Literature DB >> 29159676

The posterior-anterior flexed view is better than the anterior-posterior view for assessing osteoarthritis of the knee.

Kilian Rueckl1, Friedrich Boettner2, Noor Maza2,3, Armin Runer2, Ulrich Bechler2, Peter Sculco2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether the posterior-anterior (PA)-flexed view improves the radiographic assessment of patients with knee pain compared with the standard standing anterior-posterior radiograph.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-five patients with knee pain underwent anterior-posterior (AP), PA flexed, lateral, and Merchant radiographs of the knee. Knees were grouped as mild (Kellgren and Lawrence [K-L] 1-2) or severe (K-L 3-4) osteoarthritis (OA) and either varus (medial compartment), valgus (lateral compartment), or patellofemoral OA.
RESULTS: In knees with mild valgus OA on AP view (K-L 1-2), the PA flexed view was more sensitive than the AP view. The measured lateral minimal joint space width (minJSW) decreased more than 2 mm in 68% of the patients, resulting in an increase in K-L grade (3 or 4). In patients with severe valgus OA and in all patients with varus and patellofemoral OA, there was no difference between AP and PA flexed view with regard to radiographic measurements or KL grade. Based on the Medicare reimbursement rate using the PA flexed view alone instead of both views reduced imaging costs by 47%.
CONCLUSION: The PA flexed view better classifies the severity of lateral compartment disease in patients with mild valgus OA and provides comparable diagnostic sensitivity for joint space narrowing in varus- and patellofemoral OA. Using the PA flexed view alone was more cost effective than using the combination of AP and PA flexed imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Cost; Osteoarthritis; PA flexed view; Valgus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29159676     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2815-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  24 in total

1.  Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; F Wolfe; R J Ward; N Flowers; C Hayne
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish Kothari; Ali Guermazi; Gabriele von Ingersleben; Yves Miaux; Martine Sieffert; Jon E Block; Randall Stevens; Charles G Peterfy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Arthroscopic validation of radiographic grading scales of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Donna Blankenbaker; Paul Stanton; Jason Fine; Arthur De Smet
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Fixed-flexion knee radiography: the sensitivity to detect knee joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S Botha-Scheepers; M Kloppenburg; H M Kroon; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; F C Breedveld; P Ravaud; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Radiographic grading and measurement of joint space width in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Steve Mazzuca; Jeff Duryea; Alan Brett
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Radiographic findings of osteoarthritis versus arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration in the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Donna G Blankenbaker; Paul T Stanton; Jason P Fine; Arthur A De Smet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Alignment of the medial tibial plateau affects the rate of joint space narrowing in the osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  E Vignon; K D Brandt; C Mercier; M Hochberg; D Hunter; S Mazzuca; K Powell; B Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; C S Ranawat; J M Esdaile; N A Johanson; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Comparison of tibiofemoral joint space width measurements from standing CT and fixed flexion radiography.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; Eric Frick; Jeffrey Duryea; Michael C Nevitt; Jingbo Niu; James C Torner; David T Felson; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  2 in total

1.  Which Preoperative Factors are Associated with Not Attaining Acceptable Levels of Pain and Function After TKA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  James W Connelly; Vincent P Galea; Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Christian Skovgaard Nielsen; Charles R Bragdon; Andreas Kappel; James I Huddleston; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  The posterior-anterior-flexed view is essential for the evaluation of valgus osteoarthritis. A prospective study on 134 valgus knees.

Authors:  Kilian Rueckl; Armin Runer; Ulrich Bechler; Martin Faschingbauer; Sebastian Philipp Boelch; Peter Keyes Sculco; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.