (3 or 4). In patients with severe valgus OA and in all patients with varus and patellofemoral OA, there was no difference between AP and PA flexed view with regard to radiographic measurements or KL grade. Based on the Medicare reimbursement rate using the PA flexed view alone instead of both views reduced imaging costs by 47%. CONCLUSION: The PA flexed view better classifies the severity of lateral compartment disease in patients with mild valgus OA and provides comparable diagnostic sensitivity for joint space narrowing in varus- and patellofemoral OA. Using the PA flexed view alone was more cost effective than using the combination of AP and PA flexed imaging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assessment; Cost; Osteoarthritis; PA flexed view; Valgus
Authors: Manish Kothari; Ali Guermazi; Gabriele von Ingersleben; Yves Miaux; Martine Sieffert; Jon E Block; Randall Stevens; Charles G Peterfy Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Donna Blankenbaker; Paul Stanton; Jason Fine; Arthur De Smet Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S Botha-Scheepers; M Kloppenburg; H M Kroon; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; F C Breedveld; P Ravaud; M Dougados Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2006-10-30 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Donna G Blankenbaker; Paul T Stanton; Jason P Fine; Arthur A De Smet Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-04-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: E Vignon; K D Brandt; C Mercier; M Hochberg; D Hunter; S Mazzuca; K Powell; B Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Neil A Segal; Eric Frick; Jeffrey Duryea; Michael C Nevitt; Jingbo Niu; James C Torner; David T Felson; Donald D Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: James W Connelly; Vincent P Galea; Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Christian Skovgaard Nielsen; Charles R Bragdon; Andreas Kappel; James I Huddleston; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 4.755