| Literature DB >> 29155829 |
Maria Romina Rivero1,2, Carlos De Angelo2,3,4, Pablo Nuñez1,2, Martín Salas1, Carlos E Motta5, Alicia Chiaretta5, Oscar D Salomón1,2, Song Liang6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intestinal parasitoses are a major concern for public health, especially in children from middle and low-income populations of tropical and subtropical areas. We examined the presence and co-infection of parasites in humans as well as parasitic environmental contamination in Puerto Iguazú, Argentina. We explored the environmental and socio-demographic characteristics of the persistence of parasites in children and their environment. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29155829 PMCID: PMC5714390 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Study area.
Location of the Iguazú Municipality in the tri-border area of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay (inset) and detail of the main areas of the study area showing the grid used for the environmental survey. This map was created with ArcGIS 10.4 (www.arcgis.com).
Socio-environmental variables.
| Level | Group of variables | Variables | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation | |||
| Street density | |||
| Trees | |||
| Presence of dogs | |||
| Sex | |||
| Wasted | |||
| Previous drug supply | |||
| Hand washing | |||
| Economic status | |||
| Peridomiciliary hygiene | |||
| Origin of vegetables | |||
| Tap water consumption | |||
| Children per family | |||
| Rodents | |||
| Co-contamination (household area) | |||
| Water supply(PHCC area) | |||
| Co-contamination (PHCC area) |
List and characteristics of socio-environmental variables included in the study. Variables at the environmental conditions’ level were used to characterize the environmental sampling sites. Variables at the individual, household and Primary Health Care Center (PHCC) levels were used to characterize human samples.
Fig 2Location of the household surveyed in this study along the Puerto Iguazú Municipality.
All the households are grouped by the corresponding Public Health Care Center (PHCC), delimitating the neighborhood by the minimum convex polygon comprising the entire households related to each PHCC. This map was created with ArcGIS 10.4 (www.arcgis.com).
Fig 3Predicted co-contamination with parasites in the Iguazú Municipality.
Survey results and map of the predicted of number of parasite species (co-contamination). The parks of the city under study are shown in the figure. This map was created with ArcGIS 10.4 (www.arcgis.com).
Environmental contamination with parasite structures and parasite infection in asymptomatic children.
| Parasite species or groups | Prevalence (%) | Co-contamination (%) | Prevalence (%) | Multi-parasitism in children (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog | Soil | Site | 1 sp | 2 spp | 3 spp | 4 spp | 5 spp | Children | Mono | Double | Triple | Quadruple | |
| 63.8 | 37.5 | 71.5 | 45.1 | 38.3 | 11.3 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 58.8 | 65.8 | 28.2 | 5.3 | 0.7 | |
| 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 0.0 | |
| 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 1.3 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 16.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 23.0 | 56.3 | 37.5 | 5.4 | 0.9 | |
| Hookworms | 55.6 | 28.8 | 62.0 | 41.2 | 39.5 | 13.2 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 4.4 | 38.1 | 42.9 | 19.0 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 21.7 | 56.7 | 18.3 | 3.3 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.9 | 22.2 | 11.1 | 55.6 | 11.1 | |
| 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3.9 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 9.1 | 90.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 13.4 | 6.0 | 16.3 | 13.3 | 43.3 | 33.3 | 10.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 12.1 | 3.8 | 15.2 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 21.4 | 14.3 | 3.6 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 70.0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.6 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | |
| 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 51.6 | 32.3 | 12.9 | 3.2 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 6.9 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 8.3 | 29.0 | 57.9 | 35.0 | 5.7 | 1.4 | |
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | |
| 1.7 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 28.6 | 28.6 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
The prevalence shows the proportion of contaminated soil samples and sampling sites, and the percentage of infected dog and human samples. The co-contamination and multi-parasitism in children show the percentage of sites or children with the different levels of parasitism, and the frequency distribution of each species or species’ group along the different levels.
Factors predicting environmental contamination with parasites structures.
| Presence of parasite contamination | Co-contamination with parasite structures | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. Error | p | Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. Error | p |
| (Intercept) | 0.193 | 0.272 | 0.479 | (Intercept) | -42.629 | 10.274 | |
| | |||||||
| Street density | 0.019 | 0.006 | Surface temperature | 0.144 | 0.034 | ||
| (Intercept) | 0.288 | 0.289 | 0.319 | (Intercept) | -0.063 | 0.147 | 0.663 |
| | |||||||
| Trash | 0.904 | 0.371 | Trash | 0.356 | 0.170 | ||
| (Intercept) | -0.371 | 0.409 | 0.364 | (Intercept) | -41.523 | 12.916 | |
| | |||||||
| Street density | 0.015 | 0.007 | Surface temperature | 0.139 | 0.043 | ||
| | |||||||
| Trash | 0.961 | 0.381 | Trash | 0.373 | 0.170 | ||
Final models obtained for predicting parasite contamination (A) and co-contamination (B) in the environment at the Iguazú Municipality. The goodness of fit (GOF) of the models was evaluated in a hierarchical comparison with other candidate models by the AICc (see S7 and S8 Tables) and (log)-likelihood ratio tests. Binomial models (A1 to A3) were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the co-contamination models (B1 to B3) by the Spearman’s rank correlation (rho) between observed and predicted levels of co-contamination. A 2-fold cross-validation was used for landscape models.
Multilevel factors affecting children infection and co-infection with parasites.
| Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. Error | p | Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. Error | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | -35,282 | 12,021 | (Intercept) | -13,156 | 0.3409 | ||
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| Age group 2 | 0.747 | 0.263 | Age group 2 | 0.460 | 0.113 | ||
| Age group 3 | 0.202 | 0.292 | 0.489 | Age group 3 | 0.222 | 0.146 | 0.129 |
| | |||||||
| Obese or overweight | -11,952 | 0.360 | - | ||||
| | |||||||
| Previous deworming treatment | 0.581 | 0.340 | 0.088 | - | |||
| | |||||||
| Playing with soil | 20,535 | 0.484 | Playing with soil | 0.201 | 0.110 | 0.067 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| Unsatisfied Basic Needs | 17,137 | 0.8729 | 0.050 | - | |||
| | |||||||
| Tap water | 10,442 | 0.575 | 0.069 | Safe excreta disposal | -0.322 | 0.102 | |
| | |||||||
| Single mother | 12,028 | 0.675 | 0.075 | More than 3 child | 0.382 | 0.106 | |
| Mother literacy | -11,029 | 0.560 | |||||
| Overcrowding | 0.368 | 0.1855 | |||||
| Mean predicted co-contamination | 0.630 | 0.238 | |||||
Final models obtained for predicting parasite infection (model C: binomial distribution) and co-infection level (model D: Poisson distribution) in the child population of Iguazú Municipality. These models resulted from a GLMM with the household (family) and the Primary Health Care Center (neighborhood) as random effects. The goodness of fit (GOF) of the models was evaluated in a hierarchical comparison with other candidate models by the AICc (see S10 and S11 Tables) and (log)-likelihood ratio tests. Binomial models (C) were also evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the co-infection models (D) by the Spearman’s rank correlation (rho) between observed and predicted levels of co-infection.
Fig 4Environmental contamination and children health at a neighborhood scale.
The map shows the spatial relationship between the environmental co-contamination predicted at a neighborhood level and the multi-parasitoses found in the children population of each neighborhood. This map was created with ArcGIS 10.4 (www.arcgis.com).