Malose Jack Mphahlele1, Hugues K Paumo2, Yee Siew Choong3. 1. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Private Bag X06, Florida 1710, South Africa. mphahmj@unisa.ac.za. 2. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Private Bag X06, Florida 1710, South Africa. Tkamdeh@unisa.ac.za. 3. Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia. yeesiew@usm.my.
Abstract
Series of the 2-unsubstituted and 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-substituted 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines and their 6-(4-fluorophenyl)-substituted derivatives were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and HeLa cells. The 2-unsubstituted 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines lacked activity, whereas most of their 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives were found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity and selectivity against HeLa cells. Replacement of bromine with 4-fluorophenyl group for the 2-unsubstituted 4-anilinoquinazolines resulted in superior activity against HeLa cells compared to Gefitinib. The presence of a 4-fluorophenyl group in the 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives led to increased cytotoxicity against HeLa cells, except for the 3-chloroanilino derivative. The most active compounds, namely, 3g, 3l, and 4l, were found to exhibit a moderate to significant inhibitory effect against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK). The EGFR molecular docking model suggested that these compounds are nicely bound to the region of EGFR.
Series of the 2-unsubstituted and 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-substituted 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines and their 6-(4-fluorophenyl)-substituted derivatives were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and HeLa cells. The 2-unsubstituted4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines lacked activity, whereas most of their 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives were found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity and selectivity against HeLa cells. Replacement of bromine with 4-fluorophenyl group for the 2-unsubstituted4-anilinoquinazolines resulted in superior activity against HeLa cells compared to Gefitinib. The presence of a 4-fluorophenyl group in the 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives led to increased cytotoxicity against HeLa cells, except for the 3-chloroanilino derivative. The most active compounds, namely, 3g, 3l, and 4l, were found to exhibit a moderate to significant inhibitory effect against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK). The EGFR molecular docking model suggested that these compounds are nicely bound to the region of EGFR.
The quinazoline scaffold continues to draw the attention of medicinal chemists due to its well-known anticancer properties; many substituted quinazoline derivatives have recently earned great interest in targeted therapies as antitumor drugs. Among quinazoline-based compounds, the 4-anilinoquinazolines assert themselves as selective inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) phosphorylation, which results from competitive binding at the ATP site [1,2]. The altered protein expression and activity of the receptor tyrosine kinases (TK) are implicated in the progression of various types of cancers such as breast, ovarian, colon, and prostate [3]. Gefitinib (A), shown in Figure 1, is an example of a trisubstituted 4-anilinoquinazoline drug used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive mutations of the EGFR [4]. Likewise, Vandetanib (B) has been found to be a selective inhibitor that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the EGFR signal transduction pathways for the treatment of breast cancer [5]. Lapatinib (C), a 6-heteroaryl substituted 4-anilinoquinazoline derivative, on the other hand, is an oral dual TK inhibitor that targets both EGFR and HER2 to inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer cells [6]. The 6-vinyl substituted 4-anilinoquinazoline derivative (D) is a selective ERBB2 angiogenesis inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of various types of cancer [7]. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) modelling studies for the ability of 4-anilinoquinazoline to inhibit EGFR-TK activity revealed that both of the quinazolinenitrogen atoms are essential for activity (as a hydrogen bond acceptor for N1 and a water-linked hydrogen bond acceptor for N3); aniline moiety-bearing lipophilic substituents such as chloro, bromo, and trifluoromethyl groups were also important as they occupy the lipophilic pocket [8]. Although most of the medicinally important 4-anilinoquinazolines have no substitute at the C-2 position, in a previous study on the polysubstituted 2-aryl-4-(3-fluoroanilino)quinazolines from our laboratory, we observed that the presence of bromine in the 6-position and a 4-chlorophenyl group at position-2 of the quinazoline moiety favour activity against the humanbreast cancer (MCF-7) cell line [9]. In our quest to optimise this class of potential anti-proliferative agents, we decided to prepare the C-2 unsubstituted and the 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines substituted with different halogen atoms on the aniline moiety and a 4-fluorophenyl group at the 6-position for further studies of anticancer properties.
Our approach to the target compounds involved the use of 6-bromo-4-chloroquinazoline and 2-aryl-6-bromo-4-chloroquinazolines as substrates for amination with halogenated aniline derivatives. The main aim was to evaluate the resultant 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines and their 6-(4-fluorophenyl) substituted derivatives for anti-proliferative effect and for their ability to inhibit EGFR tyrosine kinase phosphorylation. Their mechanism of anticancer activity is also explained theoretically through molecular (in silico) docking into the ATP binding site of EGFR to predict the hypothetical protein–ligand binding mode.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis of 6-(4-Fluorophenyl) Substituted 4-Anilinoquinazolines
It has previously been demonstrated that the presence of halogen atom(s) on the aniline ring improves the biological activity of the 4-anilinoquinazoline derivatives [4,5,8,10]. The presence of a fluorine-containing group in a molecule, on the other hand, introduces beneficial biological and pharmacological properties such as increased metabolic stability and binding ability as well as enhanced membrane permeability [11,12]. With these considerations in mind, we decided to prepare 2-unsubstituted and 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted 4-(halogenophenylamino)-6-bromoquinazolines and transformed them into the corresponding 6-(4-fluorophenyl)–substituted derivatives (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2). With the exception of the 4-(4-bromoanilino) substituted derivatives, 4e and 4k, all other 6-(4-fluorophenyl)–substituted 4-anilinoquinazolines 4 were readily prepared via initial amination of 6-bromo-4-chloroquinazoline 2a (R = H) or 6-bromo-4-chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)quinazoline 2b (R = 4-ClC6H4–) with various halogenated aniline derivatives in tetrahydrofuran-isopropanol (THF-iPrOH) mixture in the presence of HCl as a catalyst under reflux for 5 h (Scheme 1 and Table 1). The 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazoline derivatives 3a–l are easily distinguished from the corresponding substrates by the presence of additional signals in the aromatic region of their proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra (1H- and 13C-NMR) and the NH signal in the region δH 9.89–10.10 ppm. The presence of the aniline group is further confirmed by a band in the regions νmax 3239–3280 (3a–f) and 3413–3456 cm−1 (3g–l) of their IR spectra. Moreover, the molecular ion region of their mass spectra revealed the absence of the M+ and M+2 peaks in the ratio 3:1 due to the 35Cl and 37Cl isotope observed in the spectra of the corresponding substrates, thus confirming their aniline nature. We subjected the 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazoline derivatives 3a–l to Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling with 4-fluorophenylboronic acid as a model for Csp2–Csp2 bond formation in the presence of a dichlorobis(tricyclohexylphosphine)palladium(II) pre-catalyst and K2CO3 as a base in THF-iPrOH at 70 °C. We isolated by column chromatography on silica gel the corresponding 6-arylated 4-anilinoquinazolines 4. Due to competitive Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of the Csp2–Br bond of the 4-bromoanilino–substituted derivatives 3e and 3k, we opted for an alternative route for the synthesis of the corresponding 6-(4-fluorophenyl) substituted derivatives 4e and 4k, which is outlined in Scheme 2 and Table 2 below. The NH-4(3H)-oxo derivatives 1a and 1b were first subjected to Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling with 4-fluorophenylboronic acid, followed by aromatization of 5a and 5b under the same reaction conditions employed for the preparation of compounds 2. Amination of the corresponding products 6a and 6b with 4-bromoaniline to afford 4e and 4k was achieved under the same reaction conditions employed for the synthesis of compounds 3. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of compounds 4a–l are characterised by the presence of an increased number of proton and carbon signals in the aromatic region, thus confirming the substitution of the bromine atom. The aromatic region of their 1H-NMR spectra reveal the presence of two sets of intense triplets typical of the 4-fluorophenyl group. The molecular ion region of the mass spectra of compounds 4a–l, on the other hand, revealed the absence of M+ and M+2 peaks in the ratio 1:1 characteristic of compounds containing the 79Br and 81Br isotopes, thus confirming their 6-carbosubstituted 4-anilinoquinazoline nature.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines and their 6-fluorophenyl derivatives. Reagents & conditions: (i) POCl3, Et3N, reflux, 2 h; (ii) NH2Ar, HCl, THF-iPrOH, 70 °C, 3 h; (iii) 4-FC6H4B(OH)2, PdCl2(PPh3)2, Cs2CO3, THF-iPrOH, 70 °C, 3 h.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 4-(4-bromoanilino)-6-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline derivatives 4e and 4k. Reagents & conditions: (i) 4-FC6H4B(OH)2, PdCl2(PPh3)2, K2CO3, dioxane (aq), reflux, 3 h; (ii) POCl3, Et3N, reflux, 5 h; (iii) 4-NH2C6H4Br, HCl, THF-iPrOH, 70 °C, 3 h.
Table 1
Percentage yields of 3a–l, 4a–d & 4f and 4g–j & 4l.
Substrate
R
Ar
%Yield of 3
%Yield of 4
2a
H
2-FC6H4-
80 (3a)
64 (4a)
2a
H
3-FC6H4-
76 (3b)
72 (4b)
2a
H
4-FC6H4-
85 (3c)
80 (4c)
2a
H
3-ClC6H4-
79 (3d)
61 (4d)
2a
H
4-BrC6H4-
77 (3e)
-(4e) a
2a
H
2,4-diFC6H3-
79 (3f)
77 (4f)
2b
4-ClC6H4-
2-FC6H4-
82 (3g)
68 (4g)
2b
4-ClC6H4-
3-FC6H4-
88 (3h)
71 (4h)
2b
4-ClC6H4-
4-FC6H4-
84 (3i)
75 (4i)
2b2b2b
4-ClC6H4-4-ClC6H4-4-ClC6H4-
3-ClC6H4-4-BrC6H4-2,4-diFC6H3-
87 (3j)83 (3k)93 (3l)
59 (4j)-(4k) a69 (4l)
a Compounds 4e and 4k were prepared following an independent route, as described in Scheme 2.
Table 2
Percentage yields of 5a,b; 6a,b and 4e,f.
Substrate
R
5a,b
6a,b
4e,f
1a
H
81 (5a)
77 (6a)
81 (4a)
1b
4-ClC6H4-
88 (5b)
88 (6b)
59 (4k)
2.2. Biological Activity Studies
A series of the analogous 6-substituted 4-aminoquinazoline derivatives have recently been evaluated as potential PI3K inhibitors and were found to exhibit significant anti-proliferative activities against the humancolon cancer (HCT-116) and MCF-7 cell lines [13]. We are interested in breast and cervical cancers, which are the most common cancers in woman of all races throughout the world [14]. In this regard we decided to evaluate compounds 3a–l and 4a–l for potential anti-proliferative activity against two cancer cell lines, namely, the humanbreast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. Since these tumours have been proven to be highly expressed cell line of EGFR, we also evaluated the most active compounds for their ability to inhibit EGFR-TK phosphorylation complemented with molecular docking into EGFR-TK.
2.2.1. Cytotoxicity Studies
The 4-anilinoquinazolines 3a–l and 4a–l were evaluated for growth inhibitory activity against MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines using the well-established 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide based colorimetric cell viability (MTT) assay. The compounds were assayed at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 μM with DMSO and clinical drug Gefitinib as the negative and positive control, respectively. The LC50 values (the lethal concentration at which 50% of cells are killed) of the 24 compounds (the average from three independent experiments) against Gefitinib as a reference drug are represented in Table 3 and Table 4 (see Supplementary Materials for the corresponding cell viability percentages and graphs for each compound). The LC50 values are presented in µM concentrations, taking into account the molecular weights of the compounds. The SAR of these compounds was studied with respect to the nature of substituent at the 2- or 6-position of the heterocyclic framework and the position and type of halogen atoms on the aniline ring. Some of the compounds exhibited comparable or superior anti-proliferative activities as Gefitinib against the two cancer cell lines. No activity was observed for the 2-unsubstituted4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines 3a–f when compared to Gefinitib (Table 3). However, the presence of 4-chlorophenyl group at C-2 resulted in significant cytotoxicity against both cell lines for the corresponding 4-anilino-6-bromoquinazolines derivatives 3g–l. Specifically, the 2-fluoroanilino substituted derivative 3g and the 2,4-difluoroanilino analogue 3l were found to exhibit higher activity against both MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines when compared to the reference drug. Moderate activity against the MCF-7 cell line (LC50 = 0.73 μM), but significant cytotoxicity against the HeLa cells (LC50 = 1.45 μM) were observed for the 3-fluoroaniline–substituted derivative 3h. The presence of chlorine atom at position-3 of the aniline moiety in compound 3j resulted in moderate activity for both cell lines. Diminished activity against both cell lines was observed for compounds 3i and 3k substituted with fluorine or bromine atom at the para-position of the aniline moiety.
Table 3
Cytotoxic effects of 3a–l against MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines. The results are presented as LC50 (μM) ± standard deviation (SD) from three individual experiments.
Compound
R
Ar
LC50 (μM) ± SD
MCF-7
HeLa
3a
H
2-FC6H4-
1.60 ± 0.07
7.78 ±0.11
3b
H
3-FC6H4-
2.67 ± 0.88
3.95 ± 0.44
3c
H
4-FC6H4-
3.52 ± 0.78
3.24 ± 0.18
3d
H
3-ClC6H4-
4.26 ± 1.45
6.99 ± 0.14
3e
H
4-BrC6H4-
8.85 ± 1.22
11.05 ± 2.38
3f
H
2,4-diFC6H3-
1.54 ± 0.59
5.68 ± 1.04
3g
4-ClC6H4-
2-FC6H4-
0.14 ± 0.02
0.57 ± 0.11
3h
4-ClC6H4-
3-FC6H4-
0.73 ± 0.66
1.45 ± 0.39
3i
4-ClC6H4-
4-FC6H4-
1.44 ± 0.41
4.97 ± 0.03
3j
4-ClC6H4-
3-ClC6H4-
0.99 ± 0.18
2.77 ± 0.15
3k
4-ClC6H4-
4-BrC6H4-
2.03 ± 0.03
3.76 ± 0.62
3l
4-ClC6H4-
2,4-diFC6H3-
0.14 ± 0.04
0.18 ± 0.02
Gefitinib
0.51 ± 0.11
2.37± 1.21
Table 4
Cytotoxic effects of 4a–l against MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines.
Compound
R
Ar
LC50 (μM) ± SD
MCF-7
HeLa
4a
H
2-FC6H4-
1.60 ± 0.19
1.60 ± 0.26
4b
H
3-FC6H4-
0.86 ± 0.08
1.24 ± 0.40
4c
H
4-FC6H4-
2.55 ± 0.81
0.55 ± 0.47
4d
H
3-ClC6H4-
7.64 ± 1.88
2.15 ± 0.47
4e
H
4-BrC6H4-
5.65 ± 1.96
3.18 ± 0.69
4f
H
2,4-diFC6H3-
2.09 ± 1.14
2.20 ± 1.78
4g
4-ClC6H4-
2-FC6H4-
1.32 ± 0.68
0.73 ± 0.34
4h
4-ClC6H4-
3-FC6H4-
2.41 ± 1.11
0.87 ± 0.17
4i
4-ClC6H4-
4-FC6H4-
2.70 ± 1.47
1.39 ± 0.32
4j
4-ClC6H4-
3-ClC6H4-
3.09 ± 0.83
5.23 ± 2.32
4k
4-ClC6H4-
4-BrC6H4-
0.90 ± 0.64
0.45 ± 0.29
4l
4-ClC6H4-
2,4-diFC6H3-
0.56 ± 0.21
0.47 ± 0.21
Gefitinib
0.51 ± 0.11
2.37± 1.21
Replacement of the 6-bromine atom with a 4-fluorophenyl group generally resulted in significant cytotoxicity and selectivity against the HeLa cell line for both the 2-unsubstituted 4a–f and their 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives 4g–l (Table 4). Within these series, the 4-bromoanilino substituted derivative 4e was found to exhibit moderate (LC50 = 3.18 μM) cytotoxicity against the HeLa cell line, while the 3-chloroanilino substituted analogue 4j showed reduced activity (LC50 = 5.24 μM) against this cell line when compared to Gefitinib (LC50 = 2.37 μM). Among the 2-unsubstituted derivatives 4a–f, only the 3-fluoroanilino substituted derivative 4b was also found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 cell line with LC50 value of 0.86 μM compared to Gefitinib (LC50 = 0.51 μM). Likewise, within series of the 2-(4-chlorophenyl) substituted derivatives 4g–l, only the 4-bromoanilino derivative 4k and the 2,4-difluoroanilino substituted derivative 4l were found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 cell line with LC50 values 0.90 μM and 0.56 μM, respectively. From these preliminary in vitro cytotoxicity results and SAR, it is observed that the presence of a 4-chlorophenyl group at the 2-position of the 4-(arylamino)quinazolines generally leads to increased cytotoxicity for both series of the 6-substituted 4-anilinoquinazoline derivatives. Increased cytotoxicity against both cell lines is generally enhanced by the presence at position-4 of a 2-fluoroanilino or 2,4-difluoroanilino group as observed for compounds 3g, 3l and 4l. This is probably because a fluorophenyl group on heterocycles enhances biological activity and the lipophilicity of the molecule due to the non-polarisability of the Csp2–F bond [15].
2.2.2. Inhibition of EGFR-TK
The 4-anilinoquinazolines such as Gefitinib are known to produce their anticancer activity through inhibition of EGFR-TK phosphorylation, which results from competitive binding at the ATP site [1,2]. The activity of EGFR-TK is implicated in the progression of breast, ovarian, lung, colon, prostate, and squamous cell head and neck cancers [16]. In order to test whether the 4-anilinoquinazolines prepared in this investigation inhibit the ligand binding-induced receptor phosphorylation, we performed kinase activity of EGFR in the presence of compounds 3g, 3l and 4l. The inhibitory activities of compounds 3g, 3l and 4l to EGFR were tested by ELISA method against Gefitinib as a reference standard. The observed results indicate that these compounds exhibit moderate to significant inhibitory effect against EGFR-TK (Figure 2). A combination of the 2-(4-chlorophenyl) and 4-(2,4-difluoroanilino) groups on the 6-bromoquinazoline framework of derivative 3l resulted in significant inhibitory activity against EGFR-TK with LC50 value of 37.66 nM, which is slightly above that of the clinical drug, Gefitinib (LC50 = 31.44 nM). This is interesting because substitution at the C-2 position of the quinazoline ring, even with a small methyl group, was previously found to diminish activity against EGFR-TK [17]. Although a bulky group at the 6-position of the quinazoline ring can be tolerated [18], the presence of a 4-fluorophenyl group at this position in 4l resulted in reduced EGFR-TK inhibitory (LC50 = 59.21 nM) compared to the corresponding 6-bromo substituted precursor 3l. Previous SAR of the 4-anilinoquinazolines suggested that substantial (up to 10-fold) increase in potency could be achieved by the introduction of small lipophilic groups at the 3-position of the aniline ring [19,20]. We observed significantly reduced EGFR-TK inhibitory effect (LC50 = 70.05 nM) for 3g substituted with a 4-(2-fluoroanilino) group when compared to the 4-(2,4-difluoroanilino)–substituted derivative 3l.
Figure 2
Inhibition (LC50 in nM) of EGFR-TK by 3g, 3l and 4l against Gefitinib.
The difference in activity related to the halogen substitution pattern on the aniline ring may be associated with the flexibility of this moiety, where a distinct spatial arrangement of the molecule could lead to an improved interaction with the active site of the receptor. In order to prove this assumption and further guide SAR studies, we performed molecular docking of compounds 3g, 3l, and 4l into the ATP binding site of EGFR.
2.2.3. Molecular Docking Studies against Gefitinib
Docking simulation was conducted to study the binding affinity of the given compounds toward EGFR-TK. The control docked on Erlotinib (an inhibitor co-crystallized with EGFR-TK in 1M17) resulted root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 1.6 Å from the crystal structure showed the reproducibility of docking simulation (Figure 3). Compound 4l exhibits the highest binding affinity among the docked compounds but comparable with Gefitinib, evidenced from binding free energy calculation of −10.46 and −10.74 kcal/mol, respectively (Table 5). On the other hand, Erlotinib and compounds 3g and 3l have a relatively lower binding free energy of −8.71, −9.14, and −8.83 kcal/mol, respectively. Hydrogen bonding was observed between Erlotinib, Gefitinib, compound 3g and 3l. All the hydrogen bonds were within the distance of 2.2 Å, thus showed good binding affinity with EGFR binding pocket (Figure 3). The docked conformation of Gefitinib showed the position of the morpholine region interacts with EGRK-TK Phe699benzene ring at antiparallel orientation. The 2,4-difluorophenyl region of compounds 3l and 4l and the 2-fluorophenyl region of compound 3g also showed T-shape ring stacking interactions with Phe799benzene ring. Compound 3g and 3l have similar binding poses. Compound 4l, which is bulkier in size, could have more interactions with the binding pocket residues of EGFR, thus a better binding affinity compared with compounds 3g and 3l. From the binding mode, it could be assumed that the synthesised substances might act on the ATP binding site of EGFR like Erlotinib or Gefitinib do.
Figure 3
Docked conformation of Erlotinib (as control, red stick), Gefitinib (green stick), compound 3g (yellow stick), 3l (blue stick), and 4l (cyan stick) in the binding pocket of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain (surface and ribbon representation). Black dotted lines are the direct hydrogen bonding formed between docked compound and EGFR. Crystal erlotinib is in a coloured atom-type stick presentation.
Table 5
Calculated binding free energy and estimated inhibition constant (K) of Erlotinib (as control), Gefitinib, and compounds 3g, 3l, and 4l with EGFR-TK.
Ligand
Hb Distance (Å)
Hb Interacting Atoms
FEB (kcal/mol)
Ic, Ki (nM)
Control (Erlotinib)
2.2
Met769 O–Erl HN2
−8.71
414.12
Gefitinib
1.9
Thr766 OG1–Gef HN
−10.74
13.34
3g
2.1
Asp831 OD2–3g HN
−9.14
200.91
3l
2.1
Asp831 OD2–3l HN
−8.83
337.36
4l
-
-
−10.46
21.60
Hb: Hydrogen bond; FEB: Free energy of binding; Ic: Estimated inhibition constant.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. General
Melting points were recorded on a Thermocouple digital melting point apparatus (Mettler Toledo LLC, Columbus, OH, USA). IR spectra were recorded as powders using a Bruker VERTEX 70 FT-IR Spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA) with a diamond ATR (attenuated total reflectance) accessory by using the thin-film method. For column chromatography, Merck kieselgel 60 (0.063–0.200 mm) (Merck KGaA, Frankfurt, Germany) was used as stationary phase. NMR spectra were obtained as CDCl3 solutions using Agilent 500 MHz NMR (Agilent Technologies, Oxford, UK) spectrometer and the chemical shifts are quoted relative to the TMS peak. Low- and high-resolution mass spectra were recorded at an ionisation potential of 70 eV using Waters Synapt G2 Quadrupole Time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) at the University of Stellenbosch Central Analytical Facility.
3.2. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds and
A stirred mixture of 2-amino-5-bromobenzamide (1.0 equiv.), aldehyde (1.5 equiv.) and iodine (2.0 equiv.) in ethanol (6.0 mL/mmol of benzamide) in a round-bottomed flask equipped with a stirrer bar and a condenser was refluxed for 8 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature. An ice-cold saturated aqueous solution of sodium thiosulphate was added to the mixture and the resultant precipitate was filtered and washed with cold water. The product was recrystallized from acetonitrile. Compounds 1a and 1b were prepared in this fashion.6-Bromoquinazolin-4(3H)-one (1a). A mixture of 2-amino-5-bromobenzamide (1.00 g, 4.65 mmol), paraformaldehyde (0.21 g, 6.97 mmol) and iodine (2.36 g, 9.30 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL) afforded 1a as a white solid (0.95 g, 91%), mp. 278–280 °C (lit. [21] 273–275 °C); νmax (ATR) 493, 563, 622, 824, 924, 1237, 1271, 1316, 1387, 1462, 1603, 1688, 2809, 3445 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.59 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (dd, J = 2.5 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 12.40 (br s, 1H).6-Bromo-2-(4-chlorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (1b). A mixture of 2-amino-5-bromobenzamide (1.00 g, 4.65 mmol), 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (0.97 g, 6.97 mmol) and iodine (2.36 g, 9.30 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL) afforded 1b as a white solid (1.45 g, 93%), mp. 342–344 °C; νmax (ATR) 538, 559, 649, 728, 831, 940, 1091, 1276, 1413, 1460, 1556, 1601, 1672, 3442 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (dd, J = 2.5 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.19 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 12.76 (brs, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 104.7, 112.5, 112.9, 119.9, 128.4, 129.2, 129.9, 130.2, 138.0, 139.1, 155.3, 159.3; m/z 335 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 334.9578. C14H979Br35ClN2O+ requires 334.9587.
3.3. Typical Procedure for the Chlorination–Dehydration of and to Afford and , Respectively
Synthesis of 6-Bromo-4-chloroquinazoline (2a). Triethylamine (4 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature to a stirred mixture of 1a (0.50 g, 2.22 mmol) and phosphoryl chloride (10 mL) in a round-bottomed flask. The reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 5 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature. Ice-cold water was added to the mixture and the product was extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with an aqueous solution of NaHCO3, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to afford 2a as a white solid (0.46 g, 85%), mp. 164–166 °C (lit. [20] 161–163 °C); νmax (ATR) 499, 539, 850, 1021, 1169, 1271, 1352, 1389, 1468, 1474, 1560, 1630, 2932 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (dd, J = 2.5 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 9.03 (s, 1H).Synthesis of 6-Bromo-4-chloro-3-(4-chlorophenyl)quinazoline (2b). A stirred mixture of 1b (0.50 g, 1.49 mmol), trimethylamine (4 mL), and phosphoryl chloride (10 mL) afforded 2b as a yellow solid (0.48 g, 91%), mp. 244–246 °C; νmax (ATR) 505, 531, 732, 829, 991, 1090, 1294, 1318, 1402, 1415, 1469, 1493, 1539, 1556, 1592, 1633 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.48 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 2.5 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 104.8, 112.5, 112.9, 128.5, 129.2, 129.9, 130.2, 138.0, 139.2, 149.1, 152.0 159.3; m/z (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 334.9571. C14H979Br35Cl2+ requires 334.9587.
3.4. Typical Procedure for the Amination of and to Afford Compounds – and –, Respectively
3.6. Reaction Sequence for the Preparation of and from and , Respectively
3.6.1. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 5a and 5b
6-(4-Fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (5a). A mixture of 6-bromoquinazolin-4(3H)-one 1a (0.50 g, 2.22 mmol) PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.078 g, 0.11 mmol) and K2CO3 (0.46 g, 3.33 mmol) in dioxane-water (20 mL) in a two-necked round-bottomed flask was purged with argon gas for 30 minutes. 4-Fluorophenylboronic acid (0.37 g, 2.66 mmol) in dioxane (10 mL) was added via a syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 3 h until the starting material was completely consumed (TLC monitoring). After cooling the mixture, the product was extracted with chloroform and the combined organic layers were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by recrystallization from acetonitrile to afford 5a as a white solid (0.43 g, 81%), mp. 228–230 °C; νmax (ATR) 496, 698, 746, 821, 923, 1160, 1239, 1275, 1333, 1384, 1477, 1603, 1687, 2673, 3046 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.31 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.09 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 12.30 (br.s, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.4 (d, 2JCF = 21.7 Hz), 123.2, 123.6, 127.8, 129.4 (d, 3JCF = 7.9 Hz), 133.4 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 134.0, 135.5, 135.6, 138.0, 146.4, 162.6 (d, 1JCF = 240.5 Hz); m/z 241 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 241.0780. C14H10FN2O+ requires 241.0777.2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-6-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (5b). A mixture of 6-bromo-2-(4-chlorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one 1b (0.5 g, 1.49 mmol) PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.052 g, 0.074 mmol), 4-fluorophenylboronic acid (0.25 g, 1.78 mmol) and K2CO3 (0.31 g, 2.23 mmol) in dioxane-water (30 mL) afforded 5b as a white solid (0.46 g, 88%), mp. 151–153 °C; νmax (ATR) 501, 539, 693, 719, 752, 825, 1118, 1180, 1190, 1308, 1436, 1483, 1603, 1674, 2926, 3056 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.32 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.79–7.85 (m, 3H), 8.13 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 12.67 (br.s, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.4 (d, 2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 122.6, 128.3, 128.5, 128.9, 129.1, 129.2 (d, 3JCF = 8.6 Hz), 130.1, 131.8, 132.4 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 136.4, 144.8, 146.3, 148.9, 161.2, 162.5 (d, 1JCF = 243.5 Hz); m/z 351 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 351.0702. C20H1335ClFN2O requires 351.0700.
3.6.2. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 6a and 6b
4-Chloro-6-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (6a). Triethylamine (4 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature to a stirred mixture of 5a (0.40 g, 1.66 mmol) and phosphoryl chloride (10 mL) in a round-bottomed flask. The reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 5 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature. Ice-cold water was added to the mixture and the product was extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with an aqueous solution of NaHCO3, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to afford 6a as a white solid (0.33 g, 77%), mp. 154–156 °C (EtOH); νmax (ATR) 478, 513, 523, 697, 825, 991, 1096, 1146, 1225, 1335, 1484, 1511, 1545, 1565, 1600 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.16 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.3 (d, 2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 122.8, 123.1, 128.8, 129.2 (d, 3JCF = 8.3 Hz), 132.3, 134.1 (d, 4JCF = 3.2 Hz), 136.7, 149.8, 157.7, 159.0, 162.4 (d, 1JCF = 240.2 Hz); m/z 258 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 257.8652. C14H835ClFN2 requires 257.8652.4-Chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (6b). A mixture of 5b (0.40 g, 1.14 mmol), trimethylamine (4 mL) and phosphoryl chloride (10 mL) afforded 6b as a white solid (0.35 g, 83%), mp. 216–218 °C (EtOH); νmax (ATR) 514, 553, 700, 735, 778, 821, 988, 1010, 1088, 1162, 1237, 1360, 1401, 1431, 1492, 1514, 1554, 1604 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.31 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.79–7.84 (m, 3H), 8.13 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.31 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.2 (d, 2JCF = 20.4 Hz), 121.3, 123.4, 125.6, 128.7, 128.9, 129.1 (d, 3JCF = 8.3 Hz), 130.2, 131.9, 134.6 (d, 4JCF = 3.2 Hz), 138.4, 139.8, 148.6, 157.8, 158.2, 162.6 (d, 1JCF = 245.3 Hz); m/z 368 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 368.0435. C20H1235Cl2FN2 requires 368.0273.
3.6.3. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 4e and 4k
[6-(4-Fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4-yl]-4-bromophenylamine (4e). A mixture of 6a (0.30 g, 1.16 mmol), 4-bromaniline (0.22 g, 1.28 mmol) and concentrated HCl (0.01 g, 0.27 mmol) in 3:1 THF-isopropanol (v/v, 10 mL) in a round-bottomed flask was stirred under reflux for 5 h. The mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature and quenched with ice-cold water. The product was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were washed with an aqueous solution of NaHCO3, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford 4e as a white solid (0.37 g, 81%), mp. 227–229 °C; Rf (1:1, toluene/ethyl acetate) 0.69; νmax (ATR) 477, 507, 662, 823, 925, 1006, 1160, 1232, 1358, 1416, 1487, 1498, 1523, 1560, 1603, 3280 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.38 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (s, 1H), 8.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 9.96 (s, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 115.8, 115.8, 116.3 (d, 2JCF = 21.7 Hz), 120.8, 124.7, 128.9, 129.6 (d, 3JCF = 8.0 Hz), 131.7, 132.3, 136.0 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 137.5, 138.9, 149.4, 154.8, 158.1, 162.6 (d, 1JCF = 242.8 Hz); m/z 394 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 394.0356. C20H1479BrFN3+ requires 394.0356.[2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-6-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4-yl]-4-bromophenylamine (4k). A mixture of 6b (0.30 g, 0.81 mmol), 4-bromoaniline (0.15 g, 0.89 mmol) and concentrated HCl (0.01 g, 0.27 mmol) in 3:1 THF-isopropanol (v/v, 10 mL) afforded 4k as a white solid (0.32 g, 79%), mp. 257–260 °C; Rf (toluene) 0.36; νmax (ATR) 499, 521, 666, 740, 817, 1012, 1090, 1161, 1230, 1354, 1398, 1417, 1489, 1511, 1525, 1557, 1595, 3428 cm-1; δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.39 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.87–7.96 (m, 5H), 8.20 (dd, J = 2.5 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.82 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 10.19 (s, 1H); δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 114.5, 116.2, 116.3 (d, 2JCF = 20.7 Hz), 120.9, 124.9, 129.1, 129.2, 129.3, 129.5 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 130.1, 131.8, 131.9, 132.7, 135.8, 135.9 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 137.5, 138.8, 158.3, 158.4, 162.7 (d, 1JCF = 243.7 Hz); m/z 504 (100, M + H); HRMS (ES): found 504.0278. C26H1779Br35ClFN3+ requires 504.0282.
3.7. Materials and Methods for the In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
The 4-anilinoquinazolines 3a–l and 4a–l were evaluated for growth inhibitory activity against the MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines against Gefitnib as a reference standard using the MTT assay developed by Mosmann [22] with slight modification as described in our previous investigation [9]. The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the following formula:The LC50 values (the lethal concentration at which 50% of the cells are killed) were calculated as the concentration of the test sample that resulted in 50% reduction of absorbance compared to untreated cells. The intensity of the MTT formazan produced by living metabolically active cells is directly proportional to the number of live cells present.
3.8. Inhibition of EGFR-TK
The inhibitory activities of compounds 3g, 3l, 4l and Gefitinib towards EGFR-TK were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique with purified Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Sigma-Aldrich, Bradford, UK). The procedure was carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Ninety-six-well plates were pre-coated with 100 µL of a 4:1 poly(Glu,Tyr) solution (5 mg/mL) at 37 °C overnight. The enzyme reaction was conducted in freshly prepared kinase reaction buffer (25 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 2 mmol/L MnCl2, 100 µmol/L Na3VO4 and 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol). Ten microlitres of the test samples at six different concentrations (0.005–0.2 µM) and 20 µL of dilute solution of purified recombinant EGFR tyrosine kinase proteins were added to each reaction well. The kinase reaction was initiated by the addition of 50 µL of a solution of adenosine-5′-triphosphate, disodium salt (5 mmol/L). DMSO and EGFR (without any test sample) were also included in this experiment as negative and positive controls, respectively. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Phosphorylated proteins were probed with monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody produced in mouse (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After another 1 h incubation at 37 °C, the plates were again washed three times with PBS, followed by the addition 100 µL of freshly prepared peroxidase substrate solution. After incubation in the dark for extra 10 min, the reaction was terminated by adding 100 µL of 2 M H2SO4 solution. The plates were analysed using the Thermo Varioskan Flash Spectral Scanning Multimode Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 492 nm. The assay was performed in triplicate. The EGFR-TK inhibition percentage was determined as follows:
where OD is the optical density.The half-maximal inhibitory concentration value (LC50) was obtained from the curves of percentage inhibition.
3.9. Molecular Docking Studies
3.9.1. Protein Structure
The starting structure of EFGR-TK was obtained from RCSB PDB (PDB id: 1M17) [23] and all water molecules and heteroatoms were removed. The polar hydrogen atoms, Kollman–Amber united atom charges and solvation parameters were then added using AutoDockTools [24].
3.9.2. Ligand Structure
The starting coordinates of the ligand for control docking (erlotinib) was obtained from the heteroatoms in the EFGR-TK crystal (PDB id: 1M17) and the coordinates for Gefitinib and compounds 3g, 3l and 4l were generated using ChemDraw Professional 15.0 (PerkinElmer Informatics, Waltham, MA, USA). Gefitinib and compounds 3g, 3l and 4l were minimised with Chem3D module in ChemOffice Professional 15.0 (PerkinElmer Informatics). All polar hydrogen atoms for the ligands were left intact. The Gasteiger chargers and torsional angles of the ligands were assigned with AutoDockTools [24]. Standard protocol from AutoDock4.2 [24] for hydrated docking was applied where water molecules were added randomly around the ligands.
3.9.3. Molecular Docking Simulation
Grid maps were centred at the ligand binding site in EGFR-TK crystal (PDB id: 1M17) with 90 × 90 × 90 points with 0.375 Å spacing. Lamarckian genetic algorithm of 1,000,000 energy evaluations per run and a maximum number of 27,000 generation was applied. The number of individuals in population was 350 and the crossover rate was 0.8. The docked conformations were clustered with root mean square of 2.0 Å from 200 docking runs.
4. Conclusions
In summary, a series of novel 4-(halogenophenylamino)-6-bromoquinazolines and their 6-(4-fluorophenyl)–substituted derivatives was designed, synthesised, and evaluated for cytotoxicity in vitro. Most of the synthesised compounds exhibited inhibitory activity against MCF-7 and HeLa cells. SAR based on these in vitro cytotoxicity results revealed that the presence of a 4-fluorophenyl- or 2,4-difluorophenylaniline is more desirable for cytotoxicity against both cell lines. A combination of 2-(4-chlorophenyl) and 6-(4-fluorophenyl) substituents favours activity against HeLa cells more so than the MCF-5 cell line. Compound 3l not only demonstrated strong anti-proliferation activities against the two cancer cell lines, but also showed significant inhibitory activity (LC50 = 37.66 nM) towards EGFR, comparable to that of the medicinally important EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib (LC50 = 31.44 nM). Molecular docking (in silico) studies suggested that the title compounds bind nicely to the region of EGFR, with comparable binding affinity with Gefitinib. The observed increased in vitro cytotoxicity and inhibitory activity against EGFR-TK due to the presence of a 2-(4-halogenophenyl) substituent encourages further elaboration of this position to lead to derivatives with anticancer properties.
Authors: Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Andrew S Felts; Sam A Saleh; Uyen Le; Alice L Rodriguez; C David Weaver; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley; Kyle A Emmitte Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Tarfah Al-Warhi; Ahmed M El Kerdawy; Mohamed A Said; Amgad Albohy; Zainab M Elsayed; Nada Aljaeed; Eslam B Elkaeed; Wagdy M Eldehna; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz; Miral A Abdelmoaz Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Sajid Hussain; He Liufang; Syed Majid Shah; Fawad Ali; Saeed Ahmad Khan; Fawad Ali Shah; Jing Bo Li; Shupeng Li Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 5.988