Literature DB >> 32194246

Underweight patients are at just as much risk as super morbidly obese patients when undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

Taylor D Ottesen1, Rohil Malpani1, Anoop R Galivanche1, Cheryl K Zogg1, Arya G Varthi1, Jonathan N Grauer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Past studies have focused on the association of high body mass index (BMI) on spine surgery outcomes. These investigations have reported mixed conclusions, possible due to insufficient power, poor controlling of confounding variables, and inconsistent definitions of BMI categories (e.g. underweight, overweight, and obese). Few studies have considered outcomes of patients with low BMI.
PURPOSE: To analyze how anterior cervical spine surgery outcomes track with World Health Organization categories of BMI to better assess where along the BMI spectrum patients are at risk for adverse perioperative outcomes. DESIGN/
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery were abstracted from the 2005 to 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day adverse events, hospital readmissions, postoperative infections, and mortality.
METHODS: Patients undergoing anterior cervical spine procedures (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior cervical corpectomy, cervical arthroplasty) were identified in the 2005 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were then aggregated into modified World Health Organization categories of BMI. Odds ratios of adverse outcomes, normalized to average risk of normal weight subjects (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), were calculated. Multivariate analyses were then performed on aggregated adverse outcome categories controlling for demographics (age, sex, functional status) and overall health as measured by the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.
RESULTS: In total, 51,149 anterior cervical surgery patients met inclusion criteria. Multivariate analyses revealed the odds of any adverse event to be significantly elevated for underweight and super morbidly obese patients (Odds Ratios [OR] of 1.62 and 1.55, respectively). Additionally, underweight patients had elevated odds of serious adverse events (OR=1.74) and postoperative infections (OR=1.75) and super morbidly obese patients had elevated odds of minor adverse events (OR=1.72). Relative to normal BMI patients, there was no significant elevation for any adverse outcomes for any of the other overweight/obese categories, in fact some had reduced odds of various adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Underweight and super morbidly obese patients have the greatest odds of adverse outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery. The current study identifies underweight patients as an at-risk population that has previously not received significant focus. Physicians and healthcare systems should give additional consideration to this population, as they often already do for those at the other end of the BMI spectrum.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP); Anterior cervical spine; Body mass index (BMI); Mortality; Perioperative adverse events; Readmission; Risk factors; Underweight

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32194246      PMCID: PMC7380546          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.297


  32 in total

1.  Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes.

Authors:  Patawut Bovonratwet; Matthew L Webb; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Adam M Lukasiewicz; Jonathan J Cui; Ryan P McLynn; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Inflammatory lipid mediators in adipocyte function and obesity.

Authors:  Abishek Iyer; David P Fairlie; Johannes B Prins; Bruce D Hammock; Lindsay Brown
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Saniya S Godil; Anthony L Asher; Scott L Parker; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Low body mass index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: relationship with pre- and postsurgical factors.

Authors:  Roslyn C Tarrant; Sam Lynch; Padraig Sheeran; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Michelle Harrington; David P Moore; Patrick J Kiely
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications.

Authors:  Nimesh Patel; Bradley Bagan; Sumeet Vadera; Mitchell Gil Maltenfort; Harel Deutsch; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Harrop; Ashwini Sharan; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-04

6.  Dialysis is an independent risk factor for perioperative adverse events, readmission, reoperation, and mortality for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Ryan P McLynn; Cheryl K Zogg; Blake N Shultz; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Patawut Bovonratwet; Kirthi S Bellamkonda; Lee E Rubin; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Risk and Cost of 90-Day Complications in Morbidly and Superobese Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Menachem M Meller; Nader Toossi; Norman A Johanson; Mark H Gonzalez; Min-Sun Son; Edmund C Lau
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Effects of Body Mass Index on Clinical Outcomes in Female Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Michela Faggioni; Usman Baber; Arash Ehteshami Afshar; Gennaro Giustino; Samantha Sartori; Sabato Sorrentino; Philippe G Steg; Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker; Martin B Leon; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns; Patrick W Serruys; Marco Valgimigli; Edoardo Camenzind; Giora Weisz; Pieter C Smits; David E Kandzari; Soren Galatius; Clemens Von Birgelen; Raban V Jeger; Ghada W Mikhail; Dipti Itchhaporia; Laxmi Mehta; Rebecca Ortega; Hyo-Soo Kim; Adnan Kastrati; Alaide Chieffo; George D Dangas; Marie-Claude Morice; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Dialysis Dependence Is Associated With Significantly Increased Odds of Perioperative Adverse Events After Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery Even After Controlling for Demographic Factors and Comorbidities.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Alp Yurter; Blake N Shultz; Anoop R Galivanche; Cheryl K Zogg; Patawut Bovonratwet; Lee E Rubin; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-08-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  BMI Specific Complications Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy.

Authors:  Helena Sophie Leitner; Reinhard Pauzenberger; Ines Ana Ederer; Christine Radtke; Stefan Hacker
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Underweight patients are an often under looked "At risk" population after undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Paul S Bagi; Rohil Malpani; Anoop R Galivanche; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-12-10

3.  Perioperative adverse events after different fusion approaches for single-level lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  Raj J Gala; Taylor D Ottesen; Joseph B Kahan; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-05-18

4.  The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective Cervical Spine Surgery Utilization and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Temporal Trends Analysis.

Authors:  Adem Idrizi; Adam M Gordon; Aaron Lam; Charles Conway; Ahmed Saleh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Survival bias may explain the appearance of the obesity paradox in hip fracture patients.

Authors:  R M Amin; M Raad; S S Rao; F Musharbash; M J Best; D F Amanatullah
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.