Literature DB >> 29158769

Physicians' duty to recontact and update genetic advice.

Yvonne A Stevens1, Grant D Senner2, Gary E Marchant1.   

Abstract

This perspective addresses whether physicians have a duty to recontact former or current patients to update clinical advice based on newly discovered genomic information. Genetic information is unique compared with other medical data in that the underlying data do not appreciably change during the patients' lifetime, but the clinical significance of that information will continue to evolve. Based on relevant case law and guidelines, there is no general, established legal duty for physicians to affirmatively recontact former or current patients to update clinical advice based on newly discovered genetic information. However, integration of genomics into clinical practice is advancing quickly, and there may be limited, specific situations where a physician may have a duty to provide updated genetic information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  duty to recontact; genetic sequencing; genomic medicine; liability; medical malpractice; physicians; physician–patient relationship

Year:  2017        PMID: 29158769      PMCID: PMC5693364          DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  16 in total

1.  The duty to recontact: benefit and harm.

Authors:  N F Sharpe
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The coming explosion in genetic testing--is there a duty to recontact?

Authors:  Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications.

Authors:  Graeme Laurie
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Expanding the physician's duty of care: a duty to recontact?

Authors:  Martin Letendre; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2004

6.  Contrasting Medical and Legal Standards of Evidence: A Precision Medicine Case Study.

Authors:  Gary E Marchant; Kathryn Scheckel; Doug Campos-Outcalt
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniele Carrieri; Anneke M Lucassen; Angus J Clarke; Sandi Dheensa; Shane Doheny; Peter D Turnpenny; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Public variant databases: liability?

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Robert Cook-Deegan; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Kyle B Brothers; Sara Fitzgerald-Butt; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Leila Jamal; Cynthia A James; Gail P Jarvik; Jennifer B McCormick; Tanya N Nelson; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Julie Richer; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Jason L Vassy; Jennifer K Wagner; Howard P Levy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Genetics: The Role of Genetics in Predicting Risk.

Authors:  Jessica Chowns; Lily Hoffman-Andrews; Amy Marzolf; Nosheen Reza; Anjali Tiku Owens
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.456

3.  Genetic database software as medical devices.

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Seydina B Touré; Johan Ordish; Alison Hall; Bartha Knoppers
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  From Genetics to Genomics: Facing the Liability Implications in Clinical Care.

Authors:  Gary Marchant; Mark Barnes; James P Evans; Bonnie LeRoy; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Genomic medicine and the "loss of chance" medical malpractice doctrine.

Authors:  Jennifer K Wagner; Michelle N Meyer
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-04-05

6.  Can Clinical Genetics Laboratories be Sued for Medical Malpractice?

Authors:  Alexandra L Foulkes; Jessica L Roberts; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung; Ellen Wright Clayton; Barbara Evans; Gary E Marchant
Journal:  Ann Health Law Life Sci       Date:  2020

7.  Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting.

Authors:  Megan C Best; Phyllis Butow; Jacqueline Savard; Chris Jacobs; Nicole Bartley; Grace Davies; Christine E Napier; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Barbara Biesecker; Katherine M Tucker; Ilona Juraskova; Bettina Meiser; Timothy Schlub; Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.351

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.