| Literature DB >> 29158883 |
Sara Ramezani1,2, Mahmoudreza Hadjighassem2,3, Nasim Vousooghi2,4, Mansour Parvaresh5, Farshid Arbabi6, Naser Amini7, Mohammad Taghi Joghataei2,7,8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The mechanism of putative cytotoxicity of 4-[3-(cyclopentyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-pyrrolidone (rolipram), a specific phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is almost unknown. This study aimed to investigate the role of protein kinase B (Akt) pathway in the cytotoxic effect of rolipram on human GBM U87 MG cell line and Tumor-Initiating Cells (TICs) isolated from patient's GBM specimen.Entities:
Keywords: Akt signal; Glioblastoma multiforme; Rolipram; SC79; Tumor-initiating cells; U87 MG cell line
Year: 2017 PMID: 29158883 PMCID: PMC5683690 DOI: 10.18869/nirp.bcn.8.4.325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Clin Neurosci ISSN: 2008-126X
Figure 1Characterization of TICs isolated from GBM tissue. (A) Flow cytometry results of GBM-derived neurospheres in primary culture. TICs were positive for CD133 and CD15 but did not considerably express CD34 and CD45. (B) The relative expression of VEGFA mRNA measured by qPCR and immunoreactive bands and relative expression of PDE4A detected by western blot in the periphery-derived cells and core-derived TICs. U87 MG cells express PDE4A protein. Beta-actin was considered as housekeeping. Bars represent fold differences of mean normalized expression values±SEM (n=3). ***P<0.001 compared to periphery zone.
Figure 2The MTT assay results and effects of indicated concentrations of rolipram on the cell viability are presented. (A) By using prism graph pad 6, the curves of log IC50 of rolipram in the U87 MG cells and TICs are illustrated. (B) The results of 1-way ANOVA analysis to compare fold differences of mean normalized % viability values among various concentrations of rolipram together and relative to control (DMSO) in U87 MG cells and TICs. Bars represent fold differences of mean normalized % viability values±SEM (n=4). ***P<0.001 compared to corresponding control, ×××P<0.001, ××P<0.01 compared to concentration 30 μM of rolipram, ###P<0.001 compared to concentration 100 μM of rolipram.
Figure 3The relative expression of phosphorylated AKT (Ser473) in U87 MG cells and TICs treated with indicated consentrations of SC79 for 5 min. Bars represent fold differences of mean normalized expression values±SEM (n=4). *P<0.05 compared to untreated control (concentration 0).
Figure 4Apoptosis (A) and viability (B) rates in U87 MG cells and TICs treated with rolipram at IC50 in the absence or presence of SC79 (4μg/mL) and DMSO as control for 48 h. (A) TUNEL (green) and PI (red) positive cells were visualized at wave length of 540 and 580 nm, respectively. Bars represent mean % apoptosis values±SEM (n=4). ***P<0.001 compared to control. (B) Bares represent fold differences of mean normalized % viability values±SEM (n=4). One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test were used.*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to control.
Figure 5The intracellular level of cAMP determined by ELISA (A) and relative expression of cleaved-caspase3 and BCL-2 in TICs (B), phosphorylated AKT (Ser473) (C), MMP2 and VEGFA (D) detected by western blots in U87 MG cells and TICs treated with rolipram at IC50 in absence or presence of SC79 (4μg/mL) and DMSO as control for 48 h. Bars represent mean normalized values±SEM (n=4). One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test were used *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to control.