Literature DB >> 29154381

Interhospital Transfer and Receipt of Specialty Procedures.

Stephanie K Mueller1,2, Jie Zheng3, John Orav4,3, Jeffrey L Schnipper4,2.   

Abstract

The practice of transferring patients between acute care hospitals is variable and largely nonstandardized. Although often-cited reasons for transfer include providing patients access to specialty services only available at the receiving institution, little is known about whether and when patients receive such specialty care during the transfer continuum. We performed a retrospective analysis using 2013 100% Master Beneficiary Summary and Inpatient claims files from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Beneficiaries were included if they were aged =65 years, continuously enrolled in Medicare A and B, with an acute care hospitalization claim, and transferred to another acute care hospital with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleed, renal failure, or hip fracture/dislocation. Associated specialty procedure codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) were identified for each diagnosis. We performed descriptive analyses to compare receipt of specialty procedural services between transferring and receiving hospitals, stratified by diagnosis. Across the 19,613 included beneficiaries, receipt of associated specialty procedures was more common at the receiving than the transferring hospital, with the exception of patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleed. Depending on primary diagnosis, between 32.4% and 89.1% of patients did not receive any associated specialty procedure at the receiving hospital. Our results demonstrate variable receipt of specialty procedural care across the transfer continuum, implying the likelihood of alternate drivers of interhospital transfer other than solely receipt of specialty procedural care.
© 2017 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154381      PMCID: PMC5940580          DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  11 in total

1.  2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Anderson; Cynthia D Adams; Elliott M Antman; Charles R Bridges; Robert M Califf; Donald E Casey; William E Chavey; Francis M Fesmire; Judith S Hochman; Thomas N Levin; A Michael Lincoff; Eric D Peterson; Pierre Theroux; Nanette Kass Wenger; R Scott Wright; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  The incomplete infrastructure for interhospital patient transfer.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Interhospital transfers among Medicare beneficiaries admitted for acute myocardial infarction at nonrevascularization hospitals.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Jeremy M Kahn; Rodney A Hayward; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-03

4.  Rates, Predictors and Variability of Interhospital Transfers: A National Evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie K Mueller; Jie Zheng; E John Orav; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Which patients and where: a qualitative study of patient transfers from community hospitals.

Authors:  Emily A Bosk; Tiffany Veinot; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The effect of the timing of hip fracture surgery on the activity of daily living and mortality in elderly.

Authors:  Hüseyin Doruk; M Refik Mas; Cemil Yildiz; Alper Sonmez; Vecihi Kýrdemir
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  José Augusto Barreto-Filho; Yongfei Wang; Saif S Rathore; Erica S Spatz; Joseph S Ross; Jeptha P Curtis; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Patterns of transfer for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome from community to tertiary care hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew T Roe; Anita Y Chen; Elizabeth R Delong; William E Boden; James E Calvin; Charles B Cairns; Sidney C Smith; Charles V Pollack; Ralph G Brindis; Robert M Califf; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Guidelines for the transfer of critically ill patients. Guidelines Committee of the American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Transfer Guidelines Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  The structure of critical care transfer networks.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Jason D Christie; James Moody; Jeremy M Kahn; David A Asch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of comprehensive u nit-based safety program model in the inter-hospital transfer of patients with critical diseases: a retrospective controlled study.

Authors:  Yimei Gu; Lina Liang; Liuna Ge; Ling Jiang; Xiaole Hu; Jing Xu; Yu Cao; Xiaoting Feng
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.