| Literature DB >> 33392375 |
Andrea Celina Falcone1, María Lorena Zonta1, Juan Manuel Unzaga2, Graciela Teresa Navone1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims were to diagnose intestinal parasites in migrant horticultural families in the rural area of La Plata, and assess factors that increase the risk of parasitic infection.Entities:
Keywords: Horticulturist; Intestinal parasites; Migrant population; Rural area; Socio-environmental characteristic
Year: 2020 PMID: 33392375 PMCID: PMC7772683 DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: One Health ISSN: 2352-7714
Fig. 1Geographic location of Argentina in South America and Buenos Aires province in Argentina (A), District of La Plata (B) and rural sampling areas analyzed (C). LP: La Plata city; 1: Abasto (sampling site 1), 2: Melchor Romero (sampling site 2), 3: Angel Etcheverry (sampling site 3), 4: El Peligro (sampling site 4).
Absolute frequency and prevalence (%) of parasite species detected in the population from rural area.
| Parasite species | Absolute frequency | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Parasitized | 277 | 79.1 |
| Protozoa | 258 | 73.7 |
| 206 | 58.9 | |
| 84 | 24.0 | |
| 9 | 2.6 | |
| 92 | 26.3 | |
| 51 | 15.7 | |
| 8 | 2.3 | |
| 6 | 1.7 | |
| 2 | 0.6 | |
| Helminths | 95 | 27.1 |
| 91 | 26.0 | |
| 4 | 1.1 | |
| 2 | 0.6 | |
| 1 | 0.3 |
Prevalence estimated in relation to total number of analyzed population (n = 350).
Socio-economic variables of the analyzed population from rural area.
| Socio-economic characteristics | Frequency | |
|---|---|---|
| n | % | |
| Nationality | ||
| Argentinian | 93 | 26.6 |
| Bolivian | 233 | 66.6 |
| Paraguayan | 13 | 3.7 |
| Peruvian | 2 | 0.6 |
| Not answered | 9 | 2.6 |
| Mother's education | ||
| Unschooled | 0 | 0.0 |
| Primary | 197 | 56.3 |
| Secondary | 55 | 15.7 |
| Tertiary/University | 0 | 0.0 |
| Not answered | 98 | 28.0 |
| Father's education | ||
| Unschooled | 0 | 0.0 |
| Primary | 197 | 56.3 |
| Secondary | 46 | 13.1 |
| Tertiary/University | 0 | 0.0 |
| Not answered | 107 | 30.7 |
| Mother's employment | ||
| Unemployed/housewife | 0 | 0.0 |
| Temporary | 349 | 99.7 |
| Employed or freelance | 1 | 0.3 |
| Not answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Father's employment | ||
| Unemployed | 0 | 0.0 |
| Temporary | 349 | 99.7 |
| Employed or freelance | 1 | 0.3 |
| Not answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Monetary support | 165 | 47.6 |
| Food support | 23 | 6.6 |
| Farming practice | 350 | 100.0 |
| Animal husbandry | 59 | 17.0 |
| Greenhouse | 350 | 100.0 |
| Health insurance | 30 | 8.6 |
| Pet ownership | ||
| Dog | 345 | 98.6 |
| Cat | 47 | 13.4 |
Frequency was estimated in relation to the total population with socio-economic data (n = 350).
Socio-environmental variables of the analyzed population from rural area.
| Structural qualities and amenities | Frequency | |
|---|---|---|
| n | % | |
| Lodging or house tenure status | ||
| House owner | 50 | 14.3 |
| Lease holder | 255 | 72.8 |
| Free lodging | 0 | 0.0 |
| Not answered | 45 | 12.9 |
| Building materials | ||
| Fired-brick masonry | 104 | 29.7 |
| Sheet and wood | 246 | 70.3 |
| Makeshift material | 0 | 0.0 |
| Not answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Flooring | ||
| Concrete or other | 316 | 90.3 |
| Dirt | 31 | 8.9 |
| Not answered | 3 | 0.8 |
| Wastewater disposal | ||
| Sewage system | 5 | 1.4 |
| Septic tank | 209 | 59.7 |
| Latrine | 131 | 37.4 |
| Open-air defecation | 5 | 1.4 |
| Not answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Drinking water (main source) | ||
| Piped water system | 16 | 4.6 |
| Protected well | 334 | 95.4 |
| Public tap | 0 | 0.0 |
| Not answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Solid waste disposal | ||
| Public waste collection | 67 | 19.1 |
| Incineration or non-sanitary burial | 259 | 74.0 |
| Open-air pits | 24 | 6.9 |
| Non-answered | 0 | 0.0 |
| Flooding | ||
| Never | 156 | 44.6 |
| Occasionally | 90 | 25.7 |
| Always | 33 | 9.4 |
| Not answered | 71 | 20.3 |
| Overcrowding (more than three people per room) | 174 | 66.2 |
| Bed-sharing | 133 | 49.6 |
| Received prior information on intestinal parasites | 195 | 55.7 |
Frequency was estimated in relation to the total population with socio-environmental variables data (n = 350).
Fig. 2Analyzed people correlated with the precariousness indicator and sampling site from rural area (1: Abasto, 2: Melchor Romero, 3: Angel Etcheverry, 4: El Peligro).
Risk factors for intestinal parasites in the analyzed population from rural areaa.
| Risk factors | Model coefficients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | OR | ||
| Participants from 13 to 17 years | −1.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.01 |
| Participants ≥18 years | −0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.66 |
| Sampling site 1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 0.03 |
| Sampling site 3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 0.01 |
| Sampling site 4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 0.04 |
| Basic education | −0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.04 |
β (beta): regression coefficient; SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio.
p value <0.05.
p value <0.01.
Other models were considered but only the ones selected are shown. Selected model: Residual deviance = 183.8; Akaike Information Criterion = 197.8.