Literature DB >> 29155339

Body mass index predicts risk of complications in lumbar spine surgery based on surgical invasiveness.

Olivia J Bono1, Gregory W Poorman1, Norah Foster1, Cyrus M Jalai1, Samantha R Horn1, Jonathan Oren1, Alexandra Soroceanu2, Subaraman Ramachandran1, Taylor E Purvis3, Deeptee Jain4, Shaleen Vira1, Bassel G Diebo5, Breton Line1, Daniel M Sciubba3, Themistocles S Protopsaltis1, Aaron J Buckland1, Thomas J Errico1, Virginie Lafage6, Shay Bess1, Peter G Passias7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obesity as a comorbidity in spine pathology may increase the risk of complications following surgical treatment. The body mass index (BMI) threshold at which obesity becomes clinically relevant, and the exact nature of that effect, remains poorly understood.
PURPOSE: Identify the BMI that independently predicts risk of postoperative complications following lumbar spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Retrospective review of the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) years 2011-2013. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 31,763 patients were undergoing arthrodesis, discectomy, laminectomy, laminoplasty, corpectomy, or osteotomy of the lumbar spine. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates.
METHODS: The patient sample was categorized preoperatively by BMI according to the World Health Organization stratification: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal overweight (BMI 20.0-29.9), obesity class 1 (BMI 30.0-34.9), 2 (BMI 35.0-39.9), and 3 (BMI≥40). Patients were dichotomized based on their position above or below the 75th surgical invasiveness index (SII) percentile cutoff into low-SII and high-SII. Differences in complication rates in BMI groups were analyzed by Bonferroni analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. Multivariate binary logistic regression evaluated relationship between BMI and complication categories in all patients and in high-SII and low-SII surgeries.
RESULTS: Controlling for baseline difference in SII, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking, complications significantly increased at a BMI of 35 kg/m2. The odds ratios for any complication (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]; obesity 2: 1.218 [1.020-1.455]; obesity 3: 1.742 [1.439-2.110]), infection (obesity 2: 1.335 [1.110-1.605]; obesity 3: 1.685 [1.372-2.069]), and surgical complication (obesity 2: 1.622 [1.250-2.104]; obesity 3: 2.798 [2.154-3.634]) were significantly higher in obesity classes 2 and 3 relative to the normal-overweight cohort (all p<.05).
CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in complications, specifically infection and surgical complications, in patients with BMI≥35 following lumbar spine surgery, with that rate further increasing with BMI≥40.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Lumbar; Obesity; Predictor; Risk; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29155339     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

Review 1.  Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Scott D Daffner; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sanford E Emery; John C France; Cara L Sedney
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Towards personalized and value-based spine care: objective patient monitoring with smartphone activity data.

Authors:  Hasan S Ahmad; Andrew I Yang; Gregory W Basil; William C Welch; Michael Y Wang; Jang W Yoon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients over 80: is there an increased risk?

Authors:  Frédérick Rault; Anaïs R Briant; Hervé Kamga; Thomas Gaberel; Evelyne Emery
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Is frailty responsive to surgical correction of adult spinal deformity? An investigation of sagittal re-alignment and frailty component drivers of postoperative frailty status.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Frank A Segreto; Kevin A Moattari; Renaud Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton G Line; Robert K Eastlack; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  [Research progress in effect of obesity on the effectiveness of posterior lumbar fusion].

Authors:  Yuzhu Xu; Yuntao Wang; Feng Jiang; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

6.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of T9-T10 fracture in a patient with morbid obesity and ankylosing spondylitis: A case report with literature review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Streltzov; Linton T Evans; M Dustin Boone; Brandon K Root; Daniel R Calnan; Erik J Kobylarz; Yinchen Song
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-03-26

7.  Extreme body mass index is associated with poor survival outcomes after radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Shenye Jin; Shenghua Liu; Jiang Geng
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

8.  Underweight patients are an often under looked "At risk" population after undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Paul S Bagi; Rohil Malpani; Anoop R Galivanche; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-12-10

9.  Underweight patients are at just as much risk as super morbidly obese patients when undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Rohil Malpani; Anoop R Galivanche; Cheryl K Zogg; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Influence of dynamic preoperative body mass index changes on patient-reported outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Alessandro Siccoli; Marc L Schröder; Victor E Staartjes
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.